Skip to main content

1-20 of 45 results for subject:Monarchy

Session X
1992-93

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

How HMG reconcile the Answer given by Lady Chalker of Wallasey (549 c68-9WA) with the Answer given by the Earl of Ferrers (549 c70WA) that whether the word "municipal" in article 8b of the treaty shall embrace general elections to Parliament is ultimately a matter for the European Court of...

Asked by
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 November 1993
Reference
549 c134-5WA
House
House of Lords

If increased powers given to European institutions and extension of majority voting in Council of Ministers under Maastricht Treaty will place HM the Queen in contravention of Coronation Oath whereby HM swore to govern her subjects 'according to their laws'.

Asked by
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 1993
Reference
549 c68-9WA
House
House of Lords

Statement on the outcome of his Department's analysis of the bones brought from Ekaterinburg, Russia, in July 1991 for identification. - Text of letter from Dr Janet Thompson of Forensic Science Service.

Asked by
David Atkinson (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 1993
Reference
228 c695W;228 c693W
House
House of Commons

European Communities (Amendment) Bill. Lords committee stage sixth day. New clauses considered. Clauses 2 to 8 agreed to . Bill reported without amendment.

Department
Lord Chancellor's Department; Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HL)
Date
30 June 1993
Reference
547 c808-62,872-920
House
House of Lords

That this House, noting the fundamentally undemocratic nature of the British Constitution, under which the people are in law subjects of a hereditary monarch, who has no electoral legitimacy, are bound to the Crown by absurd and meaningless oaths of allegiance and are also required to accept the indignity of...

Primary sponsor
Tony Benn (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
19 May 1993
Reference
2045
House
House of Commons

To comment on the outcome of his Department's tests at Aldermaston to identify bones brought from Russia. - Text of letter from Dr Janet Thompson of the Forensic Science Service. (Printed at 224 c552W in Daily Part)

Asked by
David Atkinson (Conservative)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 May 1993
Reference
224 c553W;224 c552-3W
House
House of Commons

Whether the Monarch is liable to VAT and/or excise duty on a similar basis to private citizens.

Asked by
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 April 1993
Reference
544 c80WA
House
House of Lords

Pursuant to 220 c19W, if he will give examples of areas where the prerogative powers residing in the Crown are not exercisable by Ministers. (Holding answer 9 March 1993).

Asked by
Graham Allen (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 March 1993
Reference
220 c655W;220 c651W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Waldegrave of North Hill (Conservative)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 March 1993
Reference
220 c660-1
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Waldegrave of North Hill (Conservative)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 March 1993
Reference
220 c660-1
House
House of Commons
What is total area of land within ownership of Duchy of Lancaster. - Inc figures.
Asked by
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 1993
Reference
220 c660-1
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on taxation of the Queen.
Asked by
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 March 1993
Reference
220 c660-1
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
24 February 1993
Reference
219 c873
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on community charge, council tax & HM Queen.
Asked by
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 February 1993
Reference
219 c873
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to his statement on 11th February, Official Report 218, column 1111-9, if Sandringham will be treated as a royal palace or as a private residence of Her Majesty the Queen. - Sandringham, which has official as well as private use, is a private asset of HM Queen.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 February 1993
Reference
219 c207W;219 c203W
House
House of Commons

Pursuant to his oral statement of 11th February,Official Report 218 col 1111-9, at which tax office the tax affairs of Her Majesty the Queen and the Prince of Wales will be administered; if any additional (a) training and (b) security measures are proposed.

Asked by
Rhodri Morgan (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 February 1993
Reference
219 c157-8W;219 c155-6W
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Notes
Received 11.02.93
Date
11 February 1993
Reference
HC 464 1992/93
House
House of Commons

Statement on royal taxation & Civil List payments. (Includes reference to Royal Trustees report - HC 464 1992/93 - and announcement of new charitable trust to manage royal art collection). (Buckingham Palace briefing on royal finances in Library at Dep 8870)

Lead member
John Major
Department
Prime Minister
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
11 February 1993
Reference
218 c1111-9;218 c1113-21
House
House of Commons

Business question on taxation, voting rights & the Queen.

Member
Harry Greenway (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
11 February 1993
Reference
218 c1121;218 c1123
House
House of Commons

Whether Treaty of Maastricht in any way whatsoever imposes any obligations or duties upon, grants to, or takes away any powers, prerogatives or privileges from, or changes the status or constitutional position of, the Monarch.

Asked by
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 1993
Reference
542 c46WA
House
House of Lords