Skip to main content

1-8 of 8 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"

Primary member X
O'Hara, Brendan
Subject X
Expenditure

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Expenditure (8)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department has spent on identifying and repairing the fault that led to the Trident D5 II missile not being able to complete its test after being launched as part of the 2016 Demonstration and Shakedown Operation exercise.

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2017
Reference
62522
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what work has been carried out by the manufacturers of other Trident D5 II missiles to prevent reoccurrence since the missile was unable to complete its test after being launched as part of the 2016 Demonstration and Shakedown Operation exercise.

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2017
Reference
62523
House
House of Commons

On Friday, the National Audit Office placed a serious question mark against the Government’s 2% commitment. Its report revealed that in order to fulfil the defence equipment plan following the collapse of the pound post-Brexit, the Ministry of Defence will have to use all its £11 billion contingency fund and make a further £6 billion of savings in defence spending across the board. Given that Trident is ring-fenced, will the Secretary of State tell the country whether it will be hard-pressed defence personnel and our conventional capabilities that will bear the brunt of those cuts?

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 2017
Reference
620 c645
House
House of Commons

The National Audit Office report cast further doubt on the Type 26 programme:

“Major changes to the requirement for the Type 26 Global Combat Ship mean that costings for this…will be unclear until 2018.”

With an ageing fleet in desperate need of renewal, a looming budgetary crisis and the uncertainty caused by Brexit, cuts to numbers, and delays, how does the Secretary of State intend to make good on the promise to maintain 19 destroyers and frigates in the Royal Navy? For how much longer does he believe that the Royal Navy can respond to global threats with its current fleet?

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 January 2017
Reference
620 c646
House
House of Commons

May I begin by sending my condolences to the family and friends of Lance Corporal Joe Spencer, who was tragically killed at RAF Tain last week?

On Friday, I warmly welcomed the announcement that steel would be cut on the Type 26 frigates in summer 2017. However, I repeat my point that the contract remains unsigned, so will the Secretary of State get a move on and sign it? The defence procurement Minister said last year that Type 23s would be replaced by Type 26s on a like-for-like basis. Is that still the case?

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2016
Reference
616 c1245
House
House of Commons

Is it not the case that only the original order for 13 Type 26s would have kept the yards working until 2035? Now that there are only eight and there is no confirmation of the general purpose frigates, how can an order for just eight Type 26s secure two decades’ worth of work on the Clyde?

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2016
Reference
616 c1245
House
House of Commons

Eleventh opposition day debate (part one), on a motion in the name of the Leader of the second largest opposition party (SNP). Main question negatived on division (64 to 330).

Lead member
Brendan O'Hara
Answering member
Michael Fallon; Philip Dunne; Toby Perkins
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Opposition days
Date
24 November 2015
Reference
602 cc1200-57
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what modifications will be needed at HMNB Clyde and RNAD Coulport to accept the successor submarine programme; what estimate he has made of the cost to the public purse of adapting the ship-lift facility at HMNB Clyde to accommodate the successor to...

Asked by
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2015
Reference
9569
House
House of Commons