1-20 of 36 results for subject:"Train operating companies"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.304 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Train operating companies"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Train operating companies" OR subject_t:TOCs OR subject_t:"Train operating units" OR subject_ses:93315
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Railways Bill. Consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendments to which Commons have disagreed not insisted on. Lords amendments to which Commons have disagreed not insisted on and Commons amendments in lieu agreed to.
Railways Bill. Consideration of Commons amendments and reasons. Lords amendments to which Commons have disagreed not insisted on. Lords amendments to which Commons have disagreed not insisted on and Commons amendments in lieu agreed to.
Railways Bill. Lords third reading debate. Amendment 1 to clause 13 agreed to on division (149 to 127). Amendments 2 to 7 agreed to. Amendment 8 agreed to on division (158 to 135). Passed on question and returned to the Commons with amendments.
Railways Bill. Lords third reading debate. Amendment 1 to clause 13 agreed to on division (149 to 127). Amendments 2 to 7 agreed to. Amendment 8 agreed to on division (158 to 135). Passed on question and returned to the Commons with amendments.
Railways Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendment 1 to clause 13 disagreed to on division (198 to 63). Lords amendments 2 to 7 disagreed to. Lords amendments 8-13 agreed to. Lords amendment 14 to schedule 4 disagreed to. Amendments (a) to (e) in lieu of Lords amendment 14 agreed to. Lords amendments 15-17 agreed to. Committee appointed to draw up reasons for disagreeing to Lords amendments. Reasons reported and agreed to. Message to the Lords to communicate reasons with Bill and amendments.
Railways Bill. Consideration of Lords amendments. Lords amendment 1 to clause 13 disagreed to on division (198 to 63). Lords amendments 2 to 7 disagreed to. Lords amendments 8-13 agreed to. Lords amendment 14 to schedule 4 disagreed to. Amendments (a) to (e) in lieu of Lords amendment 14 agreed...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether he plans to waive penalty payments for train operating companies involved in industrial disputes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether he plans to waive penalty payments for train operating companies involved in industrial disputes.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department will be assuming powers previously exercised by the Strategic Rail Authority in respect of (a) waiving penalty payments for train operators involved in industrial disputes, (b) providing compensation to train operating companies for loss of revenue arising from industrial...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department will be assuming powers previously exercised by the Strategic Rail Authority in respect of (a) waiving penalty payments for train operators involved in industrial disputes, (b) providing compensation to train operating companies for loss of revenue arising from industrial...
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what funds he has set aside to compensate train operating companies in the event of industrial disputes on the railways in the 2004-05 financial year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what funds he has set aside to compensate train operating companies in the event of industrial disputes on the railways in the 2004-05 financial year.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much was paid, and on which dates, through the Strategic Rail Authority to train operating companies in respect of compensation for loss of revenue during industrial disputes in each of the last three years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much was paid, and on which dates, through the Strategic Rail Authority to train operating companies in respect of compensation for loss of revenue during industrial disputes in each of the last three years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, where responsibility will lie for the collection of penalty payments from train operating companies once the Railways Bill comes into force.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, where responsibility will lie for the collection of penalty payments from train operating companies once the Railways Bill comes into force.
Written Statement on the establishment of Network Rail as the single point of responsibility for rail industry performance as from 4 April 2005.
Written Statement on the establishment of Network Rail as the single point of responsibility for rail industry performance as from 4 April 2005.
Railways Bill. Lords Committee stage third day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 34,36-57 agreed to. Clauses 35,58,59 agreed to as amended. Schedules 9,10,11,13 agreed to. Schedule 12 agreed to as amended. New clauses considered.
Railways Bill. Lords Committee stage third day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 34,36-57 agreed to. Clauses 35,58,59 agreed to as amended. Schedules 9,10,11,13 agreed to. Schedule 12 agreed to as amended. New clauses considered.
Railways Bill. Lords Committee stage second day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 5-33 agreed to. Schedules 4,5,6,7,8 agreed to.
Railways Bill. Lords Committee stage second day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 5-33 agreed to. Schedules 4,5,6,7,8 agreed to.
Railways Bill. Lords Committee stage first day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 1, 2, 3, 4 agreed to. Schedules 1, 2, 3 agreed to.
Railways Bill. Lords Committee stage first day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 1, 2, 3, 4 agreed to. Schedules 1, 2, 3 agreed to.
That this House notes Strategic Rail Authority plans to review service and fare levels on the Northern Rail franchise; is concerned that the review will lead to higher fares, replacing off-peak rail services with buses, line closures and job losses; further notes that the Northern Rail franchise has only operated since December 2004; believes the SRA assurances that the new franchise would 'deliver greater value for money to taxpayers' and 'bring to an end any remaining uncertainty over the future shape of rail services in the North of England' have been cast in serious doubt; and urges the Government to use its powers under the Railways Bill to oppose any line closures, job cuts and bustitution proposals which may arise as a result from the review.
That this House notes Strategic Rail Authority plans to review service and fare levels on the Northern Rail franchise; is concerned that the review will lead to higher fares, replacing off-peak rail services with buses, line closures and job losses; further notes that the Northern Rail franchise has only operated...
What proportion of Network Rail's income for the current year is expected to come (a) direct from the public sector; (b) from revenue from passenger train operators; and (c) from revenue from the private sector [HL 620]. - Ref to 10 February 2005, 430 c93-6WS.
What proportion of Network Rail's income for the current year is expected to come (a) direct from the public sector; (b) from revenue from passenger train operators; and (c) from revenue from the private sector [HL 620]. - Ref to 10 February 2005, 430 c93-6WS.
Written Statement on rail spending. (Inc tables).
Written Statement on rail spending. (Inc tables).
Lords Written Statement on rail spending. (Inc tables).
Lords Written Statement on rail spending. (Inc tables).