Skip to main content

1-20 of 135 results for subject:Poaching

Session X
2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister of State, Ministry of Justice how many convictions there were in each year from 2002 to 2006 for illegal poaching of salmon with prohibited instruments.

Asked by
Greg Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 June 2007
Reference
144103; 461 c2128W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what his assessment is of (a) the quality of the data produced by the Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants system and (b) its ability to detect changes in poaching rates.

Asked by
Mark Hunter (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 June 2007
Reference
141251; 461 c834W
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Regulatory Reform Committee
Date
20 March 2007
Reference
HC 411 2006-07
House
House of Commons

I shall deal with the noble Baroness’s last question first. The figure that she gave is our current estimate. We have had to ask for advice from the relevant authorities on their reasonable expectation as a result of going through cases and histories to see what is likely. That is...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c819-20
House
House of Lords

If ever there were a hint that I should be brief! I can sometimes take a hint, and this is one of those occasions. The Minister argued that the Government have departed from the norm by providing for express delegation and that there is tighter control than usual. I am...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c820
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for that reply. When I said that it is within criminal law, I meant that it is within a Serious Crime Bill that comes from the Home Office. I appreciated that the particular focus of the actions in the Bill is the civil procedure. I think she...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c817-8
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 89: 89: Schedule 2, page 52, line 28, leave out paragraph 2 The noble Baroness said: I shall also speak to Amendments Nos. 90 to 92 as we reach the end of Part 1. The amendments make the applicant authorities take more effective control over decisions to...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c818-9
House
House of Lords

First, on the question raised by the noble Lord, Lord Burnett, I do not think that anything is not covered by the Bill at the moment; but, as I said to the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes, as things have evolved, we have created new bodies that should properly be included...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c815-7
House
House of Lords

Yes, these proceedings will be held in open court.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c787
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Lord makes up his mind, am I right that proceedings for ASBOs as civil orders are held in public and that there is no secrecy about them? Am I also right that a similar procedure will apply to this type of order?

Member
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c787
House
House of Lords

I had understood that this was a probing case. Was the noble Lord struck by the apparent paradox in the Minister’s assertion of a possible breach of Article 8 and incompatibility with the convention with the arguments that have been deployed in reverse in respect of other clauses in the...

Member
Lord Burnett (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c788
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 64: 64: Clause 7 , page 6, line 30, at beginning insert— ““(1)”” The noble Baroness said: I shall speak to Amendments Nos. 65, 66 and 130 as well. Clause 7 provides that the Secretary of State may, by order, expressly exclude the application of a serious...

Member
Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c788-9
House
House of Lords

I shall consider that when I read the Minister’s remarks. I am not about to leap to a hasty conclusion; we have done enough dividing for the day, and I do not think I would enjoy the same majority. If there is a public trial, then it is public. The...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c788
House
House of Lords

Dinner-break arrangements are being finalised as I speak.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c789
House
House of Lords

The amendments have our support. It is right that serious crime prevention orders should be made by statutory instrument subject to the affirmative resolution of Parliament. Amendment No. 66 also is to be supported. It would ensure that those who have a history of mental illness and mental incapacity could...

Member
Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c789
House
House of Lords

I am happy to have further discussion outside the Chamber so that we can explore the issues in the intricate way the noble Lord seeks. I am sure that in the end we can satisfy him about what we are trying to achieve in putting together information in an orderly...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c787
House
House of Lords

Yes, admonished me and indicated over and over again that house arrest is not involved. So in conjunction with the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, over dinner, I decided that another acronym would be more appropriate. I thoughtof CODPO—that is, a confinement to domestic premises order—or, possibly, a POTODPO, which is...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c791
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 68: 68: Clause 9 , page 7, line 5, leave out ““a significant”” and insert ““an”” The noble Lord said: I will speak also to Amendments Nos. 69, 70, 72, 77 and 78. The amendments all remove ““a significant”” or ““significantly”” as appropriate, and probe exactly what...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c794-5
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness has gone through the various clauses to which we object. It would take far too long for me to go through them individually. However, we should look at Clauses 33 and 34. Clause 33 states: "““Proceedings before the High Court … are civil proceedings. One consequence …...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c793-4
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, for the brevity with which he outlined his amendments. With the greatest regret, I must tell him that I find the new shortened form no more attractive than the last, but I am confident that the noble Lord will continue to...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2007
Reference
690 c791-3
House
House of Lords