Skip to main content

1-20 of 323 results for subject:Pedicabs

Session X
2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I understood that you could intervene at any stage, with the permission of the Member who is speaking.

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c86GC
House
House of Lords

If I recall, the date of elections in London—admittedly, they were parliamentary elections—was changed because of foot and mouth disease, which I do not think most Londoners would regard as a major event. I appreciate that it was regarded as a major event in the countryside but, for most Londoners,...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c83GC
House
House of Lords

We are told that these amendments amount to a veto or blocking power because of the strength of the term ““have regard to””. Next week, we will talk about the hierarchy of ““have regard to””, ““be in general conformity with”” and ““be in strict conformity with””. If those words amount...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c81GC
House
House of Lords

This is a very interesting proposal. I was a member of the GLC when the elections were deferred last time, and I am not sure that it did not create a lot of confusion. If it is a question of altering the date, perhaps it should be earlier rather than...

Member
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c82GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 39: 39: After Clause 16, insert the following new Clause— ““Ordinary elections Ordinary elections (1) Section 3 of the GLA 1999 Act (ordinary elections) is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (2) at the end insert ““, except that the poll due to be held on 3rd...

Member
Lord Sheikh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c81-2GC
House
House of Lords

This is a very interesting proposal. In fact, it is so interesting that I think it was raised—and, at one stage, had a degree of government support—when it was first proposed that London should bid for the Olympics. It was recognised that the potential disruptive effect of a mayoral election...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c82-3GC
House
House of Lords

As usual, I am very grateful to my noble friend for picking up the most important point of the argument. It shows that this is, once again, a variation on the debate about the balance of power between the Mayor and the Assembly and the threat that it poses to...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c79-81GC
House
House of Lords

I do not think that I can, but I am not sure that I am required to. As I said on the last group of amendments, our job here is to think through the ““what ifs?””, not to start from the point that the Assembly would be utterly difficult or...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c78GC
House
House of Lords

Internal democratic processes would enable coalitions to make a difference and allow the Assembly to get its way against the Mayor rather than external democratic processes.

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c76GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness was surprised at the proposition in the Bill that the draft component budgets could be amended. On two occasions she said that that was news to her. That would be an immeasurable power in discussions over scrutiny budgets. I would have thought that her group and the...

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c75GC
House
House of Lords

This has been a lively debate. I will not follow the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, through the detailed way in which she presented her arguments. It is probably better that I do what I was invited to do by the noble Lord, Lord Hanningfield, and address some simple political realities....

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c73-5GC
House
House of Lords

At Second Reading I referred to these clauses as being as complicated as a Fair Isle knitting pattern. I apologise to noble Lords that I have not made the process more like a stocking stitch. The noble Lord, Lord Campbell-Savours, asked why, if there was no budgetary floor in Essex...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c75GC
House
House of Lords

Yes.

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c72GC
House
House of Lords

A democratic body would ensure that enough money was available for the scrutiny function, but if I, as leader of Essex County Council, wanted to thwart that, I could. Here, we are suggesting that the Mayor might have the power to thwart the functioning of the Assembly, and we want...

Member
Lord Hanningfield (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c72GC
House
House of Lords

I listened carefully to what the Minister said. Is the over-riding consideration that the Government simply do not want civil servants to be required to attend the Assembly, irrespective of the merits of this case? If it is, then we have to go back to the essential principle behind it....

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c100-1GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 42: 42: Clause 21, page 19, line 20, at end insert— ““( ) In section 61 of the GLA Act 1999 (power to require attendance at Assembly meetings), after subsection (2)(a) insert— ““(aa) the Health Adviser and any Deputy Health Adviser,””.”” The noble Baroness said: I hope...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c98-9GC
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister help me? Do the Government not actually support taking the matter forward? If they do—they seem to from the tone of the Minister’s remarks—would it not be much more straightforward and save a lot of time, effort and money to clarify the legal issues in the Bill?

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c97GC
House
House of Lords

That is an interesting question. I have tried to be clear, although I may not have been clear enough. The Government welcome the fact that TfL is trying to take this forward, but it is a matter for TfL. We welcome the fact that TfL is discussing a voluntary scheme...

Member
Baroness Morgan of Drefelin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c97-8GC
House
House of Lords

Far be it for me to challenge the Clerks, but I am concerned that a Bill in which the Long Title includes the words, "““to make further provision with respect to the functional bodies””," such as Transport for London, rules out such an issue. It also makes provision for the...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c96GC
House
House of Lords

I, too, support the amendment. I declare a slight interest in that I live in Westminster. I have heard from councillors that there is also concern that pedicabs park on the footpath outside theatres and similar places. If there was a fire and people were trying to get out, they...

Member
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
2 May 2007
Reference
691 c95GC
House
House of Lords