Skip to main content

1-20 of 23 results for answeredby:"Lord Coaker"

Publisher X
House of Lords
Subject X
Military aid

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Military aid (23)

Publisher

House of Lords (23)

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government what UK military activity has taken place in the past year in support of counter-narcotics operations in the Caribbean and Latin and South America.

Asked by
Lord Kempsell (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 January 2026
Reference
HL13239
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty’s Government what discussions they have had with their counterparts in the United States about possible future support by the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force for US boarding of sanctioned vessels.

Asked by
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1729-1732
House
House of Lords

My Lords, any future requests from the US for Royal Navy and Royal Air Force support for operations will be considered on a case-by-case basis. This includes appropriate consideration of the legal basis for any proposed activity. The MoD will continue to step up action against shadow fleet activity to protect our national security, our economy and global stability, but we cannot comment on hypothetical future operations.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1729
House
House of Lords

The unity of purpose between His Majesty’s Opposition, the Government and all Members of this House sends a hugely important and significant signal to Russia and our adversaries, so I very much welcome the first part of the noble Baroness’s question. I anticipated her question. I do not normally do this, but I want to read something because if I am not careful, I will stray into areas that would not be appropriate. I apologise to the House, but I think it is important to read something, so please forgive me if I take a little bit longer than I would normally, because the noble Baroness has made an important point.

“As we have made clear in our recent statements regarding the US military operation to interdict the MV ‘Bella 1’, the UK will not stand by as malign activity increases on the high seas. Alongside our allies, we are stepping up our response against shadow vessels, and we will continue to do so. We are fully committed to tackling the threat posed by the shadow fleet and are working with partners to maximise efforts. We will use the range of tools at our disposal to crack down on sanctions evasion and illegal maritime activity”.

I hope that goes some way to answering the noble Baroness’s question.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 cc1729-1730
House
House of Lords

My noble friend heard the careful Answer that I gave to the noble Baroness; I hope that went some way to answering the question that he has posed. It is not as though we have not been doing anything. Let me set out the facts for my noble friend; I asked for them and mentioned them a couple of days ago. As a consequence of sanctions, Russia’s oil revenues are down 27% compared with October 2024 and 544 vessels have had sanctions imposed on them by us, with 200 of these sidelined through actions taken by ourselves and our partners. So I take the noble Lord’s point about the need to go further and faster, but we are taking action, and that action has had some consequence on the Russian war machine.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1730
House
House of Lords

The noble and gallant Lord will know that we await the defence investment plan, which will lay out the capabilities that the Government believe that we need for war-fighting readiness. The noble and gallant Lord will also know that we have taken action in the Baltic to protect underwater critical infrastructure, with “Proteus” and other capabilities. He will also know that, with respect to the interdiction of the shadow vessel between Iceland and Scotland, we used RAF surveillance aircraft and reconnaissance aircraft, as well as the RFA ship. It is also worth pointing out that, notwithstanding the might of the United States, it asked for our support and help in doing what it did, and we were happy to give it.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1730
House
House of Lords

What we are doing is trying to make sure that we get it right. Even if you increase the budget by £3 billion, £4 billion or £5 billion, there will be debate about the correct way to spend that money. What is the war-fighting readiness that we need? What is the capability that we need to tackle the threats that we face? We as a Government are determined to ensure that we can fight the war of the future—that we are ready to fight the war of the future, not the war of the past. That takes decisions, that takes debate, that takes discussion, and that is what is going on.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1731
House
House of Lords

: The legal basis is the fact that these ships are operating as either false flag or stateless vessels. That gives us the legal basis. I have read the reports that the noble Lord has read, but the current situation is that that is the legal basis that we are using in relation to the stateless, flagless ships that are sanctioned. We use that as the legal basis for the actions that we either take or support.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1731
House
House of Lords

I shall not stray into that territory, because I am sure that other people are more legally qualified to answer than I am. However, the action that was taken was on the legal basis that it was a stateless, sanctioned vessel. It sailed on one flag when it was in the eastern Caribbean and, when it fled from the United States, it changed to a Russian flag. I say to the noble Lord, as I say to all noble Lords, that, when we question the United States and its willingness to take on Russia, the big strategic point that we should not lose is the fact that the United States took on a Russian-flagged shadow vessel. That should give us all comfort.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1731
House
House of Lords

I do not know about the Bill, but if the noble Baroness is referring to Greenland, the Government have been very clear that that is a matter for the Kingdom of Denmark and Greenland. There is no change in government policy on that. However, Arctic security is becoming an increasingly important challenge for the Government and for all of us. Irrespective of what the noble Baroness is really asking, dealing with that is a challenge for all of us: Arctic security is a priority and we must make sure that we defend our interests there.

Answered by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
14 January 2026
Reference
851 c1732
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to deploy a naval vessel in the Caribbean during hurricane season in addition to HMS Trent; and if so, whether that vessel will have better capabilities than HMS Trent to provide support to the relief of storm damage.

Asked by
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 2025
Reference
HL12198
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with NATO allies following the announcement that the United States intends to phase out security assistance programmes for European countries bordering Russia.

Asked by
Lord Dodds of Duncairn (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 September 2025
Reference
HL10620
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what is their policy with regard to the Ukraine war following the new policy of the government of the United States of America.

Lead member
Lord Skidelsky
Answering member
Lord Coaker
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
17 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1085-1098
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they have plans to increase military aid to Ukraine.

Asked by
Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2025
Reference
HL5218
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what resources they have provided to Ukraine through military equipment and aid since the start of the Russian invasion.

Asked by
Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2025
Reference
HL5216
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what military aid and equipment they expect to have supplied to Ukraine by the end of the 2024–25 financial year; and what military aid and equipment they have committed to supply in 2025–26.

Asked by
Lord Weir of Ballyholme (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 March 2025
Reference
HL5217
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government what proportion of the missiles manufactured by the Thales Air Defence bases in Belfast and Crossgar are transported annually to (1) Ukraine, and (2) Israel, for defensive purposes.

Asked by
Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 December 2024
Reference
HL3515
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government which UK military training courses Israeli armed forces personnel have completed in the past 12 months, and what was the location of those courses.

Asked by
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 October 2024
Reference
HL1920
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government why the United States is able to prevent the United Kingdom supplying Ukraine with Storm Shadow missiles, and whether it is able to prevent the supply of other weapons to Ukraine which do not contain parts manufactured in the United States.

Asked by
Lord Blencathra (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2024
Reference
HL1171
House
House of Lords

To ask His Majesty's Government how many Israeli armed forces personnel are being trained in the UK, which training courses they are undertaking, and at which locations these courses are taking place.

Asked by
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2024
Reference
HL1531
House
House of Lords