Skip to main content

1-20 of 55 results for subject:Devolution

Primary member X
Robertson, Angus

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More
Robertson, Angus (55)

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

We associate ourselves with the condolences given by the Prime Minister and the leader of the Labour party and their praise for the emergency and security services during and in the wake of the appalling terrorist atrocity last week.

Last year, the Prime Minister promised that before she triggered article 50 on leaving the European Union she would secure a UK-wide approach—an agreement—with the Governments of—[Interruption.] Last year, the Prime Minister did make that promise: she promised that there would be an agreement with the Governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland before she triggered article 50. The Prime Minister has now triggered article 50, and she has done so without an agreement; there is no agreement. Why has she broken her promise and broken her word?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
624 c242
House
House of Commons

People viewing will note that the Prime Minister did not deny that she said she would seek a UK-wide approach and agreement with the Governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and there is no agreement.

The Scottish Government were elected with a higher percentage of the vote—a bigger electoral mandate—than the UK Government. Yesterday the Scottish Parliament voted by 69 to 59 that people in Scotland should have a choice about their future. After the negotiations on the European Union are concluded, there will be a period for democratic approval of the outcome. That choice

will be exercised in this Parliament, in the European Parliament and in 27 member states of the European Union. Given that everybody else will have a choice at that time, will the people of Scotland have a choice about their future?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
624 cc242-4
House
House of Commons

May I begin by extending condolences, as the Prime Minister and the leader of the Labour party have done, to the family, friends and colleagues of the former Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland, Martin McGuinness? We pay tribute to his contribution towards peace, while never forgetting the terrible human price during the troubles.

Last year, the Prime Minister promised that she would secure a UK-wide agreement between the Governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and her Government, before triggering article 50 on Brexit. Since then she has delayed, she has blocked, she has been intransigent and she has lectured—surprise, surprise; she has no agreement. There is no agreement. Will those be her negotiating tactics with the European Union?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 March 2017
Reference
623 c857
House
House of Commons

We on the SNP Benches join the Prime Minister and the leader of the Labour Party in extending our condolences to the family and friends of Sir Gerald Kaufman. We also extend our best wishes to the people of Wales on St David’s Day.

In Scottish questions just prior to PMQs today, Ministers were unable to answer basic questions about the Government’s plans for agriculture and for fisheries. Those are important industries for the rural economy and are devolved to the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament. With Brexit ending the role of Brussels in those areas, will all decisions about agriculture and fisheries be made at Holyrood—yes or no?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2017
Reference
622 c290
House
House of Commons

That is a very interesting answer because people in Scotland, including those working in the agriculture and fisheries sectors, were told during the Brexit referendum that farming and fisheries powers

would be exercised fully by the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament. Judging by the Prime Minister’s answer, however, it seems that that will not be true. Will the Prime Minister confirm today—she has the opportunity—that it is her intention to ensure that UK Ministers will negotiate and regulate over large areas that impact on Scottish fisheries and agriculture post-Brexit?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
1 March 2017
Reference
622 c290
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister has indicated that she wants to take the views of the elected representatives and the devolved institutions on Brexit seriously. So it stands to reason then that if there is no Northern Ireland Assembly and no Northern Ireland Executive for much of the time before the March timetable that she has set for invoking article 50, she will be unable to consult properly, to discuss fully and to find agreement on the complex issues during this period. In these circumstances, will the Prime Minister postpone invoking article 50—[Interruption]—or will she just plough on regardless?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 January 2017
Reference
619 c309
House
House of Commons

I suppose we should view it as progress that the Secretary of State believes they are fine words, and perhaps he will follow the Scottish Government’s initiative, but it is fair to say that the majority of welfare and economic powers are not being devolved to the Scottish Parliament. Will the Secretary of State confirm that he has no plans to devolve powers to deal with Scottish legal partnerships, and the risks they pose in the fight against global money-laundering and organised crime? I have raised this matter with the Prime Minister and spoken to the right hon. Gentleman. Will he now tell the House what he and the UK Government will actually do about it?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 November 2016
Reference
617 c881
House
House of Commons

The Scottish Government have announced that the new powers over benefits will be used to end the misery being meted out to disabled Scots by the UK Government. First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has pledged to reduce the need for assessments for personal independence payments and disability living allowance, in particular for those with

long-term illness. Will the Secretary of State take the opportunity to welcome that and urge his UK Cabinet colleagues to follow suit?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 November 2016
Reference
617 c880
House
House of Commons

We on the SNP Benches join in the condolences expressed by the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition in relation to Harry Harpham, and we pass on our best wishes to his family at this sad and difficult time.

The Prime Minister made a vow, and his party signed an agreement, that there would be no detriment to Scotland with new devolution arrangements. Why is the UK Treasury proposing plans that may be detrimental to Scotland to the tune of £3 billion?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2016
Reference
605 c1571
House
House of Commons

In the context of the referendums, whether in Scotland or across the UK on EU membership, do not voters have a right to know that what is promised by the UK Government can be trusted and will be delivered in full? Will the Prime Minister tell the Treasury that time is running out on delivering a fair fiscal framework, and that it must agree a deal that is both fair to the people of Scotland and fair to the rest of the United Kingdom?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2016
Reference
605 c1571
House
House of Commons

It is interesting that the Secretary of State did not take the opportunity to condemn the views of his Conservative colleagues who believe that Scotland is subsidised.

Only 9% of people in Scotland believe that the vow has been delivered, so unsurprisingly the Government are belatedly having to accept amendments. The financial framework underpinning the Bill is crucial. The Secretary of State could only give a one-word answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Lanark and Hamilton East (Angela Crawley), so will he elaborate and tell us exactly when the UK Government will update this Parliament on the progress made on the fiscal framework?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2015
Reference
601 c950
House
House of Commons

The Secretary of State has now had a second opportunity to condemn the views of his Back Benchers that Scotland is subsidised. I challenge him to come to the Dispatch Box and disassociate himself from the views of his colleagues. His Government are bringing in detrimental measures that will impact on families and individuals—not just in Scotland, but across the length and breadth of the UK. Will he give us some detail on what is going on between the Treasury and the Scottish Government, and give an assurance that there will be no detrimental implications for people in Scotland as part of the fiscal framework?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 2015
Reference
601 c951
House
House of Commons

May I begin by congratulating the new leader of the Labour party? We in the Scottish National party look forward to working with him to oppose Tory austerity, and we hope that Labour MPs will join him and us in opposing Trident when the time comes. [Hon. Members: “Oh!”] One year ago to the day, the Prime Minister made a vow to the people of Scotland. Promises were made to deliver home rule and an arrangement as near to federalism as possible. However, the former Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, now says that the UK Government are

“falling short on the delivery of the recommendations of the Smith Commission on Scottish devolution”.

When will the Prime Minister deliver on the promises that he made to the people of Scotland?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2015
Reference
599 c1041
House
House of Commons

That is very interesting. Whatever happened to the new style of PMQs? One of the architects of the vow says that it is not being fully delivered, as does the Scottish Trades Union Congress. The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations, Carers Scotland

and Enable Scotland all say that not enough welfare powers are being devolved. Only 9% of people in Scotland believe that the vow has been delivered, and not one amendment to the Scotland Bill has been accepted by the Government. Tory bluster and condescension will not go down well in Scotland. So, for the second time, may I ask the Prime Minister to tell us, in his new style of answering at Prime Minister’s questions, when he will deliver on the promises that were made to the people of Scotland?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
16 September 2015
Reference
599 c1041
House
House of Commons

The Labour party was in power for 13 years and failed to deliver a single additional power to Scotland that was outlined in the vow. The Conservatives and the Lib Dems have been in power for five years and, like Labour, they are not proposing the real home rule that was promised. Do the Prime Minister and the leader of the Labour party now understand why the voters of Scotland are sick of the Westminster parties, in contrast with the SNP, which will always put Scotland first?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 February 2015
Reference
592 c268
House
House of Commons

The Scottish Government and the Scottish National party have been pressing for the devolution of all powers over fracking for some time. Why have the UK Government ruled out devolving power over fracking licences until after the general election?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c849
House
House of Commons

Until now, the UK Government’s position has been to remove the right of Scottish householders to object to unconventional gas or oil drilling underneath their homes. What will the position be between now and the full devolution of powers over fracking? Will the Department of Energy and Climate Change give an undertaking that it will not issue any fresh licences?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2015
Reference
590 c850
House
House of Commons

Does the Prime Minister intend to devolve corporation tax to Northern Ireland and Scotland in tandem, or, in contrast with the vow, has he decided to veto the devolution of corporation tax to Scotland entirely?

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 December 2014
Reference
589 c296
House
House of Commons

That this House notes the Conservative Party's policy to bring forward an in/out referendum in the next parliament, and growing support for such a vote in other UK political parties; further notes that academic research by Durham University and the University of East Anglia suggest that an in/out referendum on...

Primary sponsor
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
29 October 2014
Reference
443
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland (1) what (a) external organisations and (b) individuals his Department has engaged with as part of the Scotland Analysis programme; and what was discussed in that engagement;

[153049]

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Scotland
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
153049; 561 cc1136-7W
House
House of Commons