1-13 of 13 results for subject:Technology
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.252 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Technology
- We searched for
- subject_t:Technology OR subject_t:"Applied science" OR subject_t:"High technology" OR subject_ses:93220
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the new approach towards engagement with overseas-based defence suppliers set out in the White Paper National Security Through Technology, Cmd 8278.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the new approach towards engagement with overseas-based defence suppliers set out in the White Paper National Security Through Technology, Cmd 8278.
The Defence and Security Industrial Engagement Policy (DSIEP) has made good progress since it was launched in the National Security Through Technology White Paper in February 2012. DSIEP tracked over £400 million of inward investment by overseas companies during 2012. This rose to nearly £500 million during 2013. With eight companies now signed up to DSIEP and discussions under way with several others, we hope that this figure will continue to rise. This compares favourably with the previous policy of Industrial Participation. In addition to this quantitative assessment, the Department is in the early stages of a Qualitative assessment of DSIEP and will be engaging with the DSIEP signatories and Defence academics to ensure this is robust.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Ministerial Working Group announced in the White Paper National Security Through Technology, Cmd 8278.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Ministerial Working Group announced in the White Paper National Security Through Technology, Cmd 8278.
Defence and procurement issues have been considered by relevant Government Departments, rather than formerly through the Ministerial Working Group. The Group remains available, if needed, to consider cross-Government aspects of the new approach.
A Defence and Security Export Ministerial Working Group has been established under the chairmanship of the Secretary of State for Defence to co-ordinate Defence Export issues across Government.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the undertaking given in the National Security Through Technology White Paper Cm 8278, paragraph 117, what steps he has taken to pursue arrangements that give his Department's supplier base greater insight into the threats and problems faced by the...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the undertaking given in the National Security Through Technology White Paper Cm 8278, paragraph 117, what steps he has taken to pursue arrangements that give his Department's supplier base greater insight into the threats and problems faced by the...
The Ministry of Defence (MOD) maintains a regular dialogue with our suppliers on the key issues facing the armed forces and the wider MOD through the Defence Suppliers' Forum and its associated working groups, which includes the Research and Development Group. Alongside this, we organise regular industry briefings to ensure suppliers have an effective understanding of the requirements of the armed forces.
The Centre for Defence Enterprise continues to provide in depth briefing to potential suppliers and two major events have been held recently in London, on 27 November 2013 concerning cyber defence and on 3 December 2013 on materials science and armour.
The specific MOD Science and Technology requirements and investment opportunities have been explained at the annual Supplier Networking events led by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), most recently in June 2013 where more than 400 suppliers attended, and published at:
https://www.dstl.gov.uk/suppliernetworkingday1
The MOD uses other supplier events to outline these requirements, most recently at Defence Procurement Research Technology and Exportability in Bristol on 20 November 2013.
Dstl works with the Technology Strategy Board's Knowledge Transfer Networks to communicate challenges and threats to the wider supplier base to stimulate their development of solutions. Dstl signed a Strategic Relationship Charter with Research Councils UK (RCUK) in January 2013 and Dstl staff are embedded in most of the Research Councils to bring greater mutual visibility to the different strands of academia and defence.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the undertaking given in the National Security Through Technology White Paper Cm 8278, paragraph 116, whether he now publishes annually (a) his defence and security priority themes and (b) the supporting strategies for defence and security science and technology.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to the undertaking given in the National Security Through Technology White Paper Cm 8278, paragraph 116, whether he now publishes annually (a) his defence and security priority themes and (b) the supporting strategies for defence and security science and technology.
The National Security Through Technology White Paper (Cm 8278) set out six critical outcomes for defence, security, science and technology. These remain our overall priority.
The Ministry of Defence publishes its Science and Technology requirements on the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) website at:
https://www.dstl.gov.uk/whatwedo
Further details of the science and technology requirements and the investment opportunities are presented at the annual supplier networking events led by DSTL, most recently in June 2013, where more than 400 suppliers attended. The content of the June 2013 event can be found at:
https://www.dstl.gov.uk/suppliernetworkingday1
Counter-terrorism priorities were published in the Contest strategy in 2011. Delivery against these priorities, which includes science and technology, is published annually in the Contest annual report to Parliament at:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/contest
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of his Department's budget will be spent on science and technology in (a) 2013-14, (b) 2014-15 and (c) 2015-16.
[162175]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of his Department's budget will be spent on science and technology in (a) 2013-14, (b) 2014-15 and (c) 2015-16.
[162175]
The Department's plans for funding the centralised Ministry of Defence Science and Technology Programme, under the Department's chief scientific adviser, as a proportion of the Department's budget, equate to 1.2%, 1.3% and 1.3% in financial years 2013-14, 2014-15 and 2015-16 respectively, meeting our intention to sustain science and technology investment at a minimum of 1.2% of the Defence budget.
Following the national curriculum consultation period, which closed on 16 April, we are considering the responses received. We have been engaging with leading figures in industry, such as Dick Olver and Sir James Dyson, schools and academia to ensure that we have world-class design and technology education. We are also committed to providing a curriculum that ensures children receive high-quality cookery teaching and understand the importance of a healthy lifestyle.
I congratulate my hon. Friend on the thoughtful and intelligent way she has engaged with the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Design and Technology Association, and with Dick Olver, Sir James Dyson and others, in considering the new design and technology curriculum. May I encourage her to bring forward a curriculum for the 21st century that inspires young people, particularly girls, to understand the role of science, technology and engineering in solving the real problems of the modern world, environmental, social and economic?
I congratulate my hon. Friend on the thoughtful and intelligent way she has engaged with the Royal Academy of Engineering and the Design and Technology Association, and with Dick Olver, Sir James Dyson and others, in considering the new design and technology curriculum. May I encourage her to bring forward a curriculum for the 21st century that inspires young people, particularly girls, to understand the role of science, technology and engineering in solving the real problems of the modern world, environmental, social and economic?
I thank my hon. Friend for his question and for his excellent contribution to the Westminster Hall debate we had on this subject. I would also like to thank him for his views on the maths, science and computing curriculum. We are now working on ensuring that design and technology is more closely integrated with those curricula and that there is an inspiring technological education that crosses many different industry types and gives schools flexibility to teach design and technology in the best way for the next generation.
We all want young people to be able to cook, but the design and technology curriculum on which my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State is consulting at present is very important to the whole future of British industry and the British economy, so does he not think that giving primacy to cooking in that curriculum might be over-egging the pudding?
We all want young people to be able to cook, but the design and technology curriculum on which my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State is consulting at present is very important to the whole future of British industry and the British economy, so does he not think that giving primacy to cooking in that curriculum might be over-egging the pudding?
In design and technology, we absolutely need to listen to those sections of our economy that will generate prosperity for the future and that want people to be well trained. However, cooking is not just important, but critical as a life skill and as a means of ensuring that Britain remains a wonderful and attractive place for visitors and our own citizens. I pay tribute to Henry Dimbleby and John Vincent for the fantastic work they have done on the school food plan.
Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 138). To be read a second time on 1 March.
Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 138). To be read a second time on 1 March.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy to produce a report on the implementation of the National Security Through Technology White Paper CM 8278, published in February 2012, on the anniversary of that paper’s publication.
[134942]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make it his policy to produce a report on the implementation of the National Security Through Technology White Paper CM 8278, published in February 2012, on the anniversary of that paper’s publication.
[134942]
I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central (Chi Onwurah) on 22 October 2012, Official Report, column 616W. Good progress is being made in implementing the recommendations of the National Security Through Technology White Paper (CM 8278).
We do not intend to produce a formal report one year from publication of the White Paper, although we will use opportunities around the time of the anniversary to highlight key White Paper themes and progress in its implementation.
To ask the Minister for the Olympics on what date in 2012 the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games's technology freeze will come into force; which technologies the freeze will be applied to; and which body is responsible for implementing the freeze.
To ask the Minister for the Olympics on what date in 2012 the London Organising Committee for the Olympic Games's technology freeze will come into force; which technologies the freeze will be applied to; and which body is responsible for implementing the freeze.
What steps he is taking to progress initiatives that will improve public understanding of science following the National Week of Science and Technology. (Failed OPQ)
What steps he is taking to progress initiatives that will improve public understanding of science following the National Week of Science and Technology. (Failed OPQ)