Search Results

1-18 of 18 results for subject:Engineering

Show detailed: On Off

Results: 10 20 50 100

Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what steps he is taking to protect employment levels in engineering.

Asked by

David Crausby (Labour)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

2 May 2001

Reference

367 c684W; 159837

House

House of Commons

Dept of Trade and Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what targets he has set for the recruitment of engineers in the next 10 years; and what account he has taken of the current level of UCAS acceptances for engineering degrees. - Inc fig ure.

Asked by

Brian Iddon (Labour)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

27 March 2001

For answer on

10 April 2001

Answered on

10 April 2001

Dr. Iddon: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what targets he has set for the recruitment of engineers in the next 10 years; and what account he has taken of the current level of UCAS acceptances for engineering degrees. [156167] Mr. Alan Johnson: The Government do not set targets for the recruitment of engineers. However, we do listen carefully to employers when developing strategies to meet future skills needs in engineering. We also take account of statistical data and research reports from a wide variety of sources, including UCAS. The National Training Organisations (NTOs) also have a key role in providing detailed and accurate information on future skills issues across a range of sectors and we hope to see this role developed and enhanced as a result of the current consultation exercise aimed at strengthening the NTO Network. It has, however, become increasingly apparent that there is a need for improved information on the developing skills needs in engineering over the longer term, particularly in relation to the new technologies. The need for such information was recognised as a key issue for the Hawley Review of the Engineering Council set up by my noble Friend the Minister for Science and Innovation in October 1999. It is currently being considered in further detail by the Education and Training working group set up by the Engineering Council as part of the transitional arrangements for the establishment of the Engineering and Technology Board (ETB) in October 2001. Lord Trefgarne, Chairman of the Engineering and Marine Training Authority (EMTA), the National Training Organisation for engineering manufacture, chairs this group. The Government recognise the fundamental importance of maintaining an adequate flow of bright and well- motivated people into engineering and we continue to support a wide range of initiatives aimed at promoting engineering as a rewarding and challenging career. These include the Campaign to Promote Engineering (CPE) and the Science Engineering Technology Mathematics Network (SETNET). The latest initiative in this area is the Science Technology Engineering Mathematics (STEM) Delivery Programme, to which DTI has committed £6 million over the next three years. This aims to provide young people and their science teachers with access to the very best business-sponsored support materials and schemes by providing a single point of support through each Learning and Skills Council area in England (separate arrangements will apply in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland). The key objective for the programme will be to ensure that every young person in the UK under 16 should have the opportunity to experience an appropriate STEM activity at least once in each Key Stage. The STEM Delivery Programme will also include the establishment of a nation-wide Science and Engineering Ambassadors Scheme (SEAS) to encourage younger people engaged in careers in science and engineering to go back into schools to encourage others to follow them. This will be launched jointly by DTI and DfEE at the start of Science Year in September 2001.

Date

10 April 2001

Reference

156167; 366 c513-4W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will set out the terms of reference for the Science and Technology Unit to be established within his Department.

Asked by

Michael Fabricant (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

2 April 2001

Reference

156016; 366 c54-5W

House

House of Commons

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if he will include engineering within the title of the Science and Technology Unit to be established in his Department.

Asked by

Michael Fabricant (Conservative)

Answering body

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

2 April 2001

Reference

156017; 366 c54W

House

House of Commons

Are we realising our potential? Science and Technology Select Committee sixth report in 2 volumes with proceedings and appendices (evidence printed as HC 466 i-v 1999/2000). (Part 2 of 2).

Type

Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees

Committee

Science and Technology Committee

Notes

Received 03.04.01

Date

28 March 2001

Reference

HC 200 2000/01

House

House of Commons

Are we realising our potential? Science and Technology Select Committee sixth report in 2 volumes with proceedings and appendices (evidence printed as HC 466 i-v 1999/2000). (Part 1 of 2)

Type

Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees

Committee

Science and Technology Committee

Notes

Received 03.04.01

Date

28 March 2001

House

House of Commons

Dept of Trade and Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, if he will make a statement on the conclusions of the Hawley Group; what plans he has for the future role of the Engineering Council; and if he will make a statement; if he will place a copy of the...

