Skip to main content

1-20 of 102 results for subject:Leave

Session X
2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what rules or guidelines his Department has in place governing the length of time that NHS employees are allowed to take paid leave on (a) compassionate and (b) other grounds; what the overall maximum period is for which paid leave will be...

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 October 2007
Reference
157737; 464 c1058-9W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many NHS staff were given time off for treatment for either alcohol or drug abuse in each of the last five years.

Asked by
Lord Mann (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
156672; 464 c522W
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I certainly understand that many Members of your Lordships’ House are not particularly happy with the model of reform which the other place has voted for and which the Government have said they wish to put into operation. Of course, I understand that Members of this House wish...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c539
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Bill is highly preferable to the proposals in the Statement yesterday and the forthcoming White Paper for a predominantly or fully elected House. Looking at the Bill overall, I approve of the establishment of a statutory Appointments Commission, a facility for a permanent leave of absence and...

Member
Lord Northbrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c519-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by reminding your Lordships of Macaulay’s comment on the Plantagenets. He said that the Plantagenet kings were restrained by a powerful and hereditary aristocracy. The hereditary aristocracy was there not because of heredity but to stop an appointed House. Macaulay and the Norman barons were right,...

Member
Earl of Onslow (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c517-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is good to follow a self-confessed ridiculous character in the modern world but one who nevertheless adds very much to our deliberations. He spoke on the generality of the principles. It is clear that the Bill does not rule out an ultimate stage. This is a staging...

Member
Lord Anderson of Swansea (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c518-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords may remember that at the Third Reading of the House of Lords Bill in 1999, I sat weeping the whole time. I am certain that my noble friend Lord Strathclyde will not forget, because he had to give me his hankie. All I can remember is...

Member
Baroness Miller of Hendon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c513
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Steel, on introducing the Bill, which is the product of the Campaign for an Effective Second Chamber. I declare an interest as one of its founder members, and I pay my own tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth,...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c511-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, like others in your Lordships’ House, I welcome the Bill and the opportunity that it gives us, once again, to express the widespread view that the House of Lords is not irretrievably broken and thus need not be radically fixed. I would like to address honours in general...

Member
Baroness D'Souza (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c511
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as one of the very first batch of the new breed nominated by the Stevenson Commission for the Cross Benches, it will not surprise any of your Lordships to know that I support the Steel Bill wholeheartedly. In addition, I suppose that I could call on my experience...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c516-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wholly endorse the Bill. It represents an excellent opportunity to make progress and I wish to make only two points. The first is that the Bill has clear cross-party support among Back-Benchers. That is obvious. The need to move ahead on the basis of consensus between the...

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c515-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the spotlight is on this House in two very different ways today because of the Bill of my noble friend Lord Steel—I hope that I can all him that—which I basically support, and the announcement by the Crown Prosecution Service, following which questions must be asked and answered....

Member
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c514-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am a very enthusiastic supporter of the Bill of the noble Lord, Lord Steel of Aikwood, because its proposed measures to take reform forward are apt as to timing and purpose, they are well thought through and relatively uncomplicated. For that, we owe a great debt to...

Member
Lord Grenfell (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c513-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to speak in support of the Second Reading of this Bill. I pay tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Steel of Aikwood, for the timely Bill and for the manner in which it is framed. Yesterday, the Bill was dismissed, first, as not providing a...

Member
Lord MacKenzie of Culkein (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c521
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the Bill as a positive, timely and useful initiative towards making progress on a problem that has been outstanding for so long. It is not going to go away, and we should grasp the opportunity now to make real progress towards a solution. The Bill recognises...

Member
Lord Clyde (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c520-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that this Bill be now read a second time. I am cheered to see so many Members here on a Friday. At the beginning, I make it clear that this is not a Liberal Democrat Bill, as no doubt my noble friend Lord McNally...

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c483-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty, having been informed of the purport of the House of Lords Bill, has consented to place her prerogative and interest, so far as they are affected by the Bill, at the...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c483
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my mother used to tell me that I spoke too quickly and I may now be about to prove it. I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Steel, on the powerful and, I believe, compelling case that he has made for the Bill. The Bill delivers on those parts...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c488-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Steel, has presented an impeccable case for the Bill. I associate myself with his remarks about Sir Patrick Cormack, who is here, and the noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth. Since we put forward the idea about a year ago they have had an...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c487-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Lea provided for me what I thought was the nightmare scenario; that is, the unrobing of Jack Straw’s committee by some sort of seven veils striptease. However, at the end of his speech, I merely reflected that, however this committee is described, it does...

Member
Lord Tomlinson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 July 2007
Reference
694 c492
House
House of Lords