Skip to main content

1-20 of 230 results for subject:Trees

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I must inform the hon. Lady that that particular area is probably 12 to 14 miles away and it has no bearing on the quality of life of local people. I am grateful for the Minister’s clarification, specifically with regard to the Human Rights Act, as well as on many...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1192
House
House of Commons

No; it is in the borough.

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1191
House
House of Commons

We seem to have gone from a beautiful oak tree, which we all wish to protect, to perhaps the most contentious subject of debate in the House. The evidence does not back up the hon. Gentleman’s point in respect of pressure on housing. It is the wheres, whens and hows...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1188
House
House of Commons

In the Minister’s list of things that are causing pressures on housing, such as divorce and demographics, he missed out immigration. I am sure that that was a casual slip. In an answer to my hon. Friend the Member for Isle of Wight (Mr. Turner) a while ago, the Government...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1188
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is trying to hold me and the Government responsible for the decisions of local authorities. There are many examples of local authorities turning down proposals to develop gardens on the basis of existing planning guidance, let alone the future planning guidance to which I referred. The Government...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1189
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, I shall make a few brief points, so that we can move on to another important Bill that is worthy of discussion. Before I go through some of the comments that Members have made, I want to say a big thank you to every...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1189-91
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for explaining why this is such a hot issue. I understand that, and I have constituents who have said it to me, but if she will allow me to finish my argument we might have a better understanding of the situation. The Government’s intention, when...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1187-8
House
House of Commons

I reiterate the point that the interplay of that guidance and the Government’s desire to increase housing density has put the pressure on. If I might say so, also involved is the loose wording of the planning guidance, which allows developers to produce blocks of one and two-bedroom flats that,...

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1187
House
House of Commons

Indeed, that is the intention. I have some more, even better, news for the right hon. Gentleman: in September this year, my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government announced a community ownership and management review, to consider how we can take such issues forward...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1185-7
House
House of Commons

The valuable initiative to which the Minister refers is, presumably, helpful not only in the case of parks, but in the case of museums, too. In my constituency, the Conservative-controlled borough council wants to close the borough museum, but community initiatives such as those that he describes might be an...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1185
House
House of Commons

I think we can all sign up to that. [Hon. Members: ““Can we quote you?””] Hon. Members can more than quote me, as I have said it before. The hon. Gentleman said that these matters should be left to the local authority. That, of course, is precisely the point made...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1180
House
House of Commons

I believe in local democracy. If a local authority were to decide that, it would face the consequences at the following local elections. Bradford council is, fortunately, led by a Conservative administration that would not make such a stupid decision, and would be more likely to turn down such proposals....

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1181
House
House of Commons

I will ensure that the Conservative association in Solihull has a copy of the hon. Gentleman’s comments. He said that if electors do not like an administration’s policies, they can change it at the next election. The logical implication is that he profoundly disagrees with what is being done in...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1181-5
House
House of Commons

I am confident that when the Deputy Prime Minister announced the new policy on increasing density—

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1180
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker. Perhaps I can make my point in commenting on specific clauses in the Bill, as this is directly relevant to them. I was responding to the remarks of the hon. Member for Shipley, who said that there should not be reams of bureaucracy coming down...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1180
House
House of Commons

Hear, hear.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1180
House
House of Commons

I do not wish to turn this into a dialogue, but I do not think that the two are at all contradictory. If the central Government diktats on housing density were removed, local people would be quite responsible enough, and sufficiently involved in their own areas, to make their own...

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1180
House
House of Commons

I understand the hon. Lady’s point, but there is a contradiction at the heart of it. She criticises the regional assembly as she sees it, and then refers to national impositions. She cannot have it both ways. The Leader of the Opposition recently delivered some heavy criticism of the Government’s...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1179-80
House
House of Commons

Of course I understand the hon. Gentleman’s argument, and to be fair, I must admit that he did mention residential planning in his speech. However, his comments prompt a question to which I shall return later, and which is also relevant to what was said by the hon. Member for...

Member
Phil Woolas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1179
House
House of Commons

When recommending more housing and planning powers for regional assemblies and the Mayor of London, the Minister should perhaps take account of the informal arrangements that are developing among local authorities to enable them to control the agenda rather than accepting it from central Government.

Member
Jacqui Lait (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2006
Reference
450 c1179
House
House of Commons