1-20 of 38 results for subject:Devolution
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.324 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.009 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Devolution
- We searched for
- subject_t:Devolution OR subject_ses:90891
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Does the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster share my profound disappointment that once again the Scottish National party is seeking to frame the Scottish elections as being about a divisive independence referendum, rather than about devolved powers, on which its record is so woeful?
Does the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster share my profound disappointment that once again the Scottish National party is seeking to frame the Scottish elections as being about a divisive independence referendum, rather than about devolved powers, on which its record is so woeful?
I agree. When I visit Scotland to talk to voters ahead of the May elections, they talk to me about the quality of their public services—about how the NHS in Scotland is performing woefully compared with England, and about how the Scottish National party in government in Scotland will block investment into jobs in nuclear energy and the defence industries. That is why a Labour Government in Scotland, under Anas Sarwar, the next Labour First Minister in Scotland, will show the power of two Labour Governments working together to deliver for the people of Scotland, exactly as I have just described happening in Wales.
I begin by paying tribute to the former Scottish Cabinet Secretary Jeane Freeman, who sadly passed away this month. I dealt extensively with Jeane in the implementation of the Scotland Act 2016 and always found her very professional and personable. I also hope that the Secretary of State’s visit to New Zealand was particularly successful, although it did seem an extremely long way to go just to avoid Anas Sarwar.
The Secretary of State may be aware that there is a very successful HIV testing programme in England in HIV testing week. Could he make representations to the Scottish Government so that not only is there an HIV testing week in Scotland, but, radically, it is the same week as in England, so that it could benefit from national focus?
I begin by paying tribute to the former Scottish Cabinet Secretary Jeane Freeman, who sadly passed away this month. I dealt extensively with Jeane in the implementation of the Scotland Act 2016 and always found her very professional and personable. I also hope that the Secretary of State’s visit to New Zealand was particularly successful, although it did seem an extremely long way to go just to avoid Anas Sarwar.
The Secretary of State may be aware that there is a very successful HIV testing programme in England in HIV testing week. Could he make representations to the Scottish Government so that not only is there an HIV testing week in Scotland, but, radically, it is the same week as in England, so that it could benefit from national focus?
I thank the right hon. Gentleman for the characteristic grace and generosity with which he asked his question. I can assure him that it was a long-planned trip to establish relations, which, frankly, should have been established some time ago by the Government in which he served. We are none the less very proud of our defence relationship with New Zealand, and I look forward to being with Anas in Paisley on Friday.
On the substance of the right hon. Gentleman’s question, I commend him for his advocacy over many years. The UK Government recently launched an HIV action plan for England with the aim of ending new HIV transmissions by the end of the decade, and our recent HIV testing week has helped to build public knowledge and understanding so that we can reconnect thousands with the healthcare they need, reduce stigma and, crucially, identify undiagnosed cases. While healthcare is a devolved matter for the Scottish Government, as the right hon. Gentleman knows, we support any initiatives that ensure that people across the United Kingdom get the testing they need.
Are the Government still committed to one civil service across the United Kingdom? If so, what are they proactively doing to ensure that as part of their career development, UK Government civil servants can work within the devolved Administrations and that those within the devolved Administrations can have roles within the UK Government?
Are the Government still committed to one civil service across the United Kingdom? If so, what are they proactively doing to ensure that as part of their career development, UK Government civil servants can work within the devolved Administrations and that those within the devolved Administrations can have roles within the UK Government?
I pay tribute to the work of the civil service, not just for the UK Government but across the United Kingdom. Civil servants do tireless work on behalf of the public each and every day and are a critical part of this Government’s determination to deliver significant change for the country and drive forward the missions we have defined. To the right hon. Member’s question, in the early years of devolution there was a lot more interchange between the home civil service here in London and the civil service in offices such as those in Edinburgh, Belfast and Cardiff. I know that thought is being given to how we ensure that there is the right expertise in the right parts of the country, and there is an information exchange on how to get this right.
It is now nine years since the Scotland Act 2016 transferred a swathe of welfare powers to the Scottish Government. Are Ministers in a position to give a finite date by which the Scottish Government will actually have taken on all those powers and responsibilities? That is still not the case.
It is now nine years since the Scotland Act 2016 transferred a swathe of welfare powers to the Scottish Government. Are Ministers in a position to give a finite date by which the Scottish Government will actually have taken on all those powers and responsibilities? That is still not the case.
As the right hon. Gentleman rightly says, a number of benefits are currently delivered under agency agreements. It is very much for the Scottish Government to broker a conversation with us about either extending those agreements or bringing them to an early conclusion. I am yet to have any such conversations, but should I have any, I will be very happy to let him know.
Does my right hon. Friend share my disappointment that the SNP-Green Scottish Government continue to use the devolution settlement as a platform to pursue constitutional grievances? In reality, would not achieving the best outcome for the people of Scotland and our constituents mean the two Governments working together on a project, for example the A75? If the Governments work together, that will actually be delivered.
Does my right hon. Friend share my disappointment that the SNP-Green Scottish Government continue to use the devolution settlement as a platform to pursue constitutional grievances? In reality, would not achieving the best outcome for the people of Scotland and our constituents mean the two Governments working together on a project, for example the A75? If the Governments work together, that will actually be delivered.
I absolutely agree with my right hon. Friend. The A75, along with the A77, came up as a vital route in the Union connectivity review by Lord Hendy of Richmond Hill—Sir Peter Hendy as he was at the time. We are finally working with the Scottish Government, and the UK Government are funding a feasibility study for the upgrade of the A75. I am delighted that progress is being made.
What a pleasure it is to see you in the Chair for Scottish questions, Madam Deputy Speaker.
I add my congratulations to Humza Yousaf on becoming First Minister of Scotland, and I recognise the inclusive and historic nature of his appointment. Does my right hon. Friend agree that, based on the experience of our constituents, Mr Yousaf will have to up his game considerably in his new role? As Transport Minister, he came to Dumfries in 2016 to hold a transport summit, and seven years later, precisely zero of the commitments given that day have been delivered.
What a pleasure it is to see you in the Chair for Scottish questions, Madam Deputy Speaker.
I add my congratulations to Humza Yousaf on becoming First Minister of Scotland, and I recognise the inclusive and historic nature of his appointment. Does my right hon. Friend agree that, based on the experience of our constituents, Mr Yousaf will have to up his game considerably in his new role? As Transport Minister, he came to Dumfries in 2016 to hold a transport summit, and seven years later, precisely zero of the commitments given that day have been delivered.
Not only did Humza Yousaf fail in the transport brief but, as we know from his opponent, who took almost half the vote—48%—he also failed in his other briefs of justice and health.
Is the Minister aware that the Scottish Government are planning to bring forward draconian restrictions on the advertising of whisky and other drinks in Scotland? Not only will that cost jobs in Scotland but it will make it much more difficult for the industry to export to the EU and elsewhere.
Is the Minister aware that the Scottish Government are planning to bring forward draconian restrictions on the advertising of whisky and other drinks in Scotland? Not only will that cost jobs in Scotland but it will make it much more difficult for the industry to export to the EU and elsewhere.
My right hon. Friend makes an important point. Such measures could have a considerable negative impact on so many Scottish businesses. That is precisely why we are seeking opportunities to support them, for example with trade deals, and trying to ensure that we reduce tariffs and are able to export more overseas. While we are backing our businesses right across the UK, I hope that in future we can get support from the Opposition, who might at some point come and join us and support one of the trade deals we are negotiating.
Statement on the operation of the Sewel convention and its application to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill in relation to Scotland.
Statement on the operation of the Sewel convention and its application to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill in relation to Scotland.
Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution. Ways and means resolution. Programme motion (no. 3) on proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments considered. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords amendment 22 engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords amendment 1, discussed with Lords amendments 2 to 62, debated and agreed to on question. Lords amendments 2 to 62 agreed to, with Commons financial privileges waived in respect of Lords amendment 22.
Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution. Ways and means resolution. Programme motion (no. 3) on proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to on question. Lords amendments considered. The Deputy Speaker announced that Lords amendment 22 engaged Commons financial privilege. Lords amendment 1, discussed with Lords amendments 2...
Statement on the new fiscal framework for Scotland, which was agreed yesterday by the United Kingdom and Scottish Governments.
Statement on the new fiscal framework for Scotland, which was agreed yesterday by the United Kingdom and Scottish Governments.
Programme (No. 2) motion agreed to on question.
Programme (No. 2) motion agreed to on question.
Report stage. Government new clause 12 (Permanence of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government), discussed with Government new clause 13 (Functions exercisable within devolved competence: elections); new clause 1 (Independent Commission on Full Fiscal Autonomy); new clause 4 (Review of operation of gift aid in Scotland); new clause 6 (Local discretionary taxation); new clause 7 (Local authority's power of general competence); new clause 8 (Competences of local government in Scotland); new clause 35 (Consent of the Scottish Parliament to certain Westminster Acts); new clause 36 (Scottish independence referendum). Government new clauses 12 and 13 agreed to. New clause 1 negatived on division (191 votes to 341). New clause 35 negatived on division (245 votes to 287). New clause 36 negatived on division (56 votes to 289 - corrected from 56 to 269 by Speaker's statement on 10 November). Clause 1 amended and replaced by Government new clause 12. Government new clause 14 (Welfare foods), discussed with Government new clause 15 (Abortion); Government new clause 16 (Public sector duty regarding socio-economic inequalities); Government new clause 17 (Destination of fines, forfeitures and fixed penalties); new clause 2 (New benefits); new clause 3 (Joint Committee on Welfare Devolution); new clause 5 (Childcare element of universal credit); new clause 10 (Commission on social and economic rights); new clause 18 (Tax credits); new clause 19 (Employment and industrial relations); new clause 20 (National minimum wage); new clause 21 (National insurance: employers' contributions); new clause 22 (Job search and support); new clause 23 (Working age benefits); new clause 24 (Universal credit: powers to vary other elements); new clause 25 (Benefits relating to children); new clause 26 (Health and safety); new clause 27 (Equal opportunities); new clause 28 (Crown property); new clause 29 (Party political broadcasts); new clause 30 (Broadcasting); new clause 31 (Levies in respect of agriculture, taking wild game, aquaculture and fisheries etc); new clause 32 (Rail services); new clause 33 (Civil Aviation Authority); new schedule 1 (Joint Committee on Welfare Devolution). Government new clauses 14, 16, 17, and 34 agreed to. Government new clause 15 agreed to on division (350 votes to 183). New clause 18 negatived on division (56 votes to 477). New clause 27 negatived on division (61 votes to 288). Amendment to clause 32 (Equal opportunities) negatived on division (242 votes to 287). Other amendments to clauses agreed to. Third reading. Queen's Consent signified. Agreed to on question and Bill passed.
Report stage. Government new clause 12 (Permanence of the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government), discussed with Government new clause 13 (Functions exercisable within devolved competence: elections); new clause 1 (Independent Commission on Full Fiscal Autonomy); new clause 4 (Review of operation of gift aid in Scotland); new clause 6 (Local...
Second reading agreed to on question. Amendment not selected. Programme motion agreed to on question. Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed to on question. Ways and Means resolution agreed to on question.
Second reading agreed to on question. Amendment not selected. Programme motion agreed to on question. Queen's recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed to on question. Ways and Means resolution agreed to on question.
Statement on the further devolution process in Scotland and the publication of draft clauses to implement the Smith commission agreement.
Statement on the further devolution process in Scotland and the publication of draft clauses to implement the Smith commission agreement.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.
Scotland Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments agreed to.
Scotland Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendments agreed to.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many meetings (a) he, (b) his predecessors and (c) other Ministers in his Department had with Scottish Executive Ministers in each month since May 2007.
To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland how many meetings (a) he, (b) his predecessors and (c) other Ministers in his Department had with Scottish Executive Ministers in each month since May 2007.