Skip to main content

1-20 of 310 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Publisher X
House of Commons
Subject X
Teachers

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Teachers (310)

Publisher

House of Commons (310)

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The contributions we have heard will make a real difference, but on the hon. Gentleman’s point about somebody being responsible, our constituents often tell us that they always seem to have to fight the system, which never delivers for them just as a matter of public policy. That is not...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2019
Reference
656 c346WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what the pay settlement is for teachers in 2019-20; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2018
Reference
198258
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what funding his Department has allocated to schools for the teacher`s pay settlement in 2019-20; and if will make a statement.

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 December 2018
Reference
198260
House
House of Commons

One of the best ways to support teachers in improving educational outcomes, particularly for children with special needs, is through the pupil premium. Will the Secretary of State therefore explain why the level of the pupil premium has been frozen at current levels through this Parliament?

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2016
Reference
618 c1160
House
House of Commons

Protection of Freedoms Bill. Committee stage fourteenth sitting (afternoon). Clause 60, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clauses 61 and 62 agreed to, one with amendments. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clause 63, as amended, agreed to.

Lead member
James Brokenshire; Baroness Featherstone
Answering member
Lord Coaker; Diana Johnson
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
3 May 2011
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely right about that. Of course what Lord Hill said in another place was that if we were to consider the grammar schools that become academies, we might find that that area is significantly broader. What that ““area”” meant was very difficult to define. My hon....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c771
House
House of Commons

But who will decide? It will be the head teacher and the governing body of the school. The right hon. Gentleman tells us not to worry because some consultation will take place, and he asks what head teacher would drive this through against local opposition. I just say to him...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c770
House
House of Commons

I make a prediction to the right hon. Gentleman and to some of the hon. Members on the Government Benches who are saying ““Hear, hear””. I predict that the Government will produce amendments in the Bill that they are introducing in the autumn to clarify the situation and that hon....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c771
House
House of Commons

What we are saying is that we are legislating for a process and we expect it to set out exactly what should happen. It is for the Government to determine what that process is. At the moment, they have no real idea about it. I also say to the right...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c770
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a self-evident and good point, and identifies some of the problems regarding the difference between what happened before and what will happen under the Bill's measures. There are a huge number of questions that the Minister needs to answer. On consultation, it would help if the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c775
House
House of Commons

Some local authorities have been a problem, but not just Labour authorities—Conservative local authorities have also stood in the way of academy development. One pays a price for local democracy and involving local authorities: sometimes it means that people pursue educational options in their area that one does not agree...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c774-5
House
House of Commons

I was going to make that point: schools adjudicators have been involved almost as a final route of appeal. I know from my experience as a Minister—if the hon. Member for Brigg and Goole (Andrew Percy) becomes a Minister he will find this out—that even when one thinks a decision...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c774
House
House of Commons

There are two points. I shall come back to the local point in the moment, but all the way through these discussions—the hon. Gentleman, to his credit, has been in the Chamber for many hours of the debate on the Bill—I have pointed out significant and substantial differences between the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c773-4
House
House of Commons

I think that the hon. Lady's amendment puts forward a good point. However, does not the intervention from the hon. Member for Crewe and Nantwich (Mr Timpson) highlight the problem with the process that we have to go through in that the hon. Lady could have the most brilliant idea...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c748
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a perfectly reasonable point, but the problem is that we cannot amend the Bill unless we win a vote. That is the problem with this process. Frankly, we all feel immense frustration. His point is exactly right, but we cannot amend the Bill.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c754
House
House of Commons

I do not think that it is sufficient. The hon. Gentleman is right: of course one would consult teachers, non-teaching staff and pupils differently. That is why our amendment states:"““The Secretary of State shall issue guidance as to how””" that is done. Of course the consultation will be carried out...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c772-3
House
House of Commons

It is a very good job that the Minister has persuaded me that statutory instruments of any sort—negative or affirmative—are unnecessary, otherwise he would not be able to announce academy orders in September. I intend to ask leave to withdraw the amendment, but I return to a point I made...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c794-5
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 82, page 3, line 11, at end insert—

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c792
House
House of Commons

I will be interested to hear why the Minister thinks that the amendments are unacceptable. Before that, it is important to say that, in the previous debate, there was a massive change in Government hope and expectation for their flagship academies policy. They have retreated from claiming that hundreds of...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c792
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that the Minister is just asserting things; there is no fact in what he just said. How many schools are going through this process? What are they actually doing to consult? Are they sending a letter to every parent? Are they holding parents' meetings? Are they going...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
514 c769
House
House of Commons