Asked by

Michael Fabricant (Conservative)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

15 March 2001

For answer on

23 March 2001

Answered on

23 March 2001

Mr. Fabricant: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (1) if he will make a statement on the conclusions of the Hawley group; [154590] (2) what plans he has for the future role of the Engineering Council; and if he will make a statement; [154591] (3) if he will place a copy of the report by the Hawley group in the Library; [154592] (4) what assessment he has made of the impact of the work of the Hawley group on the engineering and technology base and the United Kingdom; and if he will make a statement; [154593] (5) if he will make a statement on the involvement in the Hawley group of (a) Ministers and officials in his Department and (b) officials in the Office of Science and Technology; [154594] (6) what discussions (a) he and (b) Ministers in his Department have held on the outcome of the work of the Hawley group since 1 February; and if he will make a statement. [154595] Mr. Alan Johnson: [holding answer 22 March 2001]: The Hawley group was established at the instigation of my noble Friend the Minister for Science and Innovation in October 1999. The group was chaired by Dr. Robert Hawley, Chairman of the Engineering Council, and consisted of representatives from the Engineering Council, the Department of Trade and Industry and the Department for Education and Employment. My noble Friend received regular progress reports from Dr. Hawley throughout the course of the Hawley Review and also chaired public events on 23 May 2000 and 14 February 2001. DTI officials on the group were closely involved in the development of the review and they consulted colleagues within the Department, including those in the Office of Science and Technology, on a wide range of issues. Significant contributions were also received from officials in the DETR. The Hawley group report entitled "Making the Best of Valuable Talent" was published in December 2000 and contained some 43 recommendations for re-positioning the Engineering Council to meet the needs and aspirations of an increasingly diverse and non-traditional engineering community. The report was circulated widely for discussion within the engineering community and the initial response proved most favourable. During the consultation exercise my noble Friend spoke directly to a number of senior representatives of the engineering community, from industry and from many of the engineering institutions, to seek their views on the contents of the report. All were strongly supportive. The culmination of the consultation process was a public event held at the Institution of Electrical Engineers on 14 February 2001 which was attended by senior representatives of the engineering profession, engineering industry, academia and Government. The meeting voiced its overwhelming support for the broad thrust of the report and gave a mandate for the Engineering Council to evolve into the Engineering and Technology Board. The Hawley group ceased to exist as of the end of the meeting and a series of six working groups have now been established to carry forward the process of change. We have consistently expressed our support for the aims of the Hawley Review and welcomed the proposals outlined in the Hawley report. However, ownership of the process remains firmly with the engineering community itself and the shape and remit of the new Engineering and Technology Board is a matter for them alone. We are, of course, willing to provide continued support and encouragement during the transitional phase and DTI and DfEE officials will be taking an active role in a number of working groups. The Engineering and Technology Board is due to come into existence in October 2001 and it will, therefore, be some time before a sensible assessment can be made of the impact of the new arrangements on the engineering and technology base in the UK. However, the Hawley group, led by Dr. Robert Hawley, can take a great deal of credit for initiating a wide ranging and radical assessment of the current structures within the engineering profession and encouraging a much needed debate on the future of engineering. A copy of the Hawley report has been placed in the Library of the House.

Date

23 March 2001

Reference

365 c388-9W; 154590;154591;154592;154593;154594;154595

House

House of Commons

Davies of Oldham, Lord

How many personnel funded or sponsored (or both) by the Government of Sudan are working or studying in (a) the engineering industry, and (b) power-related industries in the United Kingdom; and whether there are any implications for national security. [HL 862]. - Includes figures.

Asked by

Baroness Cox (Conservative)

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

20 March 2001

Reference

HL 862; 623 c150WA

House

House of Lords

Industrial Training Levy (Construction Board) Order 2001;Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Board) Order 2001

Draft SI on industrial training levy (Construction Board) (SI 2001/1120) Lords debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on question. (Debated with draft SI on industrial training levy (engineering construction board) (SI 2001/1121).

Lead member

Lord Davies of Oldham

Answering member

Baroness Seccombe

Type

Debates on delegated legislation

Date

7 March 2001

Reference

623 c283-8

House

House of Lords

Scotland Office

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland, What plans she has to meet representatives of the Engineering Employers' Federation in Scotland to discuss manufacturing industry. (Failed OPQ).

Asked by

Michael Fabricant (Conservative)

Answering body

Scotland Office

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

6 March 2001

Reference

364 c195W; 150740

House

House of Commons

SCIENCE AND THE GENERAL ELECTION

That this House recognises the vital role that science and engineering play in the United Kingdom and applauds the initiative taken by scientific and engineering organisations led by the Royal Society of Chemistry in promoting Science and the General Election in the Houses of Parliament on 14th February; notes that...

Primary sponsor

Michael Clark (Conservative)

Type

Early day motions

Date

12 February 2001

Reference

326

House

House of Commons

Dept of Trade and Industry

To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, what steps he is taking to address skill shortages in the engineering industry. - Includes figures.

Asked by

David Crausby (Labour)

Answering body

Department of Trade and Industry

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

24 January 2001

Reference

361 c615-6W;361 c617-8W; 146232

House

House of Commons

Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Board) Order 2001;Industrial Training Levy (Construction Board) Order 2001

Draft SIs on the industrial training levy (Engineering Construction Board) (SI 2001/1121) and (Construction Board) (SI 2001/1120).Considered by Standing Committee. (Minutes of proceedings at UP 7 2000/01). (Vote).

Type

Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings

Date

22 January 2001

Reference

1st SC on DL

House

House of Commons

Dept for Education and Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, if he will list for each year since 1990 the (a) number and (b) percentage of applicants who attended maintained schools, for degree courses at British universities in (i) law, (ii) medicine, (iii) engineering, (iv) nursing, (v) BEd teaching, (vi)...

Asked by

Ruth Kelly (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Education and Employment

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

6 December 2000

For answer on

8 January 2001

Answered on

8 January 2001

Ms Kelly: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment if he will list for each year since 1990 the (a) number and (b) percentage of applicants who attended maintained schools, for degree courses at British universities in (i) law, (ii) medicine, (iii) engineering, (iv) nursing, (v) BEd teaching, (vi) accountancy, (vii) veterinary studies and (viii) psychology. [142046] Mr. Wicks: Information for the years 1990 to 1994 is not available centrally. The available information is shown in the following table. Numbers and percentages of applicants{ 1} through UCAS to full-time and sandwich first degree courses in the United Kingdom by previous school type and subject of study _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Year of entry 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Numbers Maintained schools{ 2} Pre-clinical Medicine 3,610 3,511 3,654 3,657 3,406 Nursing 1,537 1,547 1,574 1,693 1,796 Psychology 8,859 9,159 9,183 9,206 9,367 Veterinary studies 579 581 637 629 757 Engineering{3} 10,268 9,504 9,426 9,639 9,897 Law 6,603 6,439 6,598 7,053 7,482 Accountancy 4,570 4,347 4,574 4,688 4,741 Education{4} 15,787 14,553 9,138 8,326 7,441 Independent schools Pre-clinical Medicine 2,808 2,906 2,919 2,852 2,635 Nursing 218 220 198 176 190 Psychology 2,224 2,186 2,139 2,027 2,000 Veterinary studies 344 348 355 366 380 Engineering{3} 2,954 2,713 2,727 2,565 2,526 Law 2,168 1,979 2,086 2,002 2,005 Accountancy 775 758 777 823 805 Education{4} 1,993 1,856 857 795 644 Other establishment{ 5} Pre-clinical Medicine 2,369 2,348 2,181 1,887 1,561 Nursing 2,755 2,650 2,818 2,579 2,689 Psychology 14,343 13,464 13,075 11,346 10,241 Veterinary studies 286 339 313 327 336 Engineering{3} 10,376 9,095 8,685 7,864 7,616 Law 8,261 7,883 8,137 7,614 7,332 Accountancy 4,763 4,219 4,088 3,972 3,714 Education{4} 19,858 17,957 10,737 8,803 7,838 Percentages{ 6} Maintained schools{ 2} Pre-clinical Medicine 41.1 40.1 41.7 43.6 44.8 Nursing 34.1 35.0 34.3 38.1 38.4 Psychology 34.8 36.9 37.6 40.8 43.3 Veterinary studies 47.9 45.8 48.8 47.6 51.4 Engineering{3} 43.5 44.6 45.2 48.0 49.4 Law 38.8 39.5 39.2 42.3 44.5 Accountancy 45.2 46.6 48.5 49.4 51.2 Education{4} 41.9 42.3 44.1 46.5 46.7 Independent schools Pre-clinical Medicine 32.0 33.2 33.3 34.0 34.7 Nursing 4.8 5.0 4.3 4.0 4.1 Psychology 8.7 8.8 8.8 9.0 9.3 Veterinary studies 28.5 27.4 27.2 27.7 25.8 Engineering{3} 12.5 12.7 13.1 12.8 12.6 Law 12.7 12.1 12.4 12.0 11.9 Accountancy 7.7 8.1 8.2 8.7 8.7 Education{4} 5.3 5.4 4.1 4.4 4.0 Other establishment{ 5} Pre-clinical Medicine 27.0 26.8 24.9 22.5 20.5 Nursing 61.1 60.0 61.4 58.0 57.5 Psychology 56.4 54.3 53.6 50.3 47.4 Veterinary studies 23.7 26.7 24.0 24.7 22.8 Engineering{3} 44.0 42.7 41.7 39.2 38.0 Law 48.5 48.4 48.4 45.7 43.6 Accountancy 47.1 45.2 43.3 41.9 40.1 Education{4} 52.8 52.3 51.8 49.1 49.2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Since 1996 each student has been able to make up to six applications; in 1995 each student could make up to eight applications. In the tables, applicants are counted once under each subject to which they applied. {2} Defined as sixth form centres, Comprehensive schools, Grammar schools and other secondary schools. {3} Includes general, civil, mechanical, aeronautical, electrical, electronic, production/manufacturing and chemical engineering courses. {4} Includes courses within the Education Group that lead to Qualified Teacher Status. Includes Physical Education courses in 1995 and 1996 but not in subsequent years. Since 1997 Physical Education has been available only in combination with other subjects, and combined courses are not included in the table. {5} Includes Further and Higher Education {6} The percentage of applicants excluding those with unknown previous school type.

Date

8 January 2001

Reference

360 c388-90W; 142046

House

House of Commons

Dept for Education and Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, what the social class breakdown was, in each year since 1990, of students who (a) applied for and (b) were successful in obtaining places on, degree courses at British universities in (i) law, (ii) medicine, (iii) engineering, (iv) nursing, (v)...

Asked by

Ruth Kelly (Labour)

Answering body

Department for Education and Employment

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Tabled on

6 December 2000

For answer on

8 January 2001

Answered on

8 January 2001

Ms Kelly: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment what the social class breakdown was, in each year since 1990, of students who (a) applied for and (b) were successful in obtaining places on, degree courses at British universities in (i) law, (ii) medicine, (iii) engineering, (iv) nursing, (v) BEd teaching, (vi) accountancy, (vii) veterinary studies and (viii) psychology. [142047] Mr. Wicks: Information for the years 1990 to 1994 is not available centrally. The available information for the years 1995 to 1999 is shown in the following tables. Applicants{ 1} and accepted applicants through UCAS to full-time and sandwich first-degree courses in the United Kingdom by social class and subject _________________________________________________________________________________________________. Social class Professiona Intermediat Skilled Skilled Partly Unskilled Not known Grand total l e manual non-manual skilled Year of entry 1995 Applicants{ 1} Pre-clinical medicine 3,489 3,665 879 845 554 125 490 10,047 Nursing 594 1,948 1,066 560 526 136 560 5,390 Psychology 3,726 11,205 4,806 3,444 2,303 658 2,991 29,133 Veterinary science 348 647 136 124 62 7 57 1,381 Engineering{2} 4,254 9,544 4,907 2,809 2,242 467 2,580 26,803 Law 2,919 7,598 3,062 2,259 1,462 480 2,039 19,819 Accountancy 1,171 3,978 2,216 1,510 1,064 328 1,192 11,459 Education{3} 4,199 16,010 9,306 5,338 3,811 1,002 3,840 43,506 Accepted applicants Pre-clinical medicine 1,720 1,571 280 341 167 29 127 4,235 Nursing 225 596 290 171 126 31 146 1,585 Psychology 1,015 2,671 1,055 782 502 136 673 6,834 Veterinary science 145 248 27 42 10 2 8 482 Engineering{2} 2,430 5,034 2,411 1,432 1,115 240 1,399 14,061 Law 1,541 3,570 1,272 965 592 166 793 8,899 Accountancy 424 1,381 731 538 354 108 390 3,926 Education{3} 1,285 4,605 2,442 1,513 952 214 1,014 12,025 Year of entry 1996 Applicants{ 1} Pre-clinical medicine 3,493 3,750 885 867 480 110 445 10,030 Nursing 568 1,934 981 544 521 112 582 5,242 Psychology 3,498 10,728 4,672 3,333 2,272 577 2,948 28,028 Veterinary science 377 687 134 114 53 3 43 1,411 Engineering{2} 3,874 8,558 4,257 2,498 2,068 424 2,433 24,112 Law 2,769 7,027 2,886 2,223 1,392 467 2,025 18,789 Accountancy 1,180 3,612 1,957 1,381 891 294 1,068 10,383 Education{3} 3,871 14,707 7,903 4,994 3,417 799 3,602 39,293 Accepted applicants Pre-clinical medicine 1,781 1,718 305 351 154 24 138 4,471 Nursing 253 747 311 168 160 39 157 1,835 Psychology 1,074 3,063 1,142 869 587 122 777 7,634 Veterinary science 162 240 36 33 15 1 7 494 Engineering{2} 2,307 4,834 2,255 1,342 1,065 235 1,378 13,416 Law 1,619 3,730 1,348 1,080 661 220 950 9,608 Accountancy 457 1,397 754 555 325 119 423 4,030 Education{3} 1,316 4,693 2,270 1,568 965 187 1,015 12,014 Year of entry 1997 Applicants{ 1} Pre-clinical medicine 3,349 3,664 801 831 488 112 710 9,955 Nursing 496 2,408 886 619 662 118 649 5,838 Psychology 3,179 10,728 4,206 3,505 2,432 617 2,883 27,550 Veterinary science 362 711 157 124 62 10 85 1,511 Engineering{2} 3,678 8,616 4,061 2,481 1,995 434 2,746 24,011 Law 2,622 7,458 2,835 2,412 1,472 451 2,143 19,393 Accountancy 1,086 3,790 1,912 1,524 890 269 1,226 10,697 Education{3} 1,917 8,524 4,835 3,444 2,563 508 2,453 24,244 Accepted applicants Pre-clinical medicine 1,818 1,698 294 348 187 36 196 4,577 Nursing 238 993 295 234 194 35 210 2,199 Psychology 1,082 3,332 1,136 1,125 714 147 888 8,424 Veterinary science 125 210 44 35 14 0 20 448 Engineering{2} 2,243 4,852 2,139 1,325 1,080 223 1,593 13,455 Law 1,626 4,160 1,449 1,250 722 215 1,049 10,471 Accountancy 438 1,492 751 631 355 108 554 4,329 Education{3} 610 2,580 1,245 993 723 111 656 6,918 Year of entry 1998 Applicants{ 1} Pre-clinical medicine 3,317 3,570 810 805 463 98 701 9,764 Nursing 415 2,271 856 620 674 116 827 5,779 Psychology 2,980 9,888 4,013 3,289 2,161 527 2,886 25,744 Veterinary science 378 743 141 104 68 10 110 1,554 Engineering{2} 3,447 8,317 3,946 2,331 1,995 363 2,678 23,077 Law 2,490 7,336 2,826 2,430 1,455 435 2,366 19,338 Accountancy 1,080 3,788 1,913 1,461 947 303 1,377 10,869 Education{3} 1,674 7,697 4,209 2,930 2,218 416 2,223 21,367 Accepted applicants Pre-clinical medicine 1,876 1,743 325 353 170 25 191 4,683 Nursing 201 966 282 204 209 23 245 2,130 Psychology 1,086 3,217 1,149 1,080 614 124 874 8,144 Veterinary science 164 282 24 26 13 5 31 545 Engineering{2} 2,216 4,709 2,055 1,248 1,092 179 1,457 12,956 Law 1,512 4,160 1,412 1,318 744 193 1,192 10,531 Accountancy 449 1,458 710 648 371 114 597 4,347 Education{3} 617 2,562 1,241 936 643 105 609 6,713 Year of entry 1999 Applicants{ 1} Pre-clinical medicine 2,984 3,178 731 779 406 77 877 9,032 Nursing 478 2,483 918 746 803 146 999 6,573 Psychology 2,872 9,626 3,733 3,335 2,104 492 2,690 24,852 Veterinary science 392 767 164 134 92 11 142 1,702 Engineering{2} 3,527 8,261 3,877 2,325 1,945 404 2,681 23,020 Law 2,585 7,362 2,914 2,351 1,479 420 2,456 19,567 Accountancy 1,047 3,641 1,871 1,545 861 254 1,362 10,581 Education{3} 1,495 6,806 3,785 2,718 2,049 404 2,198 19,455 Accepted applicants Pre-clinical medicine 1,875 1,756 336 399 182 19 304 4,871 Nursing 246 1,075 323 290 288 34 415 2,671 Psychology 1,088 3,364 1,083 1,058 673 142 893 8,301 Veterinary science 167 247 46 37 19 2 45 563 Engineering{2} 2,161 4,548 1,920 1,247 1,034 203 1,449 12,562 Law 1,620 4,192 1,467 1,259 754 189 1,289 10,770 Accountancy 413 1,439 740 671 343 84 549 4,239 Education{3} 541 2,428 1,284 984 776 128 756 6,897 _________________________________________________________________________________________________. {1} Since 1996 each student has been able to make up to six applications; in 1995 each student could make up to eight applications. In the tables, applicants are counted once under each subject to which they applied. {2} Includes general, civil, mechanical, aeronautical, electrical, electronic, production/manufacturing and chemical engineering courses. {3} Includes courses within the Education Group that lead to Qualified Teacher Status. Includes Physical Education in 1995 and 1996 but not in subsequent years. Since 1997 Physical Education has only been available in combination with other subjects, and combined courses are not included in the table.

Date

8 January 2001

Reference

360 c390-4W;360 c390-3W; 142047

House

House of Commons

Industrial Training Levy (Engineering Construction Board) Order 2001

Draft SI on the industrial training levy (Engineering Construction Board). (Affirmative instrument). Approved by Parliament. Made 12 March 2001 (SI 2001/1121). Coming into force 19 March 2001.

Department

Department for Education and Employment

Type

Statutory instruments

Date

21 December 2000

Reference

SI 2001/1121

House

House of Commons; House of Lords

Industrial Training Levy (Construction Board) Order 2001

Draft SI on the industrial training levy (Construction Board). (Affirmative instrument). Approved by Parliament. Made 12 March 2001 (SI 2001/1120). Coming into force 19 March 2001

Department

Department for Education and Employment

Type

Statutory instruments

Date

21 December 2000

Reference

SI 2001/1120

House

House of Commons; House of Lords

Dept for Education and Employment

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, how many modern apprenticeships there are in the engineering industry. - Inc figures. (Holding answer 11 December 2000).

Asked by

Lord Brady of Altrincham (Conservative)

Answering body

Department for Education and Employment

Type

Written questions

Status

Answered

Date

18 December 2000

Reference

360 c23W; 141696

House

House of Commons

Librarians' tools

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher