Skip to main content

1-4 of 4 results for subject:Intimidation

Session X
2004-05

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill. Lords Committee stage. Clauses 1-3, 5-9, 11-6, 18-45, 47-60, 62-70, 72-4, 76-112,114-23, 125-8, 132-41, 144-66, 168-9 agreed to. Clauses 10 and 124 disagreed to. Clauses 4, 17, 46, 61, 71, 75 , 113, 129, 130-1, 142-3, 167, 173-4 agreed to as amended. Schedules 1-3,...

Lead member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Answering member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
Department
Home Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
5 April 2005
Reference
671 c595-652,677-713
House
House of Lords

Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill. Lords second reading debate. Agreed to on question and committed to a Committee of the Whole House. (Part 1 of 2)

Lead member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal
Answering member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
14 March 2005
Reference
670 c1077-93,1106-98
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps he has taken to investigate the allegations of Surrey Police concerning intimidation of witnesses stationed at Deepcut Barracks by uniformed members of the Royal Military Police.

Asked by
Kevin McNamara (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 February 2005
Reference
208381; 431 c960W;431 c956W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what steps the Department has taken to publicise the availability of special measures for witnesses in the criminal courts.

Asked by
Vera Baird (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2004
Reference
203874; 428 c877W
House
House of Commons