Skip to main content

1-20 of 36 results for subject:Monarchy

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on unstarred question on what is their assessment of the prospects for peace and parliamentary democracy in Nepal.

Lead member
Earl of Sandwich
Answering member
Lord Triesman
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c978-98
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, congratulate and thank the noble Earl, Lord Sandwich, on securing this debate at a very important and timely juncture. Within the space of three months earlier this year, Nepal moved from an absolute monarchy, through widespread and largely peaceful demonstrations, to an interim government. Nepal is now...

Member
Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c984-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join with others in thanking the noble Earl, Lord Sandwich, for bringing this issue before us today and reminding us of the very significant interests which we in this country should have, and seek to have, in the affairs of Nepal. From my list of the most important interests,...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c991-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Earl, Lord Sandwich, for raising the important issue of peace and democracy in Nepal and to all noble Lords who have taken part in a very significant debate. I admire the noble Earl’s first-hand knowledge and the penetrating analysis that he has provided, to...

Member
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c993-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I warmly congratulate the noble Earl, Lord Sandwich, on securing this timely debate on the situation in Nepal, a country which, as he says, deserves more attention than the House has given it in the past. It will probably receive more attention as a result of the noble Earl having...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c981-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too am grateful to the noble Earl, Lord Sandwich, for securing the debate and opening it so effectively. As he mentioned, I was privileged to be part of the group of six which visited Nepal in March, supported by the Foreign Office and led most ably by Sir John Stanley,...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c989-91
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too would like to thank and congratulate my noble friend Lord Sandwich for keeping these critical developments in Nepal in your Lordships’ mind, and indeed in that of the Government—just in case they feel, although I am sure they will not, that with all their other serious preoccupations in the...

Member
Lord Bramall (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c986-9
House
House of Lords

rose to ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their assessment of the prospects for peace and parliamentary democracy in Nepal. The noble Lord said: My Lords, I am grateful for this opportunity to speak about Nepal at a critical time in its history. It is encouraging to see in his place the...

Member
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2006
Reference
683 c978-81
House
House of Lords
My Lords, will the Minister join me in congratulating the United Nations on the peacekeeping role that it has played in Nepal and particularly in extending those congratulations to Mr Ian Martin?
Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327
House
House of Lords
My Lords, in the light of the strong economic and historical ties between India and Nepal, what discussions have the Government had with the Government of India about restoring democracy in Nepal?
Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327
House
House of Lords
My Lords, does the Minister agree that for the moment the best thing that His Majesty the King of Nepal can do is to stay out of sight, say nothing and do nothing, and to let others get together to try to find practical and workable solutions to Nepal’s problems—our friend Nepal—which we will so warmly welcome and, I hope, support.
Asked by
Lord Bramall (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we certainly do all that we can to encourage the earliest possible elections to a constituent assembly and the negotiations which are needed between the warring parties in Nepal. Some useful steps have been taken forward in what is quite a fragile position. The peace talks that started with the Maoists on 26 May were a good start. The reality is that the Maoist forces have to be brought into a political process, and that involves them renouncing violence. There is no place for people to engage in political processes while retaining arms and using them.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c326-7
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I can certainly confirm that. My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for International Development is currently considering, with other donors and United Kingdom government departments, how to respond to the new position. Consideration is being given to financial and technical support for the peace process through the interdepartmental Global Conflict Prevention Pool. The total planned bilateral DfID assistance for 2006–07 is £30 million.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, can the Minister confirm that the Department for International Development has a lot of experience of conflict resolution and that it is already active without waiting for free elections to the constituent assembly?
Asked by
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327-8
House
House of Lords
My Lords, it has been a valuable role. India has been specifically mentioned by Members of this House but the role of the United Nations in holding the ring has been very valuable. It is due the congratulations that the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, has described.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327
House
House of Lords
My Lords, that is an absolutely accurate observation. India has the greatest influence in Nepal, although of course other international interlocutors are involved as well. We have been in discussion with the Government of India. I believe that they share precisely the objective of seeing early elections, a solid constitutional platform and then a definition of the long-term role of the monarchy.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327
House
House of Lords
My Lords, regardless of whether I make that commendation to the King of Nepal from this Dispatch Box, I think that he has drawn the same conclusion as the noble and gallant Lord has advocated.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c327
House
House of Lords
My Lords, we recognise from our own experience how a constitutional monarchy can serve as a symbol of national pride and a force for unity and stability. However, it is for the people of Nepal to decide the future of their monarchy. We therefore welcome the Government of Nepal’s intention to hold elections to a constituent assembly, whose representatives will have the task of drafting the new constitution.
Answered by
Lord Triesman (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c326
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that helpful reply. The people of Nepal have taken a very bold step towards multi-party democracy and a return to stable government. At present they are also preserving a ceremonial monarchy. Bearing in mind the Government’s long friendship with Nepal and, as the Minister said, our own political experience, should we not encourage the Government of Nepal to move swiftly on to a UN-monitored ceasefire and to free elections, and to resist the Maoist call for the abolition of the monarchy?
Asked by
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c326-7
House
House of Lords
Whether they continue to support the constitutional monarchy in Nepal.
Asked by
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
15 June 2006
Reference
683 c326
House
House of Lords