Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,864 results for subject:"School leaving"

Session X
2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Education and Skills Bill. Ways and Means resolution authorising the charging of fees in respect of inspections by Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills of independent educational institutions. Agreed to on question. Programme motion (No 3) on consideration of Lords amendments and subsequent stages. Agreed to...

Department
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Type
Debates on bills
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c41-97
House
House of Commons

What an interesting debate—it reminded me of the Second Reading debate of all those months ago. I am not going to get distracted by the new Tory party policy on who the greatest living Briton is, but I certainly join the hon. Member for South Holland and The Deepings (Mr....

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c58-9
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. Gentleman as concerned as I am about the reasonable excuses that youngsters who decide not to participate can put forward? Does he think that that will be a bureaucratic nightmare? Can he think of any reasonable excuses? Does he know how far they will go, or how...

Member
Bob Spink (UK Independence Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c57
House
House of Commons

The nub of it was whether the learning and support agreement could be an alternative to education and training for a period of time or whether it had to take place at the same time as the education and training requirement is provided.

Member
David Laws (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c61
House
House of Commons

We will return to those points in the next set of amendments, so I will deal with them then, rather than now. I am grateful to the hon. Member for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton (Mr. Gibb) for pointing out Lord Goodlad's letter and the importance of audi alteram partem, meaning...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c48-9
House
House of Commons

I apologise for interrupting the Minister again, but he has helpfully said that SEN might provide the material for a reasonable excuse. My specific point was about the role of special educational needs, and particularly statements, in the learning agreements. The attendance process is to be informed by agreements so,...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c60
House
House of Commons

The agreement, as it is an agreement, would be personalised. It would be individual to that learner and be in accordance with their needs. If their needs were set out in a statement of special educational needs, the learning and support agreement would clearly have to reflect that. I hope...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c60-1
House
House of Commons

It is extremely helpful to have those details supplied on the record. I asked the question so that the Minister could do just that. I wonder whether it would have been appropriate—it might still be appropriate—to put those matters on the face of the Bill, or at least to summarise...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c60
House
House of Commons

As an experienced Member of the House, the hon. Gentleman will know that notions of reasonableness are very common in legislation. It is important, I think, to leave flexibility for courts, attendance panels and so on to interpret reasonableness in the normal way. As soon as I start to specify...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c60
House
House of Commons

I welcome this second group of amendments that were made in the other place and I believe that we therefore have a stronger, fuller and better Bill. This group makes further refinements to the support and enforcement system for young people, which is probably the most controversial and debated aspect...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c49-50
House
House of Commons

The Minister says that if the young person goes back into education, all enforcement action will cease. Does that mean that they could continually engage with the enforcement process and go back enough to return to ground zero again? How will he ensure that they do not take the mick...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c50
House
House of Commons

Naturally, we are concerned about mick-takers, so the process would not go all the way back to the beginning. In the end, the matter would come down to the judgment of the attendance panel, at the points at which I have described it working. If someone came back before the...

Member
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c50-1
House
House of Commons

Thank you very much for that, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I am aware of your role as protector of Back-Bench Members, and we should be able to challenge Ministers, and they should not intervene from a sedentary position. If the Under-Secretary wants to correct the figures, he is free to do...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c57
House
House of Commons

We are pleased to return to our measured consideration of these important matters, which absorbed a good deal of the debate in Committee and the House of Lords. We are grateful to the other House for its close consideration, which gives us a chance to debate these matters again. Without...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c51-3
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Member for Castle Point (Bob Spink) that the Bill's provisions are one more attack on liberty by this new Labour Government. We are now in the 12th year of this Labour Government, and one would hope and expect a Labour Government to put resources and...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c56-7
House
House of Commons

Name them.

Member
Lord Mann (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c74
House
House of Commons

I could give the hon. Gentleman a list if he wishes. I recommend that he go to Mossbourne academy in Hackney, for example, where 50 per cent. of the children qualify for free school meals and 40 per cent. speak English as a second language, and where he will see...

Member
Nick Gibb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c74
House
House of Commons

I do not remember that. It was many months ago and I have forgotten. The amendment typifies the Labour Government's obsession with admissions. As my hon. Friend the Member for Surrey Heath (Michael Gove) said on Report:"““Unfortunately, there is still an old Labour, socialist approach to the question of admissions…...

Member
Nick Gibb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c73-4
House
House of Commons

I served on the Committee.

Member
Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c73
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Under-Secretary to her new position and to the Dispatch Box to discuss the final stages of the Bill. She missed many months of interesting debate—

Member
Nick Gibb (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 November 2008
Reference
483 c73
House
House of Commons