Skip to main content

1-20 of 130 results for member:"Lord Jenkin of Roding"

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, if the noble Lord had been kind enough to pronounce my name correctly, I would have much more sympathy with what he is saying. It has no ““s”” on the end. I have listened to the Minister with care and I think he is construing regulatory functions altogether...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1295
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have Amendments Nos. 31 and 32 in this group. We have listened to two powerful speeches that argued for different amendments to strengthen the oversight of subordinate legislation by Parliament. My wish in relation to this measure is that we should not use the negative procedure at...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1365
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was well aware that if we got into the detail a hornets’ nest may well buzz around our heads. The Minister may be interested to know that this amendment was suggested by the Christian lawyers association, which I have no doubt whatever will read his response with...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1392
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 39: Page 20, line 34, after ““Church of England”” insert ““or any other religious organisation”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I think I can promise noble Lords that I shall be briefer than I was when I moved my previous amendment. All I want to do...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1391
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Third Reading.

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1310
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 5: Page 2, line 2, leave out from ““department”” to end of line 3. The noble Lord said: My Lords, my amendment to Clause 1(4) would remove the words, "““unless it affects the Minister or department in the exercise of a regulatory function””." The 2001 Act specifically...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1296-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have listened carefully to what the Minister has said. I would have thought that in all the examples that he gave there would clearly be burdens on other people and, therefore, there could be no difficulty with making orders under the Bill to reduce those burdens. I...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1298
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2: Page 1, line 8, at end insert ““in the exercise of a regulatory function”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, as the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, mentioned, the Bill had a very inauspicious start in another place. It aroused widespread suspicion and was christened by some...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1292-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, no opposition Back-Bencher can hope to dredge up examples of the detailed effect of the earlier legislation in the way that the collective memory of a government department can. I heard what the noble Lord said. We will obviously need to think about this but, in the mean...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1300
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 7: Page 2, line 15, at end insert ““and does not include any legislation (whether or not in force) which was passed at least one year before the day on which the order is made”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, the amendment seeks to bring back...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1298
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister reminded us that if either House uses the veto powers, that is the end of the matter and the thing has to be dealt with by primary legislation. He also made it clear that the powers to sub-delegate can be given only to bodies for which...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1358
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 19: Leave out Clause 4. The noble Lord said: My Lords, Clause 4 has aroused some controversy. Whereas the rest of the Bill envisages amendments, repeals and so on, this clause allows subordinate legislation to be made by this order. The House of Commons First Special Report...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1355-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad the noble Countess is able to enjoy the benefits of homeopathic remedies, even if she does not know why. I find these regulations very disturbing, as the noble Lord, Lord Taverne, has already outlined. I referred back to Complementary and Alternative Medicine, the report in...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1333-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister repeated the Statement, I was struck by how many of the recommendations that form part of it closely mirror what the Select Committee of this House said some seven years ago, in a report under the chairmanship of the noble Lord, Lord Tombs. However, there...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 October 2006
Reference
685 c1218
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not think that there is much difference between my noble friend and me on that. What I say from my study of this subject is that for many pupils the academic study of three separate sciences would be difficult. The Nuffield Foundation writes: "““Alongside our scientific...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1109-10
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise to the House because this is the first time I have addressed it on the Education and Inspections Bill. Noble Lords who were in the Chamber earlier will realise that I do so with a particular interest in the new science syllabus, Twenty First Century Science....

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1108-9
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I very much welcome the Government’s support. In some ways, it goes back to the Science and Society report of this House, which contained a whole chapter on the need to reform the science syllabus in schools. The Minister referred to the piloting, which has been extremely successful and warmly welcomed by head teachers and science teachers in a great many schools. Does he accept that the new syllabus can offer pupils the choice of doing three separate science subjects, and is that not one of its very valuable points? However, does he also accept that, if this is to work successfully, more resources will need to go into giving teachers the money and the time to undertake continuous professional development?
Asked by
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1084-5
House
House of Lords
Whether they support the introduction of the new science syllabus for schools, Twenty First Century Science; and whether progress in getting the syllabus into schools is satisfactory.
Asked by
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
24 October 2006
Reference
685 c1084
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord but that was not me. It was the south-east electricity authority.

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2006
Reference
685 c485
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry. My name is Jenkin without an ““s”” and has been so for the past 80 years.

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 October 2006
Reference
685 c328
House
House of Lords