1-20 of 156 results for subject:Devolution
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.252 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.007 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Devolution
- We searched for
- subject_t:Devolution OR subject_ses:90891
Session
X
2000-01
Type
-
Early day motions (3)
+
Legislation (4)
+
Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+
Members' contributions (106)
-
Business questions (33)
-
Oral answers to questions (19)
+
Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (68)
+
Parliamentary committees (14)
+
Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (8)
-
Select Committee reports (4)
+
Parliamentary papers (4)
-
House of Commons papers (4)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (17)
+
Debates (15)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+
Committee proceedings (10)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (1)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (8)
+
Legislative debates (12)
-
Debates on bills (10)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+
Statements (1)
+
Oral statements (1)
-
Business statements (1)
+
Parliamentary questions (74)
-
Business questions (33)
+
Oral questions (19)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Written questions (22)
House
Session
More
2000-01 (156)
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Advocate General for Scotland, In what proportion of the devolution issue cases referred to her she has intervened since 3rd April. (Failed OPQ). - Includes figures.
To ask the Advocate General for Scotland, In what proportion of the devolution issue cases referred to her she has intervened since 3rd April. (Failed OPQ). - Includes figures.
Asked by
Lord McFall of Alcluith
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Clark of Calton
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 April 2001
For answer on
8 May 2001
Answered on
8 May 2001
Mr. McFall: To ask the Advocate-General in what proportion of the devolution issue cases referred to her she has intervened since 3
April. [159316]
The Advocate-General for Scotland: From 3 April to 30 April, 31 devolution issue cases have been intimated to me. Twenty two of
these related to delay in criminal proceedings. I have considered each one and judged that no intervention was appropriate.
Subjects
Criminal proceedings; Administration of justice; Devolution; Administrative delays; Scotland
Date
8 May 2001
Reference
368 c61W; 159316
House
House of Commons
To ask the Advocate General for Scotland, What criteria she applies in reaching her decisions on which devolution issue cases to intervene in. (Failed OPQ).
To ask the Advocate General for Scotland, What criteria she applies in reaching her decisions on which devolution issue cases to intervene in. (Failed OPQ).
Asked by
John Robertson
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Clark of Calton
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
24 April 2001
For answer on
8 May 2001
Answered on
8 May 2001
John Robertson: To ask the Advocate-General what criteria she applies in reaching her decisions on which devolution issue cases to
intervene in. [159317]
The Advocate-General for Scotland: I examine every devolution issue intimated to me before determining whether or not to intervene.
The criteria I apply are not rigid, and generally I intervene, at appeal or Privy Council level, where the case raises important
issues of principle for the UK as a whole. Many cases involving devolution issues raise similar points and are dealt with
satisfactorily by the lower courts and therefore I intervene less frequently at first instance.
Subjects
Administration of justice; Devolution; Scotland
Date
8 May 2001
Reference
368 c61W; 159317
House
House of Commons
Statement on whether they have offered further guidance to government departments on issues relating to devolution. [HL 2034]. - Inc fact that guidance placed in Library. (Dep 01/760).
Statement on whether they have offered further guidance to government departments on issues relating to devolution. [HL 2034]. - Inc fact that guidance placed in Library. (Dep 01/760).
Asked by
Lord Elder
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Irvine of Lairg
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
3 May 2001
Answered on
3 May 2001
Subjects
Devolution; Government departments; Northern Ireland
Date
3 May 2001
Reference
HL 2034; 624 c297WA
House
House of Lords
Statement on what further guidance has been offered to Government departments on issues relating to devolution. - Includes ref to guidance note at: http://www.cabinet - office.gov.uk/constitution/devolution/guidance/dgn.index.htm . (Dep 01/760).
Statement on what further guidance has been offered to Government departments on issues relating to devolution. - Includes ref to guidance note at: http://www.cabinet - office.gov.uk/constitution/devolution/guidance/dgn.index.htm . (Dep 01/760).
Asked by
Lord Watts
(Labour)
Answered by
Ian McCartney
(Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
2 May 2001
For answer on
3 May 2001
Answered on
3 May 2001
Mr. Watts: To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office what further guidance has been offered to Government Departments on issues
relating to devolution. [160485]
Mr. Ian McCartney: I am today placing in the Library a copy of Devolution Guidance Note 8 offering advice to Government departments
on Post-Devolution Legislation affecting Northern Ireland. This guidance note will also be made available on the Cabinet Office
Internet site at: http://www.cabinet--office.gov.uk/constitution/ devolution/guidance/ dgn. index. htm
Subjects
Devolution; Delegated legislation; Northern Ireland; Powers
Date
3 May 2001
Reference
367 c783W; 160485
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assistance was provided by the Embassy for the First Minister for Scotland during his recent visit to Washington; and what advice the First Minister received from the UK Ambassador about representation of UK regions in the embassy.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assistance was provided by the Embassy for the First Minister for Scotland during his recent visit to Washington; and what advice the First Minister received from the UK Ambassador about representation of UK regions in the embassy.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
Robin Cook
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 April 2001
For answer on
23 April 2001
Answered on
23 April 2001
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assistance was provided by the Embassy for the
First Minister for Scotland during his recent visit to Washington; and what advice the First Minister received from the UK
Ambassador about representation of UK regions in the embassy. [158133]
Mr. Robin Cook: The British Embassy in Washington provided the First Minister for Scotland with the usual assistance they would
offer to visiting Ministers. They provided a full programme of calls and the First Minister was accompanied during his visit which
included a call on the White House.
The Ambassador and the First Minister discussed the possibility of a secondment of a Scottish Executive official to the Embassy.
Additionally, the embassy has been in touch with each of the devolved administrations about their representational activity in the
United States.
Subjects
Devolution; Diplomatic service; Foreign relations; Ministers; Scotland; USA; Visits abroad; Embassies; Washington (DC); Official visits
Date
23 April 2001
Reference
158133; 367 c125W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what his policy is on providing representation in the Embassy in (a) Washington and (b) Tripoli for constituent parts of the United Kingdom. - Inc ref to 23 April 2001, 367 c125W.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what his policy is on providing representation in the Embassy in (a) Washington and (b) Tripoli for constituent parts of the United Kingdom. - Inc ref to 23 April 2001, 367 c125W.
Asked by
Tam Dalyell
(Labour)
Answered by
Robin Cook
(Labour)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
9 April 2001
For answer on
23 April 2001
Answered on
23 April 2001
Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his policy is on providing representation in
the Embassy in (a) Washington and (b) Tripoli for constituent parts of the United Kingdom. [158134]
Mr. Robin Cook: In respect of Washington, I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave earlier today (UIN 158133). Embassy staff in
staff in all our posts overseas continue to represent all the constituent parts of the UK.
Subjects
Devolution; Diplomatic service; Libya; USA
Date
23 April 2001
Reference
367 c125W; 158134
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he will publish the bilateral concordat between his Department and the National Assembly for Wales. - Includes fact that copy in Library. (Dep 01/648).
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, when he will publish the bilateral concordat between his Department and the National Assembly for Wales. - Includes fact that copy in Library. (Dep 01/648).
Asked by
Lord McCabe
(Labour)
Answered by
Jack Straw
(Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
5 April 2001
For answer on
6 April 2001
Answered on
6 April 2001
Mr. McCabe: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he will publish the bilateral concordat between his
Department and the National Assembly for Wales. [157795]
Mr. Straw: A bilateral concordat has been agreed between the Home Office and the Cabinet of the National Assembly for Wales and a
copy has been placed in the Library. The concordat sets out working arrangements for consultation, exchange of information, finance,
access to services, resolution of disputes and review of relations between the two organisations.
Subjects
Devolution; Government departments; Home Office; National Assembly for Wales; Wales; Departmental coordination
Date
6 April 2001
Reference
157795; 366 c362W
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on possibility of an English national parliament and on need to consider the appropriate powers of the Lords.
1st supplementary on possibility of an English national parliament and on need to consider the appropriate powers of the Lords.
Asked by
Lord Renton of Mount Harry
(Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 April 2001
Subjects
Devolution; British constitution; House of Lords; Reform
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
624 c719-20
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Irvine of Lairg
(Labour)
Asked by
Lord Renton of Mount Harry
(Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
What lessons they have learnt from the constitutional changes they have so far introduced.
Subjects
Devolution; British constitution; House of Lords; Reform
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
624 c719-20
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Irvine of Lairg
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Devolution; British constitution; House of Lords; Reform
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
624 c719-20
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Baroness Clark of Calton
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Administration of justice; Devolution; Scotland
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c171-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on relationship between Scottish Executive and Westminster Parliament. - Inc figures.
1st supplementary on relationship between Scottish Executive and Westminster Parliament. - Inc figures.
Asked by
Lord McFall of Alcluith
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 April 2001
Subjects
Administration of justice; Devolution; Scotland
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c171-2
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Baroness Clark of Calton
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Devolution; Scotland; Privy Council Office Judicial Committee
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c170
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on guidance on how Scottish Parliament and Civil Service should behave during Westminster general election.
Supplementary on guidance on how Scottish Parliament and Civil Service should behave during Westminster general election.
Asked by
Dominic Grieve
(Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 April 2001
Subjects
Devolution; General elections; Scotland; Scottish Parliament
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c166
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on guidance on how Scottish Parliament and Civil Service should behave during Westminster general election.
Supplementary on guidance on how Scottish Parliament and Civil Service should behave during Westminster general election.
Asked by
Dominic Grieve
(Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 April 2001
Subjects
Devolution; General elections; Scotland; Scottish Parliament
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c166-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke
(Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Devolution; General elections; Scotland; Scottish Parliament
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c166-7
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke
(Labour)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Devolution; General elections; Scotland; Scottish Parliament
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c166
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on whether it is necessary for Advocate-General to appear before Privy Council.
1st supplementary on whether it is necessary for Advocate-General to appear before Privy Council.
Asked by
Eric Joyce
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
3 April 2001
Subjects
Devolution; Scotland; Privy Council Office Judicial Committee
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c170
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Baroness Clark of Calton
(Labour)
Answering body
Advocate General for Scotland
Type
Oral answers to questions
Subjects
Devolution; Scotland; Privy Council Office Judicial Committee
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
366 c170
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
What lessons they have learnt from the constitutional changes they have so far introduced.
What lessons they have learnt from the constitutional changes they have so far introduced.
Asked by
Lord Renton of Mount Harry
(Conservative)
Answered by
Lord Irvine of Lairg
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
For answer on
3 April 2001
Answered on
3 April 2001
Subjects
Devolution; British constitution; House of Lords; Reform
Date
3 April 2001
Reference
624 c719-20
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords