1-2 of 2 results for subject:Injunctions
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.519 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Injunctions
- We searched for
- subject_t:Injunctions OR subject_ses:91670
Primary member
X
McNally, Lord
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
McNally, Lord (2)
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
My Lords, is it not ironic that tomorrow we celebrate the opening of the Supreme Court, which underlines the separation of powers? Is it not time to remind the judiciary that the separation of powers is a two-way street and that judges should not be lured into imposing injunctions that impinge on parliamentary privilege? The letter sent by Carter-Ruck to Mr Speaker is far from penitent. Would this matter not be settled far more quickly if Mr Speaker summoned Carter-Ruck to the Bar of the House?
My Lords, is it not ironic that tomorrow we celebrate the opening of the Supreme Court, which underlines the separation of powers? Is it not time to remind the judiciary that the separation of powers is a two-way street and that judges should not be lured into imposing injunctions that impinge on parliamentary privilege? The letter sent by Carter-Ruck to Mr Speaker is far from penitent. Would this matter not be settled far more quickly if Mr Speaker summoned Carter-Ruck to the Bar of the House?
Asked by
Lord McNally
(Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
15 October 2009
The only answer that I will give to the noble Lord is that I look forward to seeing him at the opening of the Supreme Court tomorrow.
Subjects
Injunctions; Newspaper press; Parliamentary reporting
Date
15 October 2009
Reference
713 c325
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Lords debate on unstarred question on what changes in procedure and liaison between the Home Office and the Press Complaints Commission have taken place following their respective inquiries into the circumstances surrounding press serialisation of 'Cries Unheard' concerning the case of Mary Bell.
Lords debate on unstarred question on what changes in procedure and liaison between the Home Office and the Press Complaints Commission have taken place following their respective inquiries into the circumstances surrounding press serialisation of 'Cries Unheard' concerning the case of Mary Bell.
Lead member
Lord McNally
Answering member
Lord Williams of Mostyn
Department
Home Office
Type
Questions for short debate
Subjects
Disclosure of information; Inquiries; Home Office; Injunctions; Offenders; Proceeds of crime; Publications; Media; Press Complaints Commission; Press freedom; Biography; Bell, Mary
Date
27 January 1999
Reference
596 c1110-26
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords