1-20 of 73 results for subject:"Legislative process"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.246 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Legislative process"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Legislative process" OR subject_ses:91826
Session
X
2003-04
Type
+
Members' contributions (31)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Oral answers to questions (14)
-
Oral questions (14)
-
Proceeding contributions (3)
+
Parliamentary committees (9)
-
Select Committee reports (8)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
+
Parliamentary papers (11)
+
House of Commons papers (7)
-
House of Commons sessional returns (1)
-
House of Lords papers (8)
+
Parliamentary proceedings (11)
+
Debates (3)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+
Legislative debates (1)
-
Debates on bills (1)
+
Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+
Statements (4)
-
Written statements (4)
+
Parliamentary questions (35)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Oral questions (14)
-
Written questions (20)
House
Session
More
2003-04 (73)
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
More
Legislative stage
Legislation
More
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Solicitor General, if she will make a statement on the Parliament Act 1949.
To ask the Solicitor General, if she will make a statement on the Parliament Act 1949.
Asked by
Tony Wright
(Labour)
Answered by
Baroness Harman
(Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Tabled on
15 November 2004
For answer on
18 November 2004
Answered on
18 November 2004
Tony Wright: To ask the Solicitor-General if she will make a statement on the Parliament Act 1949. [199102]
The Solicitor-General: The Parliament Act 1949 amended the Parliament Act 1911. The 1911 Act restricted the powers of the House of
Lords both in relation to money Bills, and Bills other than money Bills. Under the provisions of the 1911 Act, the Lords lost the
power to delay certified money Bills for more than one month and to exercise an absolute veto over other public Bills. If a public
Bill, other than, a money Bill, or a Bill extending the maximum duration of a Parliament, was passed by the Commons in three
successive sessions, with at least two years between the first Commons second reading and the Commons third reading in the third
session, it could be presented for Royal Assent by the Commons.
The Parliament Act 1949 amended the 1911 Act reducing the time periods specified in the execution of the procedure. It replaced
references to "three sessions" with "two sessions", and "two years" with "one year.
Legislation
Parliament Act 1949
Subjects
Legislative process; House of Lords; House of Commons; Powers
Date
18 November 2004
Reference
199102; 426 c1708W;426 c1712W
House
House of Commons
Statement that 'I have to inform the House that a message has been brought from the Lords as follows: The Lords insist on their amendments to the Hunting Bill, to which the Commons have insisted on their disagreement, for which insistence they assign their reasons. They insist on their amendments...
Statement that 'I have to inform the House that a message has been brought from the Lords as follows: The Lords insist on their amendments to the Hunting Bill, to which the Commons have insisted on their disagreement, for which insistence they assign their reasons. They insist on their amendments...
Member
Speaker
Type
Proceeding contributions
Subjects
Legislative process; Speaker; Royal assent; Speaker's statements
Date
18 November 2004
Reference
426 c1518
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Legislation
Constitutional Reform Bill (HL) 2003/04 to 2004/05; Mental Capacity Bill 2003/04 to 2004/05
Notes
DEB;CH 14 DEC 2004;CH 17 JAN 2005; Received 29.11.04
Subjects
Human rights; Legislative process; Parliamentary scrutiny
Commons Library location
Research HA 341.481,P (Nov 04) CS 955.1
Date
17 November 2004
Reference
HC 1282 2003/04;HL 210 2003/04
House
House of Commons
Whether the statement made by the Lord Bach on 2 November 2004, 666 c166 that, if the amendment to the Armed Forces (Pensions and Compensation) Bill to vouchsafe, after next April, continuance of the burden and standard of proof used in the current war pensions scheme for claims for war...
Whether the statement made by the Lord Bach on 2 November 2004, 666 c166 that, if the amendment to the Armed Forces (Pensions and Compensation) Bill to vouchsafe, after next April, continuance of the burden and standard of proof used in the current war pensions scheme for claims for war...
Asked by
Lord Morris of Manchester
(Labour)
Answered by
Lord Bach
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
17 November 2004
Answered on
17 November 2004
Legislation
Armed Forces (Pensions and Compensation) Bill 2003/04
Subjects
Cabinet; Legislative process; House of Lords; Eligibility; Prime Minister; Pension rights; War pensions; War widow(er)s
Date
17 November 2004
Reference
HL 4891; 666 c173WA
House
House of Lords
Supplementary business question on the Middle East peace process, gambling tax and the Constitution Select Committee report on 'Parliament and the legislative process'.
Supplementary business question on the Middle East peace process, gambling tax and the Constitution Select Committee report on 'Parliament and the legislative process'.
Member
Lord Tyler
(Liberal Democrat)
Type
Business questions
Subjects
Legislative process; Gambling; Peace negotiations; Taxation; Constitution Committee; Armed forces; Crimes of violence; Anniversaries; Civil service; Immigration; EU accession; EU enlargement; Ethnic groups; India; Legislative drafting; Public bills; Referendums; North East; Arctic; Sikhs; Military decorations; Scotland; Religion; World War II; Regional government; Russia; Veterans
Date
11 November 2004
Reference
426 c928-9
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Member
Phil Woolas
(Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Subjects
Legislative process; Gambling; Peace negotiations; Taxation; Constitution Committee; Armed forces; Crimes of violence; Anniversaries; Civil service; Immigration; EU accession; EU enlargement; Ethnic groups; India; Legislative drafting; Public bills; Referendums; North East; Arctic; Sikhs; Military decorations; Scotland; Religion; World War II; Regional government; Russia; Veterans
Date
11 November 2004
Reference
426 c928-9
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Constitution Committee
Notes
Received 18.11.04; Received 18.11.04
Subjects
Devolution; Delegated legislation; Legislative process; Legislative competence; Legislative drafting; Powers; Public bills; Public bodies; National Assembly for Wales; Parliamentary scrutiny; Scotland; Wales; Scottish Parliament
Date
3 November 2004
Reference
HL 192 2003/04
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Chris Leslie
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Asked by
David Leslie Taylor
(Labour)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what recent assessment has been made of the constitutional implications of the use of the Parliament Act 1911.
Legislation
Parliament Act 1911
Subjects
Legislative process; Parliamentary procedure
Date
26 October 2004
Reference
425 c1284
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Debate on a motion to take note of the Procedure Committee report on programming of legislation (HC 325 2003/04 ) and the government response (HC 1169 2003/04) and to amend the orders of the House. Amendments negatived on divisions. Main question agreed on division (261 to 173).
Debate on a motion to take note of the Procedure Committee report on programming of legislation (HC 325 2003/04 ) and the government response (HC 1169 2003/04) and to amend the orders of the House. Amendments negatived on divisions. Main question agreed on division (261 to 173).
Lead member
Lord Hain
Answering member
Oliver Heald
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Subjects
Debates; Legislative process; House of Commons; Public bills; Parliamentary procedure; Parliamentary scrutiny; Timetabling of bills; Procedure Committee; Standing committees; Standing orders; House of Commons sessional orders
Date
26 October 2004
Reference
425 c1308-95
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what recent assessment has been made of the constitutional implications of the use of the Parliament Act 1911.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what recent assessment has been made of the constitutional implications of the use of the Parliament Act 1911.
Asked by
David Leslie Taylor
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answered by
Chris Leslie
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Tabled on
22 October 2004
For answer on
26 October 2004
Answered on
26 October 2004
Legislation
Parliament Act 1911
Subjects
Legislative process; Parliamentary procedure
Date
26 October 2004
Reference
425 c1284; 193529
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Chris Leslie
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Oral answers to questions
Legislation
Parliament Act 1911
Subjects
Legislative process; Parliamentary procedure
Date
26 October 2004
Reference
425 c1284
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on whether we need a new Parliament Act setting out powers of delay and time limits for the passage of Bills.
1st supplementary on whether we need a new Parliament Act setting out powers of delay and time limits for the passage of Bills.
Asked by
David Leslie Taylor
(Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
26 October 2004
Legislation
Parliament Act 1911
Subjects
Legislative process; Parliamentary procedure
Date
26 October 2004
Reference
425 c1284
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
House
House of Commons
Whether, in response to doubts expressed inside and outside Parliament, they propose to introduce legislation to validate the Parliament Act 1949. [HL 4484]. - No.
Whether, in response to doubts expressed inside and outside Parliament, they propose to introduce legislation to validate the Parliament Act 1949. [HL 4484]. - No.
Asked by
Lord Brightman
(Crossbench)
Answered by
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
25 October 2004
Answered on
25 October 2004
Legislation
Parliament Act 1949
Subjects
Legislative process; House of Lords; House of Commons; Powers
Date
25 October 2004
Reference
HL 4484; 665 c103WA
House
House of Lords
Whether they have given consideration to the doubts expressed inside and outside Parliament concerning the validity of the Parliament Act 1949. [HL 4483]. - Inc ref to 19 January 2004, 620 c1328.
Whether they have given consideration to the doubts expressed inside and outside Parliament concerning the validity of the Parliament Act 1949. [HL 4483]. - Inc ref to 19 January 2004, 620 c1328.
Asked by
Lord Brightman
(Crossbench)
Answered by
Lord Falconer of Thoroton
(Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
For answer on
25 October 2004
Answered on
25 October 2004
Legislation
Parliament Act 1949
Subjects
Legislative process; House of Lords; House of Commons; Powers
Date
25 October 2004
Reference
HL 4483; 665 c103WA
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Legislation
Hunting Bill 2003/04
Subjects
Compensation; Administrative delays; Human rights; European Convention on Human Rights; Legislative process; Hunting; Regulation
Date
20 October 2004
Reference
665 c775-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on same.
1st supplementary on same.
Asked by
Viscount Bledisloe
(Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Answered on
20 October 2004
Legislation
Hunting Bill 2003/04
Subjects
Compensation; Administrative delays; Human rights; European Convention on Human Rights; Legislative process; Hunting; Regulation
Date
20 October 2004
Reference
665 c775-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Legislation
Hunting Bill 2003/04; Civil Partnership Bill (HL) 2003/04
Notes
Received 01.11.04
Subjects
Human rights; Legislative process; Parliamentary scrutiny
Commons Library location
CS 955.1
Date
20 October 2004
Reference
HC 1187 2003/04;HL 182 2003/04
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers;
Parliamentary committees
Committee
Procedure Committee (HL)
Notes
Received 28.10.04; Received 28.10.04
Subjects
Debates; Legislative process; House of Lords; Legislative drafting; Parliamentary procedure; Parliamentary scrutiny; Ministers; Select committees; Committee stage; Recess; Times of sittings; Oral questions; Carry-over motions; Financial procedure; House of Lords Grand Committee
Date
20 October 2004
Reference
HL 184 2003/04
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
Asked by
Viscount Bledisloe
(Crossbench)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Whether the requirement (under the Human Rights Act 1998) for a Minister to state that a Bill is compatible with the European Convention was met in the case of the Hunting Bill when the Lord Whitty indicated at Second Reading on 12 October (HL Deb, col. 258) that he had made the statement of compatibility on the basis of an amendment which might thereafter be made to the Bill.
Legislation
Hunting Bill 2003/04
Subjects
Compensation; Administrative delays; Human rights; European Convention on Human Rights; Legislative process; Hunting; Regulation
Date
20 October 2004
Reference
665 c775-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords
Whether the requirement (under the Human Rights Act 1998) for a Minister to state that a Bill is compatible with the European Convention was met in the case of the Hunting Bill when the Lord Whitty indicated at Second Reading on 12 October (HL Deb, col. 258) that he had made the statement of compatibility on the basis of an amendment which might thereafter be made to the Bill.
Whether the requirement (under the Human Rights Act 1998) for a Minister to state that a Bill is compatible with the European Convention was met in the case of the Hunting Bill when the Lord Whitty indicated at Second Reading on 12 October (HL Deb, col. 258) that he had made the statement of compatibility on the basis of an amendment which might thereafter be made to the Bill.
Asked by
Viscount Bledisloe
(Crossbench)
Answered by
Lord Whitty
(Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Procedure
Topical questions (HL)
For answer on
20 October 2004
Answered on
20 October 2004
Legislation
Hunting Bill 2003/04
Subjects
Compensation; Administrative delays; Human rights; European Convention on Human Rights; Legislative process; Hunting; Regulation
Date
20 October 2004
Reference
665 c775-6
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
House
House of Lords