1-9 of 9 results for subject:ASW
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.178 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:ASW
- We searched for
- subject_t:ASW OR subject_t:"Allied Steel and Wire" OR subject_t:"ASW Holdings" OR subject_ses:2695
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, What discussions he has had with the National Assembly First Secretary and other Government colleagues concerning the pension situation of Welsh steel workers. (Failed OPQ)
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, What discussions he has had with the National Assembly First Secretary and other Government colleagues concerning the pension situation of Welsh steel workers. (Failed OPQ)
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, What plans he has to work with the National Assembly to help the steelmakers made redundant at Allied Steel and Wire in Cardiff. (Failed OPQ)
To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, What plans he has to work with the National Assembly to help the steelmakers made redundant at Allied Steel and Wire in Cardiff. (Failed OPQ)
Adjournment debate on pension funds. (Inc ref to green paper and technical document to be published later in year)
Adjournment debate on pension funds. (Inc ref to green paper and technical document to be published later in year)
Public petition from current and former employees of ASW Sheerness for action to ensure the restoration of the ASW Sheerness pension fund. (Circulated with the Vote 17 October 2002)
Public petition from current and former employees of ASW Sheerness for action to ensure the restoration of the ASW Sheerness pension fund. (Circulated with the Vote 17 October 2002)
That this House notes that ASW was put into receivership in July 2002; further notes that KPMG, the receivers, placed the ASW Sheerness and Cardiff pension scheme into administration with Pinsents of Birmingham; suggests that the current pension laws are irresponsible, unethical and unfair, as they only protect those employees who have retired at the expense of the current employees and other non-retired members; notes that consequently the 1000 employees who were employed up to the day of receivership, 35 per cent. of whom have over 25 years service, immediately lost access to their pension rights and will suffer a major reduction in their pension income when they retire; and consequently calls for a special pension fund allocation to be created by the Treasury or the Pensions Compensation Board to help current employees and other non-retired members who have suffered through no fault of their own when their company has been placed into receivership.
That this House notes that ASW was put into receivership in July 2002; further notes that KPMG, the receivers, placed the ASW Sheerness and Cardiff pension scheme into administration with Pinsents of Birmingham; suggests that the current pension laws are irresponsible, unethical and unfair, as they only protect those employees...