Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:Shareholders

Session X
1996-97

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Finance Bill. Report stage. New clauses 8, 9, 10 and 15 debated and agreed to. New clauses 3 and 13 debated and negatived on division (264 to 296: 58 to 241). New clauses 4, 16 and 17 debated and withdrawn. New schedule 1 agreed to. Other amendments considered. Third reading...

Lead member
Michael Jack
Answering member
Lord Darling of Roulanish
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
11 March 1997
Reference
292 c152-260;292 c152-258
House
House of Commons

Finance Bill. New clause 9 (for report stage). Consortium claims for group relief. Agreed to.

Lead member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
5 March 1997
Reference
Consideration of Bill 726
House
House of Commons

What was the source of the information on shareholder identities which he used to send his letter of 28th January to shareholders in privatised companies and under what statutory provisions he obtained the information on shareholder identities which he used to send letters to shareholders of privatised companies.

Asked by
Brian Wilson (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 February 1997
Reference
291 c320W; 17954;17955
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on the future of London Underground.

Lead member
Viscount Goschen
Department
Department of Transport
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
25 February 1997
Reference
578 c1047-62
House
House of Lords

If he will estimate the number of private shareholders in (a) Northern Electric and (b) Northumbrian Water Group at (i) the date the privatisation share offers were taken up and (ii) currently. - This is a matter for the companies concerned.

Asked by
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 February 1997
Reference
16920; 291 c59-60W
House
House of Commons

What redress is available to shareholders who believe that information given by them to a utility has been revealed without their consent; and to comment on the circumstances in which a utility may divulge information given by shareholders for one purpose to a third party to be used for another...

Asked by
Ann Clwyd (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c277-8W; 15346;15344
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on wider share ownership and proposed share match scheme.
Asked by
Lord Corbett of Castle Vale (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449
House
House of Commons
What steps he is taking to promote wider share ownership.
Asked by
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c448-9; 14170
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on dangers of a windfall tax for shareholders in privatised utilities.
Asked by
Lord Bellingham (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c448-9
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on wider share ownership and need to meet inflation target.
Asked by
Lord Darling of Roulanish (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on wider share ownership and effects of windfall tax on energy prices and vulnerable consumers.
Asked by
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on effects of windfall tax on wider share ownership.
Asked by
Sydney Chapman (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449-50
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c448-9
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449-50
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c448-9
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Michael Jack (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 February 1997
Reference
290 c449
House
House of Commons

Whether British Aerospace and Rolls-Royce have asked HMG to abolish the limits they imposed on foreign shareholdings in the companies when the two groups were privatised, and if so,in favour of what foreign investors.

Asked by
Lord Kennet (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 February 1997
Reference
577 c149-50WA
House
House of Lords

What estimates he has made of the current number of private shareholders in the privatised utilities. (Failed OPQ)

Asked by
Andrew Hunter (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 1997
Reference
9533; 288 c379-80W
House
House of Commons