Skip to main content

1-20 of 262 results for subject:Utilities

Session X
2005-06

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

moved Amendment No. 20: Page 4, line 26, leave out from ““impose”” to end of line 27 and insert ““, abolish or vary any tax”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendment No. 21. Clause 5 restricts the powers in Clauses 1 and 2, preventing...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1358-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I assure the noble Viscount that we will not let the matter rest here, and my noble friend Lord Bassam and I will keep him abreast, both before and after Third Reading, of what ensues from our debate.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1383
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I supported the noble Viscount in Committee when he moved a similar amendment. I said at that time that, having served with him on the Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee, I had always been immensely impressed by the amount of work that he put in to trace the...

Member
Lord Desai (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1379
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 36: Page 17, line 9, at end insert- ““(1B) Where subordinate legislation creates any new or amended criminal offence the subordinate legislation shall contain, in the text and not solely by reference to a provision of the Community instrument, a description of the conduct which, if proved,...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1375-9
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 35: Page 15, leave out lines 14 and 15 and insert ““modified or supplemented from time to time.”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clause 28 [Power to make ambulatory references to Community instruments]:

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1375
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as my noble friend Lord Norton commented, it is lack of action that is the problem. I think it is regrettable that the transparency which this amendment would introduce is not to be pursued by the Government as it would enable any lack of action or action to...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1375
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my genuine thanks to the noble Viscount, Lord Colville of Culross, for his diligence and persistence on this issue and for the useful examples of good and bad practice which he brought to our attention in Committee and again today. I readily acknowledge that we did...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1381-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that slightly complicates what I intended to say. The report of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Davidson, is about gold-plating, which is a function of directives, not regulations. As I understand it, regulations are instruments that, when issued on a certain date by the European Community, are...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1380-1
House
House of Lords

Or directives.

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1379
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was not tasked by my Front Bench to reply to this amendment, and I find myself somewhat shaken to have to do so. Unfortunately, I missed the noble Viscount in Committee; I was probably one of those who took an early train home. However, as I understand...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1379
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Lord, Lord Howard of Rising, for introducing the amendment, and the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, for his contribution. Although we are unable to accept it, I have an opportunity to explain what the Government are doing in this area. Amendment...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1374-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am entirely in favour of consolidation; there is too little of it at the moment, and it would be a great help if it were available in some shape or form. I dare say that it will be on the website but, never mind, that is better...

Member
Viscount Colville of Culross (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1382-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we share the view of the Joint Committee on Human Rights and support the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, again for the reasons that he has already given.

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1372
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 33: After Clause 20, insert the following new clause- ““APPLICATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 Orders made under this Part shall be treated for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998 (c. 42) as subordinate legislation and not as primary legislation (whether or not they amend...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1371-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to have that negative reply to what seems a useful amendment. During this debate, it has become apparent that Amendments Nos. 29 and 33 are quite closely linked and should probably have been grouped. If I bring back Amendment No. 29, as I suggested I...

Member
Lord Goodhart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1373
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, in proposing this amendment, seeks strangely to replicate a similar provision in the Civil Contingencies Act. There is a considerable difference between orders made under that Act and orders made under the Bill, in that the former have only a...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1372-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this amendment for the reasons given by the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, and have nothing further to add.

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1369
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, to which I have added my name. I moved a similar amendment in Committee, but the noble Lord’s is better drafted. As we are on Report, I did not intervene in response to the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1369
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I always admire the telegraphic style of the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland. It is most helpful on this occasion. Before I turn to this specific amendment, it may assist the House if I first address some confusion about the interpretation of the Human Rights Act that arose in...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1369-71
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 34: After Clause 20, insert the following new clause- ““PUBLICATION OF DEPARTMENTAL PROGRESS (1) A Minister of the Crown must make available to the public in an accessible format- (a) all proposals promoting regulatory principles or removing or reducing burdens received by his government department; (b) his...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2006
Reference
685 c1373-4
House
House of Lords