1-16 of 16 results for subject:Databases
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.215 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Databases
- We searched for
- subject_t:Databases OR subject_t:"Data banks" OR subject_ses:90822
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what meetings he (a) has had and (b) plans to have with the National Police Chiefs’ Council through the Home Office National Law Enforcement Data Programme on the introduction of the National Register of Missing Persons.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what meetings he (a) has had and (b) plans to have with the National Police Chiefs’ Council through the Home Office National Law Enforcement Data Programme on the introduction of the National Register of Missing Persons.
Officials have been and will continue to be in regular contact with the National Police Chiefs’ Council on the introduction of the National Register of Missing Persons.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he plans to introduce a national missing persons database.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he plans to introduce a national missing persons database.
We are working with the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) through the Home Office National Law Enforcement Data Programme (NLEDP) to deliver a National Register of Missing Persons (NRMP) which will enable us to have a snapshot of live missing incidents across police forces in England and Wales. This will assist officers when they encounter a missing person particularly if that missing person is outside their home force area.
We are currently working towards the NRMP to be in use operationally in 2020/2021.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent steps her Department has taken to improve the quality and comparability of data on assaults on the police.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent steps her Department has taken to improve the quality and comparability of data on assaults on the police.
We have worked closely with police forces in recent years to improve the quality of data on assaults on the police. In July 2015 provisional data were published for the first time since 2009/10, presenting data on assaults without injury from crime recording systems alongside information from health and safety systems to provide a more complete picture of assaults.
These data were then developed further in 2016, with forces asked to submit more complete data on assaults from their crime recording systems, including cases that involved injury as well as cases that did not. This allowed a more refined figure of 23,000 assaults on police officers in 2015/16 to be estimated.
We are continuing to work with forces to better capture assaults that involve injury to the police in recorded crime data.
Recorded crime data on “assaults without injury on a constable” are published at Community Safety Partnership (equivalent to boroughs in London) and Police Force Area level, and are available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-recorded-crime-open-data-tables
There are no current plans to collect this data at parliamentary constituency level.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the effect on patient confidentiality of the decision by NHS Royal Free Foundation Trust to grant DeepMind access to NHS patient records; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what assessment he has made of the effect on patient confidentiality of the decision by NHS Royal Free Foundation Trust to grant DeepMind access to NHS patient records; and if he will make a statement.
Individual organisations providing National Health Service care are the data controllers for the information that they hold, and are responsible for ensuring that there is a legal basis for sharing confidential patient information with a third party.
Individual organisations must ensure that where patient consent is the basis for information sharing that patients are fully informed about the purposes for which personal information might be processed and with whom they might share information. Where a NHS organisation has contracted a third party to process personal information on its behalf to support the provision of direct care to patients the individual organisation must ensure that it has contractual safeguards in place to prevent the third party from using the data for purposes other than those determined by the NHS organisation.
NHS organisations should not share confidential patient information where the patient has objected – except in cases where there is a legal requirement to share data or an overriding public interest.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what recent representations he has received from (a) Healthwatch England, (b) Healthwatch Enfield and (c) other patient groups on the decision by NHS Royal Free Foundation Trust to grant Google DeepMind access to NHS patient records.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what recent representations he has received from (a) Healthwatch England, (b) Healthwatch Enfield and (c) other patient groups on the decision by NHS Royal Free Foundation Trust to grant Google DeepMind access to NHS patient records.
The Department has received no representations from patient groups on this subject.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment the Financial Conduct Authority has made of the effectiveness of its regulatory instruments, including enforcement action, in ensuring compliance by banks and other financial institutions regarding record keeping.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment the Financial Conduct Authority has made of the effectiveness of its regulatory instruments, including enforcement action, in ensuring compliance by banks and other financial institutions regarding record keeping.
This is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is operationally independent from Government.
The question has been passed on to the FCA. The FCA will reply directly to the Rt Hon Joan Ryan MP by letter. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment the Financial Conduct Authority has made of the implications for its policies of the statement made by the financial service messaging platform Symphony that they offer Guaranteed Data Deletion; and whether this statement complies with financial regulations on record keeping.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment the Financial Conduct Authority has made of the implications for its policies of the statement made by the financial service messaging platform Symphony that they offer Guaranteed Data Deletion; and whether this statement complies with financial regulations on record keeping.
This is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is operationally independent from Government.
The question has been passed on to the FCA. The FCA will reply directly to the Rt Hon Joan Ryan MP by letter. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration the Financial Conduct Authority has given to ensuring that encryption keys to encrypted record keeping data between banks and financial service messaging platforms are held by a third party.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration the Financial Conduct Authority has given to ensuring that encryption keys to encrypted record keeping data between banks and financial service messaging platforms are held by a third party.
This is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is operationally independent from Government.
The question has been passed on to the FCA. The FCA will reply directly to the Rt Hon Joan Ryan MP by letter. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration the Financial Conduct Authority has given to requests from banks to sign a memorandum of understanding to ensure that financial record keeping regulations in the UK are not being breached.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration the Financial Conduct Authority has given to requests from banks to sign a memorandum of understanding to ensure that financial record keeping regulations in the UK are not being breached.
This is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is operationally independent from Government.
The question has been passed on to the FCA. The FCA will reply directly to the Rt Hon Joan Ryan MP by letter. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment the Financial Conduct Authority has made of the effectiveness of its regulations to ensure record keeping by banks and other financial institutions are not being (a) deleted, (b) manipulated or (c) altered.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment the Financial Conduct Authority has made of the effectiveness of its regulations to ensure record keeping by banks and other financial institutions are not being (a) deleted, (b) manipulated or (c) altered.
This is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is operationally independent from Government.
The question has been passed on to the FCA. The FCA will reply directly to the Rt Hon Joan Ryan MP by letter. A copy of the letter will be placed in the Library of the House.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether record keeping regulations relating to financial services apply to organisations offering third party data storage to banks.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether record keeping regulations relating to financial services apply to organisations offering third party data storage to banks.
Authorised firms, such as banks, must be able to meet their regulatory requirements even when relying on a third party for the performance of operational functions. The firm must make available to the regulator all information necessary to ensure the regulator is able to supervise the compliance of the outsourced activities with the regulatory requirements, including those on record keeping.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Financial Conduct Authority takes to ensure that banks comply with record-keeping regulations.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Financial Conduct Authority takes to ensure that banks comply with record-keeping regulations.
The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) repeals the existing Market Abuse Directive with effect from 3 July 2016 and will have direct application in the UK. It is therefore necessary to make relevant changes to the UK’s existing domestic regime, which is set out primarily in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, to ensure that national law complies with MAR. The necessary changes are currently being considered by HM Treasury and the FCA.
In relation to record-keeping requirements, FCA rules require investment firms and credit institutionsto maintain orderlyrecords of theirbusiness, including all services and transactions undertaken by them. These mustbe sufficient to enable the FCAto monitor the firm's compliance with its regulatory requirements and retained for a period of at least five years. Therules alsoincludespecific requirements for firmstorecordtelephoneconversationsand electronic communications regarding client orders and dealing on own account. These must be retained for a period of at least six months.
The FCA supervises firms against therules, including on record keeping, as part of theirongoing supervisory work. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 permitsthe FCA to impose appropriate fines, which are not limited, for the contravention on a requirement imposed on them under the Act. The FCA are required to publisha policy statement setting outhow they determinethe appropriate level of financial penalty. This can be foundhere:https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/DEPP/6/1.html?date=2015-10-27.
The EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) introduced a harmonised framework for investor protection in the EU. The Government has supported a revised directive,MiFID II, which will replace itfrom 2017. MiFID IIintroducesmore detailed EU requirements on record keeping and an EU wide taping regime, aimed at strengthening investor protection and enhancing market integrity. This will also extend the period telephone conversations and electronic communications must be retained for to at least five years.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the EU's Market in Financial Services Directive in (a) improving record-keeping by banks and (b) tackling potential abuse and manipulation of the financial markets.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the EU's Market in Financial Services Directive in (a) improving record-keeping by banks and (b) tackling potential abuse and manipulation of the financial markets.
The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) repeals the existing Market Abuse Directive with effect from 3 July 2016 and will have direct application in the UK. It is therefore necessary to make relevant changes to the UK’s existing domestic regime, which is set out primarily in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, to ensure that national law complies with MAR. The necessary changes are currently being considered by HM Treasury and the FCA.
In relation to record-keeping requirements, FCA rules require investment firms and credit institutionsto maintain orderlyrecords of theirbusiness, including all services and transactions undertaken by them. These mustbe sufficient to enable the FCAto monitor the firm's compliance with its regulatory requirements and retained for a period of at least five years. Therules alsoincludespecific requirements for firmstorecordtelephoneconversationsand electronic communications regarding client orders and dealing on own account. These must be retained for a period of at least six months.
The FCA supervises firms against therules, including on record keeping, as part of theirongoing supervisory work. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 permitsthe FCA to impose appropriate fines, which are not limited, for the contravention on a requirement imposed on them under the Act. The FCA are required to publisha policy statement setting outhow they determinethe appropriate level of financial penalty. This can be foundhere:https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/DEPP/6/1.html?date=2015-10-27.
The EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) introduced a harmonised framework for investor protection in the EU. The Government has supported a revised directive,MiFID II, which will replace itfrom 2017. MiFID IIintroducesmore detailed EU requirements on record keeping and an EU wide taping regime, aimed at strengthening investor protection and enhancing market integrity. This will also extend the period telephone conversations and electronic communications must be retained for to at least five years.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Financial Conduct Authority is taking to ensure that (a) traders and (b) banks keep a record of their communications on financial services.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps the Financial Conduct Authority is taking to ensure that (a) traders and (b) banks keep a record of their communications on financial services.
The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) repeals the existing Market Abuse Directive with effect from 3 July 2016 and will have direct application in the UK. It is therefore necessary to make relevant changes to the UK’s existing domestic regime, which is set out primarily in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, to ensure that national law complies with MAR. The necessary changes are currently being considered by HM Treasury and the FCA.
In relation to record-keeping requirements, FCA rules require investment firms and credit institutionsto maintain orderlyrecords of theirbusiness, including all services and transactions undertaken by them. These mustbe sufficient to enable the FCAto monitor the firm's compliance with its regulatory requirements and retained for a period of at least five years. Therules alsoincludespecific requirements for firmstorecordtelephoneconversationsand electronic communications regarding client orders and dealing on own account. These must be retained for a period of at least six months.
The FCA supervises firms against therules, including on record keeping, as part of theirongoing supervisory work. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 permitsthe FCA to impose appropriate fines, which are not limited, for the contravention on a requirement imposed on them under the Act. The FCA are required to publisha policy statement setting outhow they determinethe appropriate level of financial penalty. This can be foundhere:https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/DEPP/6/1.html?date=2015-10-27.
The EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) introduced a harmonised framework for investor protection in the EU. The Government has supported a revised directive,MiFID II, which will replace itfrom 2017. MiFID IIintroducesmore detailed EU requirements on record keeping and an EU wide taping regime, aimed at strengthening investor protection and enhancing market integrity. This will also extend the period telephone conversations and electronic communications must be retained for to at least five years.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what range of fines can be levied for breaches of record-keeping regulations relating to financial services.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what range of fines can be levied for breaches of record-keeping regulations relating to financial services.
The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) repeals the existing Market Abuse Directive with effect from 3 July 2016 and will have direct application in the UK. It is therefore necessary to make relevant changes to the UK’s existing domestic regime, which is set out primarily in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, to ensure that national law complies with MAR. The necessary changes are currently being considered by HM Treasury and the FCA.
In relation to record-keeping requirements, FCA rules require investment firms and credit institutionsto maintain orderlyrecords of theirbusiness, including all services and transactions undertaken by them. These mustbe sufficient to enable the FCAto monitor the firm's compliance with its regulatory requirements and retained for a period of at least five years. Therules alsoincludespecific requirements for firmstorecordtelephoneconversationsand electronic communications regarding client orders and dealing on own account. These must be retained for a period of at least six months.
The FCA supervises firms against therules, including on record keeping, as part of theirongoing supervisory work. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 permitsthe FCA to impose appropriate fines, which are not limited, for the contravention on a requirement imposed on them under the Act. The FCA are required to publisha policy statement setting outhow they determinethe appropriate level of financial penalty. This can be foundhere:https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/DEPP/6/1.html?date=2015-10-27.
The EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) introduced a harmonised framework for investor protection in the EU. The Government has supported a revised directive,MiFID II, which will replace itfrom 2017. MiFID IIintroducesmore detailed EU requirements on record keeping and an EU wide taping regime, aimed at strengthening investor protection and enhancing market integrity. This will also extend the period telephone conversations and electronic communications must be retained for to at least five years.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, for how long the Financial Conduct Authority requires banks to retain data records relating to financial services.
To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, for how long the Financial Conduct Authority requires banks to retain data records relating to financial services.
The Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) repeals the existing Market Abuse Directive with effect from 3 July 2016 and will have direct application in the UK. It is therefore necessary to make relevant changes to the UK’s existing domestic regime, which is set out primarily in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) Handbook, to ensure that national law complies with MAR. The necessary changes are currently being considered by HM Treasury and the FCA.
In relation to record-keeping requirements, FCA rules require investment firms and credit institutionsto maintain orderlyrecords of theirbusiness, including all services and transactions undertaken by them. These mustbe sufficient to enable the FCAto monitor the firm's compliance with its regulatory requirements and retained for a period of at least five years. Therules alsoincludespecific requirements for firmstorecordtelephoneconversationsand electronic communications regarding client orders and dealing on own account. These must be retained for a period of at least six months.
The FCA supervises firms against therules, including on record keeping, as part of theirongoing supervisory work. The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 permitsthe FCA to impose appropriate fines, which are not limited, for the contravention on a requirement imposed on them under the Act. The FCA are required to publisha policy statement setting outhow they determinethe appropriate level of financial penalty. This can be foundhere:https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/DEPP/6/1.html?date=2015-10-27.
The EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) introduced a harmonised framework for investor protection in the EU. The Government has supported a revised directive,MiFID II, which will replace itfrom 2017. MiFID IIintroducesmore detailed EU requirements on record keeping and an EU wide taping regime, aimed at strengthening investor protection and enhancing market integrity. This will also extend the period telephone conversations and electronic communications must be retained for to at least five years.