Skip to main content

1-20 of 158 results for subject:Dissolution

Session X
2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The issue of fixed-term Parliaments has been debated in this House on a number of occasions. Most recently, the hon. Member for Cambridge (David Howarth) introduced a private Member's Bill that would have provided for general elections every four years.
Answered by
Lord Wills (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c714
House
House of Commons
Many excellent arguments are commonly used in favour of fixed-term Parliaments, but does the Minister agree that another advantage of such a system is that it would make it much easier to regulate party political spending over the entire electoral cycle? Surely that is particularly desirable, as there is clearly a need for much tighter control of party funding and spending.
Asked by
Jo Swinson (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c714
House
House of Commons
When I introduced a Bill on the subject many years ago, I was told that I had to get royal permission, which surely reminds us that, at some point, we need to get serious hold of prerogative powers. Does not the hon. Member for East Dunbartonshire (Jo Swinson) have a good essential point, which is that if we really want to control or get hold of the vexed issue of party funding, we have to get some more reliable control over the election spending period? Fixed-term Parliaments would enable us to do that.
Asked by
Tony Wright (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c714-5
House
House of Commons
May I say to Ministers that the present system gives far too much influence and control to the Prime Minister of the day? Those of us who want much greater parliamentary democracy and curbs on the Executive would like fixed-term Parliaments.
Asked by
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c715
House
House of Commons
I agree with part of what the right hon. and learned Gentleman said, and the Prime Minister has already said that he wants the dissolution of Parliament to be subject to a vote in this House for precisely the reasons that the right hon. and learned Gentleman gave. There is a misunderstanding that fixed-term Parliaments would somehow remove the Executive's ability to hold an election at a time of their choosing. That is not necessarily the case. For example, the former West Germany had fixed-term Parliaments, but in 1972 and 1983 the Government of the day were able to engineer a general election by engineering a vote of no confidence in the Government, so what the right hon. and learned Gentleman is looking for would not necessarily transpire.
Answered by
Lord Wills (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c715
House
House of Commons
On the hon. Lady's final point, she will be aware that we are bringing a Bill before the House that will address all those issues, and I look forward to her contribution to debates on it as we tackle what I agree is a very important issue. On the other issue that she raised, there are arguments on both sides. They have been exhaustively rehearsed, and no doubt we will continue debating them for the foreseeable future.
Answered by
Lord Wills (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c714
House
House of Commons
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his contribution. He will be aware, of course, that we are coming to terms with how we get a grip on the prerogative power; that is the basis of the ““Governance of Britain”” programme. We are introducing a Constitutional Renewal Bill, as he is well aware. We have built on the excellent work done by his Committee—the Public Administration Committee—to try to codify the royal prerogative. We will take that work further forward. Of course he is right that we have to get a grip on party spending at election time; that is precisely why we are introducing the Bill. Again, I look forward to his contribution to debate on the Bill. I point out to him, and to the hon. Member for East Dunbartonshire (Jo Swinson), who first asked the question, that there are arguments against fixed-term Parliaments. As they will both be well aware, there is an element of inflexibility in such a system that sometimes would not serve this country well.
Answered by
Lord Wills (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c714-5
House
House of Commons
What recent representations he has received on the proposal for fixed-term Parliaments.
Asked by
Jo Swinson (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
28 October 2008
Reference
481 c714; 230372
House
House of Commons
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
2 July 2008
House
House of Commons

First, that is not the position in Sweden. Secondly, does the Minister not think that it is a good idea to remove our monarch from any possibility of involvement in politics?

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1717
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady strikes a potent chord with me, and I have every sympathy with her. As the hon. Member for Cambridge mentioned earlier, the date of the 2001 election was changed because of the foot and mouth crisis. I was expecting a baby at that point, and had thought...

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1712-3
House
House of Commons

Does that mean that the Government would still keep the rule whereby a vote of no confidence in a Prime Minister leads to a general election, which could be important in the next few months?

Member
Baroness Laing of Elderslie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1718
House
House of Commons

I have not read the details of those proceedings, but we are in the process of having that debate—the Joint Committee has been set up, and we are discussing the measure with people. The rhetoric begins the process, and the reality is what will come out of the findings of...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1716-7
House
House of Commons

I do not know whether the Minister has had the benefit of reading the proceedings of the Joint Committee on the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill, but if she has, she will know that almost all the evidence that we have received complains of a big gap between the Government's rhetoric...

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1716
House
House of Commons

Our current system is better than those available elsewhere, which is why we should continue with it. The monarch decides on the appointment of the Government through constitutional convention, so it is important to note that the introduction of fixed-term Parliaments in the United Kingdom would not necessarily eliminate the...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1718
House
House of Commons

The simple answer to the Minister's question is that the principle of parliamentary supremacy allows us to pass any Bill that we like, and it would take precedence over anything that we had passed previously.

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1715
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman referred to that in his opening remarks. Yes, Parliament can pass any Bill that it likes. Some Bills take longer than others to pass, and others can be passed in a day. If a Government had a reasonable majority they could present a very short Bill—it would...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1715
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for giving way again, but trying to force a Bill through the House in a day is very difficult without the co-operation of the other parties. Resources and procedural devices could be used that are not used when the other parties are co-operating. Furthermore, without the...

Member
David Howarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1715
House
House of Commons

I would not say that that is necessarily impossible in the House of Lords; otherwise a Government might find themselves never reaching the end of their legislative programme. However, it is true that Labour Governments certainly have far more difficulties in the House of Lords than do Conservatives ones. Nevertheless,...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1715-6
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Cambridge (David Howarth) on his success in the private Members' ballot. It is always a great achievement and Back Benchers value it greatly. I am grateful to him for initiating this debate on fixed-term Parliaments. Parliamentarians love to discuss the topic; we always feel...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2008
Reference
475 c1714-5
House
House of Commons