Skip to main content

1-20 of 285 results for subject:Software

Session X
2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the annual cost was of the VAT exemption on software for blind and partially sighted people in the latest period for which figures are available.

Asked by
David Chaytor (Labour)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
159360; 465 c911W
House
House of Commons

(6) what advice has been issued by the Office of Government Commerce to departments on the use of Open Source information technology.

Asked by
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
154778; 465 c485-6W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster (1) what estimate he has made of the (a) percentage of software by value procured using Open Source and (b) percentage of software projects procured using Open Source in each of the last five years for which information is available;

Asked by
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
154773; 465 c485-6W
House
House of Commons

(3) what assessment his Department has made of the potential of Open Source software to produce efficiency savings;

Asked by
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
154775; 465 c485-6W
House
House of Commons

(2) what plans he has to promote the use of Open Source IT by Government bodies; and what targets exist for the use of Open Source;

Asked by
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
154774; 465 c485-6W
House
House of Commons

(4) what steps have been taken following his Department's publication of Open Source Software Use Within UK Government in 2004; and if he will make a statement;

Asked by
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
154776; 465 c485-6W
House
House of Commons

(5) which of the seven next steps listed on page six of his Department's publication Open Source Software Use Within UK Government published in 2004, have been implemented; and if he will make a statement;

Asked by
Julia Goldsworthy (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 October 2007
Reference
154777; 465 c485-6W
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Government IT and software procurement.

Lead member
John Pugh
Answering member
Angela Eagle
Department
Treasury
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c46-52WH
House
House of Commons

IT procurement within Government is thought to be an unmitigated disaster, but that is not true. There is good and bad procurement in Government, just as there is in the private sector, and mistakes made in the private sector are sometimes similar to those made in the public sector. Nevertheless,...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c46-7WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an interesting case, which I am following in detail. Would it not help in the quest for openness if the British Standards Institution were to follow the lead in other parts of the world and make open source XML one of the standards to be applied...

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c47WH
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is far more expert in this field than I am. He will be aware of the debate on XML and of what standards should be used for office applications and the like.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c47WH
House
House of Commons

I understand the nature of ongoing contractual relationships. All that I can say is that because we do not want lock-in or citizens to be left with sub-optimal solutions, it is up to the people contracting to ensure that that does not happen. I think that we are far more...

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c52WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for what the Minister is saying; it is a useful background and encouraging to hear in some respects. The point that I was making, which she has not dealt with, was not about whether some of the tenders are open and above board and give everybody a...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c52WH
House
House of Commons

That is the type of canard that comes up every time—that we must use a particular supplier because everybody uses it. If the Government are obliging people to use a supplier, that becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy, as I am sure the Minister will acknowledge.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c49WH
House
House of Commons

I caution the hon. Gentleman to allow me to develop the theme of my speech before he leaps up hyperventilating and continues talking about the great Microsoft dominance. The Government are neutral about the types of software systems that they wish to be used. I accept that the Government spend...

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c49-52WH
House
House of Commons

I exonerate the Government on that point and turn my accusation against the members of that Committee. I made my representations and will continue to do so. This issue is as clear a case of illegal state aid as, for example, the BBC iPlayer—a case that will go to the...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c48-9WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Southport (Dr. Pugh) on securing the debate and thank him for raising the issue. In general, Government IT and software procurement are important matters. He is right to say that, through their decisions on procurement, the Government can have some influence on the way...

Member
Angela Eagle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c49WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. The hon. Gentleman makes a fair point, and the more we converge around open standards, the fewer arguments—arguments of the sort that I am involved in now—there will be. In fact, Microsoft is not the only villain of the piece. The BBC was forced to withdraw its net...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c48WH
House
House of Commons

Just to put the record straight, the decision to take Apple Macs out of the service supported by PICT was a decision of Members; indeed, the old Information Committee, on which I served for nine years, took that decision.

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c48WH
House
House of Commons

Open source.

Member
Andrew Miller (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 October 2007
Reference
464 c47WH
House
House of Commons