1-2 of 2 results for subject:Monarchy
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.24 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Monarchy
- We searched for
- subject_t:Monarchy OR subject_t:Crown OR subject_ses:92062
Primary member
X
Maclennan of Rogart, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Maclennan of Rogart, Lord (2)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
My Lords, would it not be preferable for the Government to show that they prefer to anticipate problems? However, they have to face them.
My Lords, would it not be preferable for the Government to show that they prefer to anticipate problems? However, they have to face them.
Asked by
Lord Maclennan of Rogart
(Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
2 April 2009
My Lords, we are anticipating this problem; we have anticipated it. Discussions are taking place and will continue to take place, because this is a matter which, at some stage, needs to be resolved.
Subjects
Catholicism; Women; Marriage; Monarchy; Succession; Royal family
Date
2 April 2009
Reference
709 c1179
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
My Lords, is it not a blatant discourtesy to Her Majesty and a disservice to our constitutional monarchy to describe the ministerial power, not least to make war without debate or vote, as the ““royal prerogative””? Should not this piece of tattered absolutism now be universally identified as the ““Prime Ministerial presumption””?
My Lords, is it not a blatant discourtesy to Her Majesty and a disservice to our constitutional monarchy to describe the ministerial power, not least to make war without debate or vote, as the ““royal prerogative””? Should not this piece of tattered absolutism now be universally identified as the ““Prime Ministerial presumption””?
Asked by
Lord Maclennan of Rogart
(Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
30 October 2008
My Lords, we debate important matters of national interest in this House, day in and day out. Again, I pay tribute to the noble Lord, who I know is an expert in this field. However, I do not think that this is an immediate issue for the nation.
Subjects
Monarchy
Date
30 October 2008
Reference
704 c1689
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords