1-2 of 2 results for subject:Peterlee
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.186 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Peterlee
- We searched for
- subject_t:Peterlee OR subject_ses:501611
Session
X
1996-97
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
How many staff were employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date. - Text of letter from Peter Mathison of Benefits Agency.
How many staff were employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date. - Text of letter from Peter Mathison of Benefits Agency.
Asked by
John Cummings
(Labour)
Answered by
Roger Evans
(Conservative)
Answering body
Social Security Benefits Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
19 November 1996
Answered on
19 November 1996
Mr. Cummings: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many staff were employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits
Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date. [3387]
Mr. Roger Evans: This is a matter for Peter Mathison, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. John Cummings, dated 18 November 1996:
The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many staff were
employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date.
The information requested is shown in the table below and is based on the position at the dates shown.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Peterlee Seaham
1 April 1993 111.0 47.0
1 April 1994 111.4 45.0
1 April 1995 104.5 44
1 April 1996 92.0 37.0
1 November 1996 92.0 37.0
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Figures are provisional and subject to change.
I hope you find this reply helpful.
Subjects
Civil service; Staff; Offices; Social Security Benefits Agency; Seaham; Peterlee
Date
19 November 1996
Reference
3387; 285 c521W
House
House of Commons
If he will comment on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken place in the previous 12 months in respect of these offices. - Text of letter from Peter Mathison of Social Security Benefits Agency.
If he will comment on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken place in the previous 12 months in respect of these offices. - Text of letter from Peter Mathison of Social Security Benefits Agency.
Asked by
John Cummings
(Labour)
Answered by
Roger Evans
(Conservative)
Answering body
Social Security Benefits Agency
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
18 November 1996
Answered on
18 November 1996
Mr. Cummings: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will make a statement on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee
Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken place in the previous 12 months in respect of these
offices. [3389]
Mr. Roger Evans: This is a matter for Peter Mathison, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. John Cummings, dated 15 November 1996:
The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking if he will make a
statement on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken
place in the previous 12 months in respect of these offices.
As with other Districts, North Durham District, which includes the offices at Peterlee and Seaham, is required to review the
services it provides to ensure that the most effective service is given within the resources available. There are no current plans
to close either Peterlee or Seaham offices.
Management responsibility for Seaham Branch Office will transfer from North Durham District to Wearside District with effect from
1st April 1997. It is proposed that a number of claims processing staff will transfer from Seaham Branch Office to the new
purpose-built Sunderland District Office. The service to customers at Seaham Branch Office will, however, remain unchanged.
Customers will continue to receive the full benefit service.
The provision of service to our customers has changed in the last 12 months to accommodate the introduction of JSA. This benefit is
paid and processed via Employment Services Jobcentres (ESJ). Benefits Agency staff are now employed in local ESJ premises for this
purpose at both Peterlee and Seaham. While some processing functions have been re-organised, no changes have been made in the local
service delivery to our customers during the last twelve months.
I hope you find this reply helpful.
Subjects
Offices; Social Security Benefits Agency; Seaham; Peterlee
Date
18 November 1996
Reference
3389; 285 c457W
House
House of Commons