Skip to main content

1-20 of 4,127 results for subject:Devolution

Session X
2005-06

Type

-
Early day motions (4)
+ Legislation (13) + Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (4)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (3,976)
-
Business questions (8)
-
Maiden speeches (8)
-
Oral answers to questions (75)
-
Oral question time interventions (8)
+ Oral questions (89)
-
Prime Minister's questions (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,804)
+ Parliamentary committees (27) + Committee proceedings (22)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
-
Select Committee reports (3)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (2)
+ Parliamentary papers (12)
-
Command papers (3)
-
House of Commons papers (7)
-
House of Lords papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (75) + Debates (57)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (22)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (4)
+ Legislative debates (50)
-
Debates on bills (39)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (11)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (14) + Oral statements (8)
-
Ministerial statements (8)
-
Written statements (6)
+ Parliamentary questions (148)
-
Business questions (8)
+ Oral questions (89)
-
Prime Minister's questions (6)
-
Written questions (51)
+ Petitions and observations (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

When they commissioned the signage referring to an agreement which was used at the St Andrews summit on 13 October.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 November 2006
Reference
7741; 686 c200-1WA
House
House of Lords
Type
Command papers
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
Cm 6963
House
House of Commons

Whether the St Andrews agreement is binding in international law; and whether it has the same status as the 1998 Belfast agreement.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
8078; 686 c149WA
House
House of Lords

What proposals they have to ensure that the Ulster-Scots language obtains equality and parity of esteem with Irish in any arrangements resulting from the discussions at St Andrews.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
7913; 686 c155WA
House
House of Lords

Whether they have the power to cap or change the rating system in the event that power is devolved to an Administration in Northern Ireland.

Asked by
Lord Laird (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
8002; 686 c113WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Scotland what recent devolution issues the Advocate-General has considered.

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Answering body
Scotland Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c1014W; 99097
House
House of Commons

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that an appropriate check on ministerial abuse should be established within the Standing Orders of the Regulatory Reform Committee, to the effect that it should have a clear and unambiguous duty to determine whether something is an inappropriate use of delegated legislation? Is not...

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c754
House
House of Commons

I hesitate to make promises about parliamentary time. My hon. Friend will be aware that that matter is not solely under my control. I hope that he will acknowledge, however, that the approach that we have taken so far has been to consult the relevant Select Committee Chairs on these...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c762
House
House of Commons

This issue has been bubbling around during the time my hon. Friend has been dealing with the Bill and before that. For the avoidance of doubt, will he give the House a clear assurance that time will be set aside by the Government to enable us to debate the necessary...

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c761-2
House
House of Commons

The amendments deal with an issue that is close to the heart of many right hon. and hon. Members who debated the Bill in its earlier parliamentary stages. They fulfil our commitment, made on Second Reading in the other place, to look again at the criteria for the parliamentary Committees’...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c761
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c761
House
House of Commons

By leave of the House, Mr. Deputy Speaker, I should like to clarify this issue for the right hon. Gentleman. The prohibition on an order reducing tax would not stop an order reducing fees, including fees charged by a regulator, for example. Lords amendment agreed to. Lords amendments Nos. 19...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c761
House
House of Commons

As someone who would dearly love to see some taxes abolished, I accept the normal form for doing that. Unfortunately, we have an annual Finance Bill, and it is an increasingly large Bill under this Government. It gives them ample legislative opportunity to make changes to taxes. I would like...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c761
House
House of Commons

Yes, that is correct. I meant that the amendment will allow Committees of either House to exercise their veto. It is vital that we strike the right balance between the order-making powers in the Bill and effective safeguards. We hope that, by framing the veto in this way, we will...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c762
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with the Lords in the said amendment.

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c759
House
House of Commons

I really must continue. I believe that in respect of the presentation of the amendment, we have seen a downplaying, if not an ignorance, of the protections in the Bill. Let me deal with the matter of the Scotland Act 1998. It was not exempt from the 2001 Act and...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c755-6
House
House of Commons

We mentioned the matters covered by the amendments earlier, so I shall be brief. Clause 6 restricts the powers in clauses 1 and 2. It prevents an order from imposing or increasing taxation. Concerns were raised on Report in the Commons and in Committee in the other place that, unamended,...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c760
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman has come up with a very good idea. My idea was that the House authorities might like to advise the Chair of the Committee. The Minister might be able to consider a proposition that falls between the two. If we are not to be offered anything like...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c754
House
House of Commons

I will endeavour to be brief in summing up the debate on a couple of key issues. First, as the hon. Members for Somerton and Frome (Mr. Heath) and for Cambridge (David Howarth) said, the courts can be involved even without the amendment. I acknowledged that in my opening remarks,...

Member
Pat McFadden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c755
House
House of Commons

If the amendment were carried, would it still be possible under this accelerated procedure to abolish a regulator or a regulatory requirement that might include a fee or licence charge?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
451 c760
House
House of Commons