Skip to main content

1-20 of 185 results for subject:"Social security"

Session X
1998-99

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What percentage of working farms are in receipt of family credits or the new working families tax credit. [HL 4649]. - I regret to say that this information is not available.

Asked by
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 November 1999
Reference
HL 4649; 606 c228WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, what criteria are used to determine the countries in which United Kingdom state pensions are uprated in line with inflation; and what proposals he has to amend those criteria.

Asked by
Peter Viggers (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 1999
Reference
97897; 337 c558W
House
House of Commons

Statement on annual uprating of benefits.

Lead member
Lord Darling of Roulanish
Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
9 November 1999
Reference
337 c907-20
House
House of Commons

Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill. Lords amendments considered. Amendments 20B, 42D, 43E and 43F disagreed to, all on division. Ordered that Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons for disagreeing to these amendments and for insisting on Amendment 42A.

Type
Debates on bills
Date
9 November 1999
Reference
337 c924-53
House
House of Commons

Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill. Commons reasons considered. Lords amendments not insisted on. Commons amendment to words restored to Bill agreed to on question.

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Debates on bills
Date
9 November 1999
Reference
606 c1323-42
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, what notice Australia gave of its decision to terminate the social security agreement between Australia and the UK; and what the ramifications will be for British pensioners covered by the existing agreement.

Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 1999
Reference
97399; 337 c381-2W
House
House of Commons

Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill. Commons amendments to Lords amendments and amendments in lieu of certain Lords amendments, and Commons reasons for disagreeing to certain Lords amendments considered (Lords). Lords amendments in lieu of certain Commons amendments agreed to on division. Returned to Commons with amendments.

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Debates on bills
Date
8 November 1999
Reference
606 c1154-230
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Social Security Committee
Date
3 November 1999
House
House of Commons

Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill. Lords amendments considered. Lords amendments 1 to 191 agreed to, amendments 1, 3, 20, 33, 34, 42, 43, 46, 53, 54, 85, 93 disagreed to, most on division. Motion that Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons for disagreeing to certain amendments. Agreed to on...

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Debates on bills
Date
3 November 1999
Reference
337 c305-450
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Social Security, what estimate of the all-items RPI to September 1999 underlay his projections of social security expenditure for 2000-01; and by how much expenditure would be reduced if benefits were uprated by the actual inflation rate to September 1999. - Inc figures...

Asked by
Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 November 1999
Reference
337 c44-5W; 96299
House
House of Commons

Supplementary business question on an allocation of time motion for the Greater London Authority Bill and the debate on the Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill.

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Business questions
Date
28 October 1999
Reference
336 c1095
House
House of Commons
Member
Baroness Beckett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 1999
Reference
336 c1095
House
House of Commons
Member
Baroness Beckett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 October 1999
Reference
336 c1103
House
House of Commons

Supplementary business question on guillotine motion on Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill.

Member
Robert Syms (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
28 October 1999
Reference
336 c1103
House
House of Commons

Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill. Queens consent signified. Lords third reading (formal). Debate on amendments and motion that Bill do now pass. Passed on question and returned to Commons with amendments.

Lead member
Lord Higgins
Answering member
Baroness Hollis of Heigham
Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Debates on bills
Date
27 October 1999
Reference
606 c302-74
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Social Security Committee
Date
20 October 1999
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Social Security Committee
Notes
Received 02.11.99
Date
20 October 1999
Reference
HC 581 1998/99
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Social Security Committee
Notes
Received 02.11.99; DEBATE;CH 5 NOV 1999
Date
20 October 1999
Reference
HC 543 1998/99
House
House of Commons

Welfare Reform and Pensions Bill. Lords report stage second day. (HL Bill 93 1998/99).

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Debates on bills
Date
13 October 1999
Reference
605 c366-439,456-506
House
House of Lords

What were the total costs to the Meat Hygiene Service in the last financial year, including bonuses and social security costs, in employing official veterinary surgeons while carrying out inspection duties under EC Directive 91/497/EEC in slaughterhouses and cutting plants. [HL 3090]. - Inc figures.

Asked by
Earl of Northesk (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 October 1999
Reference
605 c36WA; HL 3090
House
House of Lords