1-20 of 103 results for subject:Infrastructure
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.333 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.008 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Infrastructure
- We searched for
- subject_t:Infrastructure OR subject_ses:91668
Session
X
1999-00
Type
-
Early day motions (1)
+
Legislation (1)
+
Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+
Members' contributions (48)
-
Oral answers to questions (24)
-
Oral questions (24)
+
Parliamentary committees (1)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (2)
-
Command papers (2)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (3)
+
Debates (2)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+
Parliamentary questions (72)
-
Oral questions (24)
-
Written questions (48)
House
Session
More
1999-00 (103)
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Type
Command papers
Author
Treasury
Laid on
22 November 2000
Notes
Received 22.11.00
Subjects
Assets; Central government; Investment; Infrastructure; Government departments; Local government; Public sector; Public expenditure; Public service; Public service agreements; Departmental expenditure limits
Commons Library location
Stats 410.32
Date
22 November 2000
Reference
Cm 4916
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, if he will list the major breakdowns on the London Underground in the last 12 months. - Includes table.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, if he will list the major breakdowns on the London Underground in the last 12 months. - Includes table.
Asked by
Tom Cox
(Labour)
Answered by
Keith Hill
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
6 November 2000
For answer on
20 November 2000
Answered on
20 November 2000
Mr. Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will list the major breakdowns on the
London Underground in the last 12 months. [137380]
Mr. Hill: This is an operational matter for London Underground (LUL) but they have provided the following information.
LUL keep a range of records of incidents on the London Underground system. They do not use the term "major breakdown" as such, but
the most appropriate measure to refer to is the record LUL have of operational or mechanical incidents which give rise to delays to
passengers of over one hour. For the purpose of answering this question a "major breakdown" is therefore taken to be an incident
which gives rise to delays to passengers of over one hour on the system, and is related to a failure of infrastructure or assets on
the system.
The table sets out, by line and by main categories of infrastructure or asset failure, the number of such incidents during the 12
months to 14 October 2000. The incidents are in practice very varied, and categories may inevitably overlap to some extent: for
example, track failures may be closely linked to signal problems, and train or track failures may be linked to power problems.
The table excludes incidents which are not related to a failure of infrastructure or assets on the system. These include a wide
range of instances: for example delays due to passengers reporting the smell of burning, or water on platforms, or broken glass roof
panels at a station.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Failures Train/signal/track Escalator Lifts Power
Bakerloo Line 19 8 36 18
Central Line 17 8 -- 8
District Line 13 -- -- 11
Jubilee and East London 8 3 -- 4
Lines
Metropolitan and Circle (C 11 -- -- 2
and H)
Metropolitan and Circle 8 3 -- 10
(Main)
Northern Line 7 48 1 16
Piccadilly Line 7 10 4 9
Victoria Line 9 73 -- 11
Waterloo and City 5 -- -- --
Total 104 153 41 89
_________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Subjects
Infrastructure; London Underground; Standards; Underground railways
Date
20 November 2000
Reference
357 c15W; 137380
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what recent reports she has received concerning the use of oil revenue from Sudanese oil fields for development projects.
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what recent reports she has received concerning the use of oil revenue from Sudanese oil fields for development projects.
Asked by
Baroness Tonge
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for International Development
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 October 2000
For answer on
13 November 2000
Answered on
13 November 2000
Dr. Tonge: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what recent reports she has received concerning the use of
oil revenue from Sudanese oil fields for development projects. [135109]
Mr. Foulkes: We have seen some evidence that revenue is being directed to investment, especially roads and power generation. The
Government of Sudan have also announced Sudanese Dinar 800m (US$ 3.118m) for development in the South through the Southern Sudan
Co-ordinating Council. We are pressing for further clarification and will keep the situation under close review.
Subjects
Capital investment; Energy; Infrastructure; Income; Oil; Roads; Sudan
Date
13 November 2000
Reference
356 c515W;356 c514W; 135109
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Stephen Timms
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Investment; Infrastructure; Transport
Date
9 November 2000
Reference
356 c431-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on business taxation and improving transport infrastructure in order to aid economic productivity.
Supplementary on business taxation and improving transport infrastructure in order to aid economic productivity.
Asked by
Nigel Beard
(Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
9 November 2000
Subjects
Investment; Infrastructure; Transport
Date
9 November 2000
Reference
356 c431-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, If he will make a statement on the action his Department has taken to assist poorer homeowners to maintain and improve their homes through grants to local authorities for home improvement agencies.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, If he will make a statement on the action his Department has taken to assist poorer homeowners to maintain and improve their homes through grants to local authorities for home improvement agencies.
Asked by
Ivan Henderson
(Labour)
Answered by
Chris Mullin
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 July 2000
For answer on
31 October 2000
Answered on
31 October 2000
Subjects
Infrastructure; Grants; Housing improvement; Roads; Repairs and maintenance
Date
31 October 2000
Reference
355 c591; 133302
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Chris Mullin
(Labour)
Asked by
Ivan Henderson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, If he will make a statement on the action his Department has taken to assist poorer homeowners to maintain and improve their homes through grants to local authorities for home improvement agencies.
Subjects
Infrastructure; Grants; Housing improvement; Roads; Repairs and maintenance
Date
31 October 2000
Reference
355 c591
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Chris Mullin
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Infrastructure; Grants; Housing improvement; Roads; Repairs and maintenance
Date
31 October 2000
Reference
355 c591
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on housing problems at Jaywick, wider infrastructure needs and Tendring District Council neighbourhood assessment study.
1st supplementary on housing problems at Jaywick, wider infrastructure needs and Tendring District Council neighbourhood assessment study.
Asked by
Ivan Henderson
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
31 October 2000
Subjects
Infrastructure; Grants; Housing improvement; Roads; Repairs and maintenance
Date
31 October 2000
Reference
355 c591
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, If he will make a statement on updating the transport infrastructure. (Failed OPQ).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, If he will make a statement on updating the transport infrastructure. (Failed OPQ).
Asked by
Ben Chapman
(Labour)
Answered by
Keith Hill
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 July 2000
For answer on
31 October 2000
Answered on
31 October 2000
Mr. Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will make a statement on
updating the transport infrastructure. [133325]
Mr. Hill: Last July we published The 10-year plan for transport. This is a £180 billion investment plan to transform our transport
system over the next 10 years, remedying decades of under-investment and stop start funding. The plan will deliver a modern,
integrated transport system fit for the 21{st} Century.
Subjects
Finance; Infrastructure; Planning; Transport
Date
31 October 2000
Reference
355 c387W; 133325
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, if he will instruct Railtrack to make the necessary infrastructure provision in order to establish a 30-minute service between Harrogate and York.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, if he will instruct Railtrack to make the necessary infrastructure provision in order to establish a 30-minute service between Harrogate and York.
Asked by
Lord Willis of Knaresborough
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Keith Hill
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 October 2000
For answer on
30 October 2000
Answered on
30 October 2000
Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions if he will instruct Railtrack to make the
necessary infrastructure provision in order to establish a 30-minute service between Harrogate and York. [135073]
Mr. Hill: No. The Secretary of State has no powers to instruct Railtrack. The provision of such infrastructure is a matter in the
first instance for Railtrack and the train operating company, Northern Spirit. Condition seven of Railtrack's network licence
requires it to maintain, renew, replace, improve, enhance and develop the network to meet the reasonable requirements of train
operators and funders. The licence is enforced by the Rail Regulator.
Subsidy may be provided to the train operator through the franchise, and, subject to the Transport Bill currently before Parliament,
the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) may procure schemes from Railtrack. To qualify for support a scheme would have to meet the SRA's
Planning Criteria.
Subjects
Infrastructure; Railway network; Travel; Harrogate line
Date
30 October 2000
Reference
355 c307-8W;355 c308W; 135073
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what assessment he has made of the transport improvements necessary to enable Picketts Lock to host the World Athletic Championships in 2005. - None. It is for the project partners to commission the appropriate assessment.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what assessment he has made of the transport improvements necessary to enable Picketts Lock to host the World Athletic Championships in 2005. - None. It is for the project partners to commission the appropriate assessment.
Asked by
David Faber
(Conservative)
Answered by
Keith Hill
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
23 October 2000
For answer on
26 October 2000
Answered on
26 October 2000
Mr. Faber: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions what assessment he has made of the transport
improvements necessary to enable Picketts Lock to host the World Athletic Championships in 2005. [134834]
Mr. Hill: None. It is for the project partners to commission the appropriate assessment.
Subjects
Infrastructure; Planning; Transport; Sportsgrounds; Lee Valley; World Athletics Championships
Date
26 October 2000
Reference
355 c171W; 134834
House
House of Commons
What is the damage impact on road infrastructure of lorry axles weighing 10.5 tonnes, 11.5 tonnes and 12.5 tonnes respectively compared with the average motor car. [HL 3764]. - Including figures.
What is the damage impact on road infrastructure of lorry axles weighing 10.5 tonnes, 11.5 tonnes and 12.5 tonnes respectively compared with the average motor car. [HL 3764]. - Including figures.
Asked by
Lord Bradshaw
(Liberal Democrat)
Answered by
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
27 September 2000
Answered on
27 September 2000
Subjects
Infrastructure; Large goods vehicles; Roads; Weight limits
Date
27 September 2000
Reference
616 c165WA; HL 3764
House
House of Lords
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what the total contribution from public funds is for transport in each year of the 10-year transport plan, and what the equivalent amounts were in each of the preceding 10 years, broken down into (a) roads, (b)...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, what the total contribution from public funds is for transport in each year of the 10-year transport plan, and what the equivalent amounts were in each of the preceding 10 years, broken down into (a) roads, (b)...
Asked by
Bernard Jenkin
(Conservative)
Answered by
Keith Hill
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
25 July 2000
For answer on
28 July 2000
Answered on
28 July 2000
Mr. Jenkin: To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1) what the total contribution from public
funds is for transport in each year of the 10-year transport plan, and what the equivalent amounts were in each of the preceding 10
years, broken down into (a) roads, (b) rail, (c) light rail and (d) other; [133462]
(2) what the annual amount is of capital investment in transport infrastructure assumed in the ten-year transport plan; and what the
equivalent amounts were in each of the preceding 10 years, broken down into (a) road, (b) rail, (c) light rail and (d) other; and
what is the amount of expenditure in each year of the 10-year transport plan. [133461]
Mr. Hill: Table A3 in Annex 1 of "Transport 2010-- The 10 Year Plan" gives a breakdown of the historic and planned public
expenditure and private investment or rail over the period 199-92 to 2010-11. I will write to the hon. Member with a breakdown of
the available roads and light rail figures in due course, and will place a copy of my letter in the Library.
Subjects
Capital investment; Finance; Infrastructure; Public expenditure; Transport
Date
28 July 2000
Reference
354 c932-3W; 133462;133461
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if he will make a statement on progress in the development of the national athletics stadium at Pickett's Lock.
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, if he will make a statement on progress in the development of the national athletics stadium at Pickett's Lock.
Asked by
David Faber
(Conservative)
Answered by
Baroness Hoey
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
19 July 2000
For answer on
24 July 2000
Answered on
24 July 2000
Mr. Faber: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport if he will make a statement on progress in the development of
the national athletics stadium at Pickett's Lock. [132369]
Kate Hoey: I chaired the first meeting of the Lee Valley Stadium Forum on 26 June. The purpose of the Forum is to keep Ministers and
interested parties up to date with developments and highlight any emerging difficulties which can then be dealt with through
separate discussions. The Forum includes representatives from the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority--the site's owners, UK
Athletics, Sport England, the Mayor of London, the London Borough of Enfield, the London Development Agency, the Government Office
for London and Transport for London. The British Olympic Association are also represented to ensure that any Olympic issues are
addressed. The next meeting of the Lee Valley Stadium Forum will be held on 2 October 2000.
The Lee Valley Regional Park Authority and UK Athletics have appointed consultants to undertake business and technical feasibility
studies for this project. Ernst & Young have been appointed to carry out a business feasibility study which will seek to identify
long-term revenue options, set out possible models for project delivery and highlight suitable management structures post World
Championships. Drivas Jonas have been appointed to conduct the various design and technical studies needed. This will include an
assessment of transport issues and environmental impacts. Both studies will be funded jointly by the National Lottery Sports Fund
and by the Lee Valley Regional Park Authority.
Subjects
Consultants; Design; Finance; Infrastructure; Planning; Sportsgrounds; Athletics; Lee Valley
Date
24 July 2000
Reference
354 c415-6W; 132369
House
House of Commons
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on North Kent Economy
Westminster Hall adjournment debate on North Kent Economy
Lead member
Jonathan Shaw
Answering member
Baroness Armstrong of Hill Top
Department
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Adjournment debates
Subjects
Infrastructure; Economic situation; Kent; Railway network; Regional planning and development; Medway; River Thames
Date
19 July 2000
Reference
354 c87-94WH
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Prescott
(Labour)
Asked by
Tony Lloyd
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, What recent discussions he has had with Virgin Trains on the rail service to Manchester and the North West. - Inc figures.
Subjects
Investment; Infrastructure; Railways; Railway network; Railtrack; Standards; West Coast main line; Virgin Trains
Date
11 July 2000
Reference
353 c681-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Prescott
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Investment; Infrastructure; Railways; Railway network; Railtrack; Standards; West Coast main line; Virgin Trains
Date
11 July 2000
Reference
353 c681-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on standard of service on West Coast line and need for investment.
1st supplementary on standard of service on West Coast line and need for investment.
Asked by
Tony Lloyd
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
11 July 2000
Subjects
Investment; Infrastructure; Railways; Railway network; Railtrack; Standards; West Coast main line; Virgin Trains
Date
11 July 2000
Reference
353 c681-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on rail infrastructure in Lincoln.
1st supplementary on rail infrastructure in Lincoln.
Asked by
Baroness Merron
(Labour)
Answering body
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
11 July 2000
Subjects
Infrastructure; Railways; Railway network; Transport; Regional development agencies; Lincoln
Date
11 July 2000
Reference
353 c690
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons