Search Results

1-3 of 3 results for subject:Seaham

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

If he will comment on low flying by the RAF in the vicinity of Seaham on Monday 3rd and Tuesday 4th March between 12 noon and 5 p.m; if the flight paths of low-flying exercises by the RAF now incorporate the vicinity of Seaham. (Printed with incomplete answer in Daily...

Asked by

John Cummings (Labour)

Answering body

Ministry of Defence

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

19 March 1997

Reference

292 c673-4W; 19941;19944

House

House of Commons

Dept of Social Security;Social Security Benefits Agency

How many staff were employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date. - Text of letter from Peter Mathison of Benefits Agency.

Asked by

John Cummings (Labour)

Answering body

Social Security Benefits Agency

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

For answer on

19 November 1996

Answered on

19 November 1996

Mr. Cummings: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security how many staff were employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date. [3387] Mr. Roger Evans: This is a matter for Peter Mathison, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member. Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. John Cummings, dated 18 November 1996: The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking how many staff were employed in the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices in (a) 1993, (b) 1994, (c) 1995 and (d) at the latest available date. The information requested is shown in the table below and is based on the position at the dates shown. _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Peterlee Seaham 1 April 1993 111.0 47.0 1 April 1994 111.4 45.0 1 April 1995 104.5 44 1 April 1996 92.0 37.0 1 November 1996 92.0 37.0 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Figures are provisional and subject to change. I hope you find this reply helpful.

Date

19 November 1996

Reference

3387; 285 c521W

House

House of Commons

Dept of Social Security;Social Security Benefits Agency

If he will comment on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken place in the previous 12 months in respect of these offices. - Text of letter from Peter Mathison of Social Security Benefits Agency.

Asked by

John Cummings (Labour)

Answering body

Social Security Benefits Agency

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

For answer on

18 November 1996

Answered on

18 November 1996

Mr. Cummings: To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security if he will make a statement on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken place in the previous 12 months in respect of these offices. [3389] Mr. Roger Evans: This is a matter for Peter Mathison, the chief executive of the Benefits Agency. He will write to the hon. Member. Letter from Peter Mathison to Mr. John Cummings, dated 15 November 1996: The Secretary of State for Social Security has asked me to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question asking if he will make a statement on the future of the Seaham and Peterlee Benefits Agency offices; and what changes in provision of services have taken place in the previous 12 months in respect of these offices. As with other Districts, North Durham District, which includes the offices at Peterlee and Seaham, is required to review the services it provides to ensure that the most effective service is given within the resources available. There are no current plans to close either Peterlee or Seaham offices. Management responsibility for Seaham Branch Office will transfer from North Durham District to Wearside District with effect from 1st April 1997. It is proposed that a number of claims processing staff will transfer from Seaham Branch Office to the new purpose-built Sunderland District Office. The service to customers at Seaham Branch Office will, however, remain unchanged. Customers will continue to receive the full benefit service. The provision of service to our customers has changed in the last 12 months to accommodate the introduction of JSA. This benefit is paid and processed via Employment Services Jobcentres (ESJ). Benefits Agency staff are now employed in local ESJ premises for this purpose at both Peterlee and Seaham. While some processing functions have been re-organised, no changes have been made in the local service delivery to our customers during the last twelve months. I hope you find this reply helpful.

Date

18 November 1996

Reference

3389; 285 c457W

House

House of Commons

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher