1-20 of 167 results for subject:Sanctions
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.339 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Sanctions
- We searched for
- subject_t:Sanctions OR subject_t:Boycotts OR subject_t:"Economic sanctions" OR subject_t:Embargoes OR subject_ses:92899
Session
X
1995-96
Type
-
Early day motions (5)
+
Legislation (1)
+
Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+
Members' contributions (88)
-
Oral answers to questions (44)
-
Oral questions (44)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (8)
+
Debates (6)
-
Adjournment debates (3)
+
Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+
Statements (2)
+
Oral statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (109)
-
Oral questions (44)
-
Written questions (65)
House
Session
More
1995-96 (167)
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Statement on outcome of the General Affairs Council and the IGC ministerial meeting on 15th-16th July. - Inc fact that the A Points in Documents 9021/96 (add. 1 and add. 2), which will be placed in the Library.
Statement on outcome of the General Affairs Council and the IGC ministerial meeting on 15th-16th July. - Inc fact that the A Points in Documents 9021/96 (add. 1 and add. 2), which will be placed in the Library.
Asked by
Viscount Oxfuird
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
(Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
22 July 1996
Answered on
22 July 1996
Subjects
Cyprus; Elections; EU accession; EU action; USA; Slovenia; Sanctions; Russia; Yugoslavia; EU external relations; EU aid; Intergovernmental Conference 1996; Cuba; EU Foreign Affairs Council; Mediterranean region; Burundi
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
574 c88-90WA
House
House of Lords
Further to the Answer given by Baroness Chalker of Wallasey on 12th June 1996 (WA 168), whether they will now support the imposition of international economic sanctions against the military regime in Burma for gross violations of human rights and democratic freedoms, analogous to the international economic sanctions successfully imposed...
Further to the Answer given by Baroness Chalker of Wallasey on 12th June 1996 (WA 168), whether they will now support the imposition of international economic sanctions against the military regime in Burma for gross violations of human rights and democratic freedoms, analogous to the international economic sanctions successfully imposed...
Asked by
Lord Lester of Herne Hill
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
(Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
22 July 1996
Answered on
22 July 1996
Subjects
Human rights; Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
574 c86-7WA
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Jenkins of Putney
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Whether they will support the Danish proposal for sanctions against Burma, having regard to the widely condemned human rights record of the State Law and Order Restoration Council which governs that country.
Subjects
Human rights; Sanctions; Myanmar; Denmark
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
574 c1171
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on same.
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Lord Jenkins of Putney
(Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
22 July 1996
Subjects
Human rights; Sanctions; Myanmar; Denmark
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
574 c1171
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Human rights; Sanctions; Myanmar; Denmark
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
574 c1171
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether they will support the Danish proposal for sanctions against Burma, having regard to the widely condemned human rights record of the State Law and Order Restoration Council which governs that country.
Whether they will support the Danish proposal for sanctions against Burma, having regard to the widely condemned human rights record of the State Law and Order Restoration Council which governs that country.
Asked by
Lord Jenkins of Putney
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
22 July 1996
Answered on
22 July 1996
Subjects
Human rights; Sanctions; Myanmar; Denmark
Date
22 July 1996
Reference
574 c1171
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
What is the current policy of Her Majesty's Government towards imposing sanctions against the Burmese junta. - Ref to 281 c396.
What is the current policy of Her Majesty's Government towards imposing sanctions against the Burmese junta. - Ref to 281 c396.
Asked by
David Winnick
(Labour)
Answered by
Jeremy Hanley
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 July 1996
Answered on
19 July 1996
Mr. Winnick: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what is the current policy of Her Majesty's
Government towards imposing sanctions against the Burmese junta.[38248]
Mr. Hanley: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Minister of State the Member for Upminster (Sir N.
Bonsor), to the hon. Member for Hammersmith (Mr. Soley) on 10 July, Official Report, column 396.
Subjects
Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
19 July 1996
Reference
38248; 281 c696W
House
House of Commons
Statement on the outcome of the General Affairs Council and the IGC ministerial meeting of 15th and 16th July. - Inc ref to Documents 9021/96 - add.1 and add.2 - which will be placed in Library as soon as they are available.
Statement on the outcome of the General Affairs Council and the IGC ministerial meeting of 15th and 16th July. - Inc ref to Documents 9021/96 - add.1 and add.2 - which will be placed in Library as soon as they are available.
Asked by
Michael Brown
(Conservative)
Answered by
David Davis
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 July 1996
Answered on
19 July 1996
Mr. Michael Brown: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what was the outcome of the General Affairs
Council and the intergovernmental conference ministerial meeting of 15 and 16 July.[38630]
Mr. David Davis: The A points in Documents 9021/96--add.1 and add.2--which will be placed in the Library of the House as soon as
they are available, were approved.
The Council noted the resolutions adopted by the European Parliament in documents EP 8001/96 PE-RE45, 8162/96 PE-RE51 and 8751/96
PE-RE56.
The Council began with a televised debate on the Irish presidency programme. The President of the Council, Irish Foreign Minister
Dick Spring, presented his priorities, including preparation for European monetary union, employment, EU enlargement, the
intergovernmental Conference and work on the third pillar. My right hon. and learned Friend the Secretary of State for Foreign and
Commonwealth Affairs highlighted the need to get down to discussion of specific IGC treaty language to press ahead with reform of
the CAP and the structural fund which is necessary for enlargement, and the importance of progress in the middle east peace process.
The Council acknowledged Slovenia's letter of application for EU membership.
The Commission gave a progress report on relations with Switzerland. The Council reaffirmed the EU's wish to conclude negotiations
as soon as possible.
The Council had a wide ranging discussion on the Former Yugoslavia, including an exchange of views on the future of the EU's
presence in Mostar. The Council approved a joint action on Mostar and agreed the appointment of Sir Martin Garrod as EU special
envoy in Mostar.
The President of the Council and Commissioner Van den Broek reported on their recent visit to the region.
The Council agreed conclusions on Former Yugoslavia which note among other things that the requirements of the Florence European
Council declaration on the peace process, including that for the removal of Radovan Karadzic from the Republika Srpska political
scene, had not yet fully been complied with.
The Council reached political agreement on the MEDA regulations on aid to countries in the Mediterranean.
The Council adopted conclusions on the US "Helms-Burton" legislation on companies trading with Cuba, calling on President Clinton to
waive the provisions of title III of the Act and identifying possible counter measures.
The Council held an exchange of views on the political situation in Russia, and adopted conclusions welcoming the successful
conclusion of the presidential elections. The Council also reaffirmed its readiness to continue to contribute to the reform process
and to complete ratification of the partnership and co-operation agreement--PCA--but deciding to convey its concern over the
recurrence of violence in Chechnya and to the Russian authorities.
The Council discussed the middle east peace process.
The Council declared its concern over the continuing deterioration of the political situation in Burma and urged the State Law and
Order Restoration Council--SLORC-- to restore democracy and respect human rights. The Council reiterated its call for a full and
satisfactory explanation from the Burmese authorities of the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the death in custody of
James Leander Nichols.
The Council agreed a declaration welcoming the 10 July resolution of the Organisation of African Unity Heads of State and Government
on Burundi.
The presidency announced the appointment of Ambassador Kester Heaslip as the presidency's special representative on Cyprus.
There was a general debate on preparation for the World Trade Organisation ministerial meeting in Singapore in December. The
presidency drew procedural conclusions: the Council will return to the subject in the autumn.
On 15 July there was an IGC ministerial meeting. Foreign Ministers had a brief discussion on handling of the IGC. The Irish
presidency confirmed that there would be a special European Council in October, and that it would prepare a draft revised treaty
text for the second European Council in December.
There was also the customary briefing session with representatives of the European Parliament.
Subjects
Armed conflict; Development aid; Elections; Republic of Ireland; Sanctions; Myanmar; Russia; Yugoslavia; EU external relations; Cuba; EU Foreign Affairs Council; Mostar
Date
19 July 1996
Reference
38630; 281 c696-8W
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Fraser of Carmyllie
(Conservative)
Asked by
Viscount Montgomery of Alamein
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Whether HMG will take any action to counteract the effect of the United States Helms-Burton Act on United Kingdom trade.
Subjects
USA; Sanctions; Trade barriers; Cuba
Date
18 July 1996
Reference
574 c998
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on same.
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Viscount Montgomery of Alamein
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
18 July 1996
Subjects
USA; Sanctions; Trade barriers; Cuba
Date
18 July 1996
Reference
574 c998
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Fraser of Carmyllie
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
USA; Sanctions; Trade barriers; Cuba
Date
18 July 1996
Reference
574 c998
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether HMG will take any action to counteract the effect of the United States Helms-Burton Act on United Kingdom trade.
Whether HMG will take any action to counteract the effect of the United States Helms-Burton Act on United Kingdom trade.
Asked by
Viscount Montgomery of Alamein
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Fraser of Carmyllie
(Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
18 July 1996
Answered on
18 July 1996
Subjects
USA; Sanctions; Trade barriers; Cuba
Date
18 July 1996
Reference
574 c998
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Statement on policy on licensing arms exports to the states of the former Yugoslavia, following the lifting of the UN arms embargo.
Statement on policy on licensing arms exports to the states of the former Yugoslavia, following the lifting of the UN arms embargo.
Asked by
Lord Belhaven and Stenton
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey
(Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
15 July 1996
Answered on
15 July 1996
Subjects
Arms trade; Export controls; Slovenia; UN resolutions; Sanctions; Croatia; Yugoslavia; Bosnia and Herzegovina; North Macedonia
Date
15 July 1996
Reference
574 c39WA
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Asked by
Lord Soley
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
What work his Department is doing in co-operation with other countries to protect human rights in Burma.
Subjects
Human rights; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c396
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Human rights; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c396
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on trade.
1st supplementary on trade.
Asked by
Lord Soley
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
10 July 1996
Subjects
Human rights; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c396
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c396-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c396
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c397
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What work his Department is doing in co-operation with other countries to protect human rights in Burma.
What work his Department is doing in co-operation with other countries to protect human rights in Burma.
Asked by
Lord Soley
(Labour)
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
10 July 1996
Answered on
10 July 1996
Subjects
Human rights; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Myanmar
Date
10 July 1996
Reference
281 c396; 35174
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons