1-20 of 89 results for dept:"Ministry of Defence"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.293 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- dept:"Ministry of Defence"
- We searched for
- department_t:"Ministry of Defence" OR department_t:MOD OR department_ses:45998 OR answeringDept_ses:45998
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Defence Review (89)
Publisher
To comment on progress in considering the Options For Change policy which was announced on 25th July. - Ref to 178 c501W.
To comment on progress in considering the Options For Change policy which was announced on 25th July. - Ref to 178 c501W.
Asked by
Peter Viggers
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
31 October 1990
Answered on
31 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
31 October 1990
Reference
178 c628W;178 c626W
House
House of Commons
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
Baroness Quin
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c501W;178 c499W
House
House of Commons
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
Terry Patchett
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c501W;178 c499W
House
House of Commons
What further consideration has been given to Options for Change. (Failed OPQ)
What further consideration has been given to Options for Change. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
Bill Michie
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c501W;178 c499W
House
House of Commons
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
Tom Cox
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c501W;178 c499W
House
House of Commons
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
What is his timetable for the implementation of his Options for Change proposals. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
Ken Eastham
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c501W;178 c499W
House
House of Commons
What further consideration has been given to Options for Change. (Failed OPQ)
What further consideration has been given to Options for Change. (Failed OPQ)
Asked by
Terry Fields
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c501W;178 c499W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
NATO; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c858
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What reassessment has been made of the options outlined in recent defence review, in the light of developments in the Gulf.
What reassessment has been made of the options outlined in recent defence review, in the light of developments in the Gulf.
Asked by
James Cran
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Armed forces; Defence; Deployment; Iraq-Kuwait conflict; Middle East; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c858
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater
(Conservative)
Asked by
James Cran
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
What reassessment has been made of the options outlined in recent defence review, in the light of developments in the Gulf.
Subjects
Armed forces; Defence; Deployment; Iraq-Kuwait conflict; Middle East; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c858
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Asked by
Joan Ruddock
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
What are defence implications for UK of forthcoming completion of CFE talks.
Subjects
Arms control; Military aircraft; Treaties; Defence Review; CFE talks
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c862-3
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on defence review cuts & including dual-capable aircraft in CFE treaty.
1st supplementary on defence review cuts & including dual-capable aircraft in CFE treaty.
Asked by
Joan Ruddock
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Arms control; Military aircraft; Treaties; Defence Review; CFE talks
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c862-3
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Arms control; Military aircraft; Treaties; Defence Review; CFE talks
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c862-3
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on importance of maintaining defence capability & consulting service chiefs on future cuts - Incl ref to 177 c470-88
1st supplementary on importance of maintaining defence capability & consulting service chiefs on future cuts - Incl ref to 177 c470-88
Asked by
James Cran
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Armed forces; Defence; Deployment; Iraq-Kuwait conflict; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c858
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Armed forces; Defence; Deployment; Iraq-Kuwait conflict; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c858
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on defence review & Gulf conflict & implications for NATO strategy
Supplementary on defence review & Gulf conflict & implications for NATO strategy
Asked by
Lord Reid of Cardowan
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
NATO; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c858
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on defence review & Gulf conflict & calling for more information on future cuts
Supplementary on defence review & Gulf conflict & calling for more information on future cuts
Asked by
Lord O'Neill of Clackmannan
(Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Armed forces; Staff; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c859;178 c858-9
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord King of Bridgwater
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Armed forces; Staff; Defence Review
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c859;178 c858-9
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What are defence implications for UK of forthcoming completion of CFE talks.
What are defence implications for UK of forthcoming completion of CFE talks.
Asked by
Joan Ruddock
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Hamilton of Epsom
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
30 October 1990
Answered on
30 October 1990
Subjects
Arms control; Military aircraft; Treaties; Defence Review; CFE talks
Date
30 October 1990
Reference
178 c862-3
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What plans he has for the future of the Royal Navy Specialised Diving Clearance Service based in Portsmouth.
What plans he has for the future of the Royal Navy Specialised Diving Clearance Service based in Portsmouth.
Asked by
David Martin
(Conservative)
Answered by
Kenneth Carlisle
(Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
25 October 1990
Answered on
25 October 1990
Subjects
Dockyards; Navy; Portsmouth; Defence Review; Divers
Date
25 October 1990
Reference
178 c289W;178 c287W
House
House of Commons