1-20 of 42 results for subject:Libya
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.276 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Libya
- We searched for
- subject_t:Libya OR subject_t:"Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya" OR subject_t:"Libyan Arab Jamahiriya" OR subject_t:"Libyan Arab Republic" OR subject_ses:11326
Session
X
1996-97
Type
+
Legislation (1)
+
Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+
Members' contributions (26)
-
Oral answers to questions (13)
+
Oral questions (13)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
+
Parliamentary committees (1)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (1)
-
House of Commons papers (1)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (2)
+
Debates (2)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (25)
+
Oral questions (13)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Written questions (12)
House
Session
More
1996-97 (42)
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Pursuant to the Answer of 26th November 1996, Official Report, column 150W, if he will comment on his latest discussions with the United States Government on Libyan sanctions; and if he will comment on changes in his Department's policy on sanctions towards Libya in each of the last four years.
Pursuant to the Answer of 26th November 1996, Official Report, column 150W, if he will comment on his latest discussions with the United States Government on Libyan sanctions; and if he will comment on changes in his Department's policy on sanctions towards Libya in each of the last four years.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
21 March 1997
Answered on
21 March 1997
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, pursuant to the answer of 26 November 1996,
Official Report, column 150, if he will make a statement on his latest discussions with the United States Government on Libyan
sanctions; and if he will make a statement on changes in his Department's policy on sanctions towards Libya in each of the last four
years. [21551]
Sir Nicholas Bonsor: UK and US Government officials discussed UN sanctions against Libya in the weeks preceding the review of
sanctions on 14 March. Both Governments remain committed to the rigorous implementation of the sanctions until Libya has complied
fully with UN Security Council resolutions 731 and 748. It remains Her Majesty's Government's policy that, since the break in
relations with Libya in 1984, we neither encourage nor discourage unembargoed trade with Libya. We support UK exporters to the
extent that our limited resources in Tripoli allow.
Libya's continued failure to surrender the two Lockerbie accused, and to comply with the other requirements of the UN Security
Council, caused the adoption of resolution 883 which imposed further sanctions effective from 1 December 1993; specifically, a
partial assets freeze, a ban on the supply of certain oil-related equipment, and a tightening of sanctions imposed by SCR 748.
UK sanctions against Libya are reviewed every four months. There has been no change in Her Majesty's Government's policy on Libya
sanctions since they were imposed, because the reasons for imposing them remain valid.
Subjects
Overseas trade; USA; Sanctions; Libya
Date
21 March 1997
Reference
21551; 292 c983W
House
House of Commons
What was the cost to public funds of the case of Regina v. Rees and Rotheroe, separately identifying the costs of lawyers' fees. - Includes fact that identifiable costs of customs investigation £20,250 and of customs lawyers £32,500. Payments so far made to counsel £7,300.
What was the cost to public funds of the case of Regina v. Rees and Rotheroe, separately identifying the costs of lawyers' fees. - Includes fact that identifiable costs of customs investigation £20,250 and of customs lawyers £32,500. Payments so far made to counsel £7,300.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
Phillip Oppenheim
(Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
21 March 1997
Answered on
21 March 1997
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the cost to public funds of the case of Regina v. Rees and Rotheroe,
separately identifying the costs of lawyers' fees. [21552]
Mr. Oppenheim: The direct identifiable costs of the customs investigation which gave rise to the case of Regina v. Rees and Rotheroe
amount to approximately £20,250. Identifiable costs of customs lawyers are approximately £32,500. In addition there will be direct
management costs which cannot be separately identified.
Payments so far made to counsel involved in the case amount to £7,300. The remaining costs of counsel for the prosecution and the
defence costs to be paid out of public funds have still to be assessed. The details cannot therefore be provided at this time.
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Costs; Arms trade; Exports; Export controls; Legal costs; Weapons; Treasury; Libya
Date
21 March 1997
Reference
21552; 292 c974-5W
House
House of Commons
Pursuant to his Answer of 19th February, Official Report Column 905W, if he will make it his policy to identify separately those representations from British firms relating to Libya which directly relate to UN sanctions.
Pursuant to his Answer of 19th February, Official Report Column 905W, if he will make it his policy to identify separately those representations from British firms relating to Libya which directly relate to UN sanctions.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
Anthony Nelson
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 March 1997
Answered on
19 March 1997
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Libya
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
19446; 292 c870-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Wednesday adjournment debate on Middle East security.
Wednesday adjournment debate on Middle East security.
Lead member
Matthew Banks
Answering member
Jeremy Hanley
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Armed conflict; Iraq; Israel; Palestine; Iran; Middle East; Peace negotiations; Libya; Gulf states
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
292 C817-37
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on Rees and Rotheroe court case.
1st supplementary on Rees and Rotheroe court case.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
19 March 1997
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Libya
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
292 c870-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Anthony Nelson
(Conservative)
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Pursuant to his Answer of 19th February, Official Report Column 905W, if he will make it his policy to identify separately those representations from British firms relating to Libya which directly relate to UN sanctions.
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Libya
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
292 c870-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Anthony Nelson
(Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Overseas trade; Sanctions; Libya
Date
19 March 1997
Reference
292 c870-1
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
If he will discuss with President Clinton the impact on sanctions against Libya of the legal actions by the United States authorities against (a) Juval Aviv and (b) Les Coleman.
If he will discuss with President Clinton the impact on sanctions against Libya of the legal actions by the United States authorities against (a) Juval Aviv and (b) Les Coleman.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
13 March 1997
Answered on
13 March 1997
Subjects
Judgements; USA; Sanctions; Libya; Aviv, Juval; Coleman, Lester K
Date
13 March 1997
Reference
18553; 292 c496
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
If he will discuss with President Clinton the impact on sanctions against Libya of the legal actions by the United States authorities against (a) Juval Aviv and (b) Les Coleman.
Subjects
Judgements; USA; Sanctions; Libya; Aviv, Juval; Coleman, Lester K
Date
13 March 1997
Reference
292 c496
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Judgements; USA; Sanctions; Libya; Aviv, Juval; Coleman, Lester K
Date
13 March 1997
Reference
292 c496
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on same.
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
13 March 1997
Subjects
Judgements; USA; Sanctions; Libya; Aviv, Juval; Coleman, Lester K
Date
13 March 1997
Reference
292 c496
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What action he has taken in respect of sanctions against Libya in the last 10 days.
What action he has taken in respect of sanctions against Libya in the last 10 days.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
12 March 1997
Answered on
12 March 1997
Subjects
Criminal investigation; Bombings; Evidence; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
12 March 1997
Reference
292 c346-7; 18306
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on the reliability of evidence presented in the case against Libya.
1st supplementary on the reliability of evidence presented in the case against Libya.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
12 March 1997
Subjects
Criminal investigation; Bombings; Evidence; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
12 March 1997
Reference
292 c346-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
What action he has taken in respect of sanctions against Libya in the last 10 days.
Subjects
Criminal investigation; Bombings; Evidence; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
12 March 1997
Reference
292 c346-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Nicholas Bonsor
(Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Criminal investigation; Bombings; Evidence; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
12 March 1997
Reference
292 c346-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Pursuant to his Answer of 28th February, Official Report, columns 419-20W, if he will put forward proposals for a bilateral extradition agreement between the United Kingdom and Libya. - (Holding answer 5 March 1997).
Pursuant to his Answer of 28th February, Official Report, columns 419-20W, if he will put forward proposals for a bilateral extradition agreement between the United Kingdom and Libya. - (Holding answer 5 March 1997).
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
6 March 1997
Answered on
6 March 1997
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his answer of 28 February, Official Report, columns 419-20, if he will put
forward proposals for a bilateral extradition agreement between the United Kingdom and Libya. [18735]
The Prime Minister: [holding answer 5 March 1997]:
No. The United Nations Security Council decided that Libya must surrender the accused for trial in Scotland or the USA.
Subjects
Bombings; Extradition; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
6 March 1997
Reference
18735; 291 c706W
House
House of Commons
Pursuant to his Oral Answer of 20th February, Official Report, column 1042, what factors led him to conclude that it was doubtful that the Libyan Government would deliver the suspects for a trial in the Hague under a Scottish judge under Scottish rules of evidence.
Pursuant to his Oral Answer of 20th February, Official Report, column 1042, what factors led him to conclude that it was doubtful that the Libyan Government would deliver the suspects for a trial in the Hague under a Scottish judge under Scottish rules of evidence.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
28 February 1997
Answered on
28 February 1997
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Prime Minister, pursuant to his oral answer of 20 February, Official Report, column 1042, what factors led
him to conclude that it was doubtful that the Libyan Government would deliver the suspects for trial in The Hague under a Scottish
judge under Scottish rules of evidence. [18209]
The Prime Minister: The Libyan Government may have said they accept the holding of the Lockerbie trial in a third country, and a
trial in The Hague is one such proposal. But they have not said that they will ensure the appearance of the accused at any such
trial. Despite agreeing in 1993 that a trial in Scotland would be fair, they have argued that they cannot compel the accused to
stand trial there, or in the United States, in the absence of a bilateral extradition agreement with either country. The same Libyan
argument would apply to The Hague, there being no extradition agreement between Libya and the Netherlands.
I conclude, after five years of Libyan prevarication over delivering the suspects for trial in Scotland, that it is extremely
doubtful that they would surrender them for trial in a third country.
Subjects
Bombings; Trials; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
28 February 1997
Reference
18209; 291 c419-20W
House
House of Commons
Adjournment debate on Libya and Iraq.
Adjournment debate on Libya and Iraq.
Lead member
Tam Dalyell
Answering member
Jeremy Hanley
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Criminal investigation; Bombings; Evidence; Iraq; Terrorism; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya; Federal Bureau of Investigation
Date
28 February 1997
Reference
291 c598-606
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on same.
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
20 February 1997
Subjects
Bombings; Evidence; USA; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
20 February 1997
Reference
290 c1042
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
John Major
(Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Bombings; Evidence; USA; Sanctions; Lockerbie; Libya
Date
20 February 1997
Reference
290 c1042
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons