Skip to main content

1-20 of 25 results for subject:Devolution

Primary member X
Murray, Ian

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Murray, Ian (25)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Let me take this opportunity to congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Michael Shanks) not only on his vast—and fast—promotion to the shadow Front Bench but on the 20.4% swing from the SNP that brought him the by-election victory.

The announcement of the closure of the refinery at Grangemouth is a hammer blow. Too many communities are still living with the devastation of being left behind after coalmine closures in the 1980s. That must not be allowed to happen again. Grangemouth’s owner is buying football clubs and investing in plants elsewhere, while the workers lose out. The Prime Minister has decided that a culture war on the environment trumps getting the UK into the global green energy race by backing

Labour’s green energy superpower plans. The devolution settlement demands that both Governments work together, but they certainly do not. What discussions is the Secretary of State having with the Scottish Government to protect jobs at Grangemouth? What impact will the closure have on the Acorn carbon capture and storage project?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 cc818-9
House
House of Commons

It is the 25th anniversary of the Scottish Parliament next year—one of the Labour party’s proudest achievements. However, recently it has been riven by failure and scandal, from one in seven on NHS waiting lists to ferries, iPads and camper vans. Much has been made about the dual role of the Government-appointed Lord Advocate, who sits in the Scottish Cabinet while presiding over prosecutions in Scotland. What discussions has the Secretary of State had with the Scottish Government about Anas Sarwar’s idea to split the dual role of Scotland’s top law officer, to maintain the separation of powers between the Government and the judiciary?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 November 2023
Reference
741 c819
House
House of Commons

It is great to see you back in the Chair, Madam Deputy Speaker. Welcome back, particularly to Scottish questions.

There has been a seismic victory—an historic victory—this week: the Scotland football team beat Spain at Hampden last night, so we all send our congratulations to them. May I echo the Secretary of State’s congratulations to Humza Yousaf, the new First Minister of Scotland? The Secretary of State rightly challenged Mr Yousaf to engage reverse gear on independence, but I think he may already have crashed that car. The new First Minister of course inherits a divided party and the SNP’s dreadful record on public services, but he does not inherit Nicola Sturgeon’s mandate—at the Holyrood election, the ballot paper said

“Nicola Sturgeon for First Minister”,

not “Humza Yousaf”. Does the Secretary of State agree with me and with Humza Yousaf himself, who rightly called for a UK general election after there was twice a change in Prime Minister last year? Does the Secretary of State agree that a new First Minister with no mandate means that there should now be not only a general election, but a Scottish election?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2023
Reference
730 c1000
House
House of Commons

That answer shows that both the Conservative party and the SNP are democracy deniers. In January—[ Interruption. ] In January, Madam Deputy Speaker—[ Interruption. ] They don’t like it up ’em! In January, the UK Government announced that they had signed a memorandum of understanding with BioNTech and Moderna to conduct trials of vaccines that can attack cancer cells. Such innovative treatments could be a lifeline for those with terminal cancers, such as David Williamson from Glasgow, who contacted me and others to plead to be accepted on to those trials. However, David lives in Scotland, and as it stands the trials are due to take place in England only. He has written to both the UK and Scottish Health Secretaries but has failed to receive a response. David does not want to die knowing that there could be a treatment that could help him. Does the Secretary of State agree that potentially life-saving treatments should be available throughout the UK? Will he work to resolve this matter urgently for David and thousands of others ?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2023
Reference
730 c1000
House
House of Commons

I join the Secretary of State in recognising that it is the 11th day of the 11th month, lest we forget those who gave their lives so that we could live freely today. We will always remember them.

I am disappointed that the Secretary of State did not congratulate President-elect Joe Biden on his wonderful election in America. Given that in a recent

poll 75% of Scots said that they would vote for Joe Biden, they have eventually got the Government they would have voted for.

The announcement this week of a potential covid vaccine is incredibly positive. While it certainly does not mean, of course, that we have reached the end of this crisis, it does perhaps signal some hope for the public. If the vaccine is approved, the country will face an unprecedented logistical challenge. If mass vaccination is to be done successfully, we will need all levels of government working together. However, a poll just yesterday found that two thirds of Scots were dissatisfied that the Scottish and UK Governments do not work together and a majority wanted closer co-operation. So can the Minister inform the House: what work are the UK and Scottish Governments undertaking together to build an infrastructure that will be able to distribute and administer any future vaccines to everyone?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2020
Reference
683 cc891-2
House
House of Commons

I appreciate what the Minister said, but I think the public would look on it very unfavourably if both Governments did not work together to ensure that this vaccine is distributed.

But we also must not lose sight of today’s challenges. While the Chancellor’s latest plan to extend furlough until March is very welcome, there remain millions of people across the UK and in Scotland who have not received any support as lockdowns continue. The 3 million taxpayers excluded from Government support include countless self-employed, pay-as-you-earn freelancers, and many, many others. It is understandable that there may have been some cracks in hastily designed schemes announced in March, but not to fix those and to continue to exclude millions from any support is inexcusable. I raised this with the Secretary of State in this House on 1 July and 7 October, so, for the third time: will the Scotland Office demand that the Chancellor reconsiders and provides support to those taxpayers left without any help from this Government?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 2020
Reference
683 c892
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to his news story, Chancellor sets out extra £750 million coronavirus funding for frontline charities, published on 8 April 2020, how many additional consequentials will be passed to each of the devolved administrations using the Barnett formula as a result of...

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 May 2020
Reference
40583
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State set out for the House the mechanism he will use to amend clause 11 of the EU withdrawal Bill, should no agreement be in place by the time the Bill completes its passage in the other place?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 March 2018
Reference
637 c288
House
House of Commons

Will the Secretary of State tell the House what he thinks is wrong with the devolution powers in the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill, and how he would like to see them fixed? Or is it that, in this week of Burns celebrations, he is just the great puddin’ o’ the chieftain race?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 2018
Reference
635 c246
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, whether paragraph 55 of the Smith Commission Agreement applies to payments made under part 3 of the Scotland Act 2016 related to the calculations of the benefit cap.

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 2017
Reference
66365
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will hold a consultation on deciding the commissioning of asylum accommodation to regional strategic partnerships; and what steps she is taking to ensure that devolved governments have a role in deciding on arrangements for decentralising commissioning and ensuring...

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 February 2017
Reference
62661
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what recent discussions she has had with Ministers of the Scottish Government on the progress of devolving administrative responsibilities for (a) employment tribunals and (b) other relevant tribunals to the Scottish Government.

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 January 2017
Reference
58712
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, how many calls the hotline established to give the devolved administrations access to his Department has received; and what the (a) longest, (b) shortest and (c) average response time was to those calls.

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 November 2016
Reference
52140
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, whether powers not specifically reserved under Schedule 5 of the Scotland Act 1998 will automatically revert to the competence of the Scottish Parliament after the UK leaves the EU; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2016
Reference
49524
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered devolved governments and negotiations on the UK leaving the EU. Agreed to on question. Sitting adjourned without Question put.

Lead member
Ian Murray
Answering member
Robin Walker; Catherine West
Department
Department for Exiting the European Union
Type
Debates
Date
21 July 2016
Reference
613 cc427-454WH
House
House of Commons

That this House acknowledges the democratic will of the people of Scotland to remain in the EU and the UK; notes that there are 173,000 EU citizens living in Scotland who have developed strong friendships and affirms that they remain welcome and that their contribution to Scotland's economy, society and...

Primary sponsor
Ian Murray (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
13 July 2016
Reference
325
House
House of Commons

Eighteenth opposition day debate (part two). Closure motion. Agreed to on question. Amendment negatived on division (54 to 297). Main question negatived on division (201 to 295).

Lead member
Ian Murray
Answering member
David Mundell
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Opposition days
Date
3 February 2016
Reference
605
House
House of Commons

I take the opportunity this Armistice weekend to pay tribute to our armed forces for their sacrifices to this country.

Scottish and UK Ministers have said repeatedly that the fiscal framework negotiations will be concluded this autumn. Can the Secretary of State explain to the House and the country why they have been delayed until January at the earliest?

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2015
Reference
601 c951
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for that answer, but Scotland’s First Minister has warned that the SNP Government may reject the Scotland Bill

“if the accompanying fiscal framework”

is not

“fair to Scotland”.

It is clear that they are looking for any excuse for the fiscal framework to delay further powers for Scotland. Will the Secretary of State assure us that the fiscal framework will be agreed before the Scottish Parliament is dissolved in March, and can he explain why both he and the SNP are conspiring to make this agreement the tartan TTIP—the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership—delivered behind closed doors with no public transparency? That raises the question of what they are trying to hide.

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2015
Reference
601 c951
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, how much Barnett consequential funding the Government has provided to each of the devolved administrations as a result of changes in funding provided to the Department for Transport in each year since 2010-11 to date; and with which programmes such changes in funding...

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 September 2015
Reference
10192
House
House of Commons