Skip to main content

1-20 of 649 results for subject:Self-employed

Session X
2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The Minister will be aware, however, that much of the problem arises when someone's lifestyle is obviously at variance with their declared income. He said that we would use HMRC data, but one of the problems is that when there is evidence of a difference between lifestyle and declared income, the CSA often does not properly investigate it. Will the HMRC data be treated as sacrosanct or will CMEC have powers to investigate further when there is evidence that they do not equate with the lifestyle of the person involved?
Asked by
Mike Weir (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c15
House
House of Commons
What would the Minister say to the gentleman—I will call him Mr. X—who came to my surgery on Saturday, a self-employed individual who has supplied all his information to the CSA, which has lost his file on two separate occasions? He has asked for a statement of what he has paid and how the calculation has been made, only to be told that that information is not available to him or his solicitor. He is now being taken to court, on Friday, by a debt collection agency. I rang the MP hotline this morning, only to be told that I would have to put the case in writing to the CSA, which would have to contact the debt collection agency, which would then write back—a process taking four weeks. Does not the system cut MPs out of the loop? Should it not be a bit more responsive to the situation in which my constituent has found himself?
Asked by
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c15-6
House
House of Commons
I thank my hon. Friend for that further point. We have all seen similar cases in our constituency surgeries. That is why we are introducing additional powers in the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill, which is now going through Parliament: first, the power to use gross income information from HMRC, which will give us a more robust and reliable source of information about real income than what some self-employed non-resident parents tell us; secondly, the power to use fixed-term awards; and, thirdly—and importantly for those who are still inclined not to co-operate—powers to deduct money directly from accounts that self-employed people might have with various financial institutions.
Answered by
James Plaskitt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c15
House
House of Commons
The hon. Gentleman identifies a correct point. One of the problems was that the CSA was, in a sense, originally designed and set up to be an investigatory agency, but was never given the powers to be one. The difference with the new commission is that it will have the right to access HMRC data, which are far more reliable on real income levels than the evidence that self-employed non-resident parents submit to the agency. With the use of HMRC data and the other steps we are taking, especially the power to have direct access to finance accounts, we are confident that we can certainly make it far more difficult for self-employed non-resident parents to evade their responsibility to maintain their children.
Answered by
James Plaskitt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c15
House
House of Commons
My hon. Friend highlights an extremely complex case, of which there are still a fair number in the system. The length of time that it is taking to resolve the case that he outlined is, of course, not satisfactory. I should be more than happy to meet him urgently, to see whether I can make any intervention that might speed matters up.
Answered by
James Plaskitt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c15-6
House
House of Commons
As well as accurate assessments, enforcement of the assessments is vital. Every week, I see cases where it is obvious that the tax return information and the figures that are submitted to the CSA are quite unrelated. I have spoken to the CSA, which does not use Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs departments as well as it might. What can be done to ensure that people do not use self-employment deliberately to delay or obstruct the enforcement of their child maintenance liability?
Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c15
House
House of Commons
With the compliance rate among self-employed non-resident parents at 59 per cent., it is clearly important to take further measures, which we are doing in the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Bill. For example, the use of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs information and fixed-term maintenance awards will speed up the process and help to prevent self-employed non-resident parents from providing delayed or misleading information.
Answered by
James Plaskitt (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c14-5
House
House of Commons
What changes he plans to make to the system of calculating maintenance payments to reduce avoidance of payments by self-employed non-resident parents; and if he will make a statement.
Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2007
Reference
464 c14-5; 156112
House
House of Commons

SI 2007/2614. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Treasury. regulation 2(1) and (4)(b) Coming into force 1 October 2007; regulation 2(2) and (3) in so far as they relate to a particular beneficiary, coming into force on the first day of the first benefit week to commence...

Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
10 September 2007
Reference
SI 2007/2614
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

SI 2007/2613. (Negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from the Treasury. regulation 2(1) and (5) Coming into force 1 October 2007; regulation 2(2) and (3) in so far as they relate to a particular beneficiary, coming into force on the first day of the first benefit week to commence...

Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
10 September 2007
Reference
SI 2007/2613
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what estimate he has made of the average amount of time worked each week by self-employed people in the UK.

Asked by
Lord Grayling (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 2007
Reference
152618; 463 c1456W
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I shall certainly withdraw it if the noble Baroness challenges me, because I am sure that she is quite accurate. Let me say that average interest rates over that period were in double figures; that I will assert. If the noble Baroness presses me and I am wrong,...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c190
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing the Finance Bill and I congratulate my noble friend Lord Wakeham on yet another significant report on the Bill from his economic affairs sub-committee. At 309 pages, this year’s Finance Bill is long but relatively modest compared with those of recent years....

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c183-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, none of us expects the Minister to produce new tax proposals, but could he help us by saying why the Government are happy with non-domiciled taxpayers, perhaps billionaires, paying no stamp duty on very expensive properties in London while those paying tax at 40 per cent or less...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c188
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall come on to the noble Lord’s speech in a moment, but he will recognise that a third represents an extensive increase in taxation directed towards his objectives. He will know how difficult it is to persuade the electorate of the enormous virtues to be seen in...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c188
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this debate, particularly the noble Lord, Lord Wakeham, for introducing his important Select Committee report and for highlighting the points that the committee identified. I emphasise the fact that about 60 per cent of the Budget represents...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c186-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot remember the exact figures, but I think that I would like the noble Lord to withdraw the statement that we never had interest rates in single figures, because it is simply not true.

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c190
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is to presume that, if such individuals then made up their minds that living in London was no longer an option that they wanted to exercise, there would be a straight gain for the Exchequer. All I would say is that I do not think that it...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c189-90
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that simply will not do as an argument. If Russian billionaires are paying almost no stamp duty on houses in London costing £20 million, making them pay will not reduce the yield. What it might do is have an impact on the house price boom in central London,...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c189
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord should not presume that these are straightforward and easy issues. The issue with regard to non-domiciles is obvious: we have to balance the tax loss of not taxing them as fully domestic residents against the obvious mobility of that community and the possibility that their...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2007
Reference
694 c188-9
House
House of Lords