1-20 of 35 results for subject:Misconduct
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.305 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.006 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Misconduct
- We searched for
- subject_t:Misconduct OR subject_t:Malpractice OR subject_t:"Professional misconduct" OR subject_ses:92051
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
Inquiries Bill (HL). Consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments debated and agreed to. Privilege amendment agreed to.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Consideration of Commons amendments. Commons amendments debated and agreed to. Privilege amendment agreed to.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Queens consent signified. Third reading debate. Agreed to on question and passed with amendments.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Queens consent signified. Third reading debate. Agreed to on question and passed with amendments.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Committee stage second sitting (afternoon). Clauses 5, 6, 8 to 25 agreed to. Clause 11 agreed to as amended. Clause 7 disagreed to.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Committee stage second sitting (afternoon). Clauses 5, 6, 8 to 25 agreed to. Clause 11 agreed to as amended. Clause 7 disagreed to.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what disciplinary procedures apply when claims of misconduct against a traffic commissioner are substantiated.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what disciplinary procedures apply when claims of misconduct against a traffic commissioner are substantiated.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) dismissed from employment in the Office in each year since 2001 for gross professional misconduct.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) dismissed from employment in the Office in each year since 2001 for gross professional misconduct.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) dismissed from employment in the Office in each year since 2001 under suspicion of having breached the Official Secrets Act 1989.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) dismissed from employment in the Office in each year since 2001 under suspicion of having breached the Official Secrets Act 1989.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on Committal, Standing Committee, Report, Third Reading and any other proceedings agreed to on question (formal). Queens recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed to on question (formal). Relevant documents: HC 51 2004/05, Cm 6481, HC 606 i-vii 2003/04, HC 51 i-iii 2004/05 and HC 388 2004/05.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Second reading debate. Agreed to on question. Programme motion on Committal, Standing Committee, Report, Third Reading and any other proceedings agreed to on question (formal). Queens recommendation signified. Money resolution agreed to on question (formal). Relevant documents: HC 51 2004/05, Cm 6481, HC 606 i-vii 2003/04, HC...
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) sacked from employment by his Department in each year since 2001 for gross professional misconduct.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) sacked from employment by his Department in each year since 2001 for gross professional misconduct.
Charities Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage sixth day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 11,12,14,15-17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31,32 agreed to. Clauses 13,28 agreed to as amended. Schedule 5 agreed to. Schedule 6 under consideration. New clauses considered.
Charities Bill (HL). Lords Committee stage sixth day. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses Room). Clauses 11,12,14,15-17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31,32 agreed to. Clauses 13,28 agreed to as amended. Schedule 5 agreed to. Schedule 6 under consideration. New clauses considered.
Ruling that "The hon. Member for Hackney, North and Stoke Newington (Ms Abbot) should not be using a mobile phone in the House;she should really know that by now".
Ruling that "The hon. Member for Hackney, North and Stoke Newington (Ms Abbot) should not be using a mobile phone in the House;she should really know that by now".
How many councillors have been suspended or disqualified as a result of complaints to the Standards Board for England in each month since it was set up; and which authorities they serve on. [HL 1538]. - The information requested has been made available in the Library of the House.
How many councillors have been suspended or disqualified as a result of complaints to the Standards Board for England in each month since it was set up; and which authorities they serve on. [HL 1538]. - The information requested has been made available in the Library of the House.
Debate on a motion to suspend for one year from 1 April 2005 support relating to travel allowances for Members who have chosen not to take their seats.Amendments negatived on divisions (170 to 358; 171 to 357). Main question agreed on question.
Debate on a motion to suspend for one year from 1 April 2005 support relating to travel allowances for Members who have chosen not to take their seats.Amendments negatived on divisions (170 to 358; 171 to 357). Main question agreed on question.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many civil servants were suspended or sacked from employment by his Department under suspicion of breaching the Official Secrets Act 1989 in each year since 2001.
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, how many civil servants were suspended or sacked from employment by his Department under suspicion of breaching the Official Secrets Act 1989 in each year since 2001.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) sacked in each year since 2001 for gross professional misconduct; and in which department each was employed.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) sacked in each year since 2001 for gross professional misconduct; and in which department each was employed.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) sacked in each year since 2001 under suspicion of breaching the Official Secrets Act 1989; and in which department each was employed.
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many civil servants were (a) suspended and (b) sacked in each year since 2001 under suspicion of breaching the Official Secrets Act 1989; and in which department each was employed.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Privilege amendment made. Bill passed and sent to the Commons.
Inquiries Bill (HL). Lords third reading debate. Agreed to on question. Privilege amendment made. Bill passed and sent to the Commons.
That this House is concerned that KPMG has been developing, marketing and selling sometimes by cold-calling, VAT avoidance schemes which it knew would be `unacceptable', and which it admits in its marketing document are suspect by saying that `In our view HM Customs and Excise will regard these planning arrangements as "unacceptable tax avoidance" and will seek to challenge the arrangements'; notes that, contrary to all the rules of professional bodies, the firm sold the schemes on a contingency fee basis; observes that the firm has already been condemned by the US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations and is being prosecuted by various authorities for selling illegal tax avoidance schemes in the US; and therefore urges the Government to investigate KPMG and other accountancy firms engaging in such dubious activities in the UK urgently to introduce stronger measures against the schemes and, where necessary to close down firms selling illegal tax avoidance schemes that enable companies to escape their tax obligations in this country and burden everyone else with higher taxes as a result.
That this House is concerned that KPMG has been developing, marketing and selling sometimes by cold-calling, VAT avoidance schemes which it knew would be `unacceptable', and which it admits in its marketing document are suspect by saying that `In our view HM Customs and Excise will regard these planning arrangements...
Debate on a motion to (i) approve the third report of the Committee on Standards and Privileges session 2004/05 (HC 233) and (ii) accordingly suspend Mr Jonathan Sayeed from the service of the House for two weeks. Resolved.
Debate on a motion to (i) approve the third report of the Committee on Standards and Privileges session 2004/05 (HC 233) and (ii) accordingly suspend Mr Jonathan Sayeed from the service of the House for two weeks. Resolved.