Skip to main content

1-20 of 215 results for subject:Leasehold

Session X
2007-08

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

May we have a debate on the effect of the credit crunch and the lowering of house prices on leaseholders who bought their flats on large council estates? As I know my right hon. and learned Friend is aware, many of them are on low incomes and face huge bills...

Member
Emily Thornberry (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
13 November 2008
Reference
482 c954-5
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for raising that issue. Along with our hon. Friend the Member for Regent's Park and Kensington, North (Ms Buck), she has been a champion for the protection of leaseholders. Many people bought former council properties, but then, with the big investment in council estates following...

Member
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 November 2008
Reference
482 c954-5
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what consideration he has given to extending leasehold enfranchisement to NHS hospitals occupying sites on long leases; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
John Stanley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 July 2008
Reference
218468; 479 c677W;479 c675W
House
House of Commons

asked Her Majesty's Government:What percentage of the total number of homes in private ownership is leasehold.

Asked by
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2008
Reference
4023; 702 c208WA
House
House of Lords

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they plan to review the law concerning forfeiture provisions in residential leases.

Asked by
Baroness Scott of Needham Market (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 June 2008
Reference
4024; 702 c208-9WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what steps the Government are planning to make it easier for buyers and sellers of leasehold homes and their agents to obtain information about service charges and other matters relating to the management of the property;

Asked by
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 June 2008
Reference
476 c1177-8W; 207392
House
House of Commons

(2) what assessment she has made of the merits of requiring management information regarding leasehold homes to be held by the Land Registry in the same way as information held about commonhold homes.

Asked by
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 June 2008
Reference
476 c1177-8W; 207393
House
House of Commons

Finance Bill. Committee stage fifteenth sitting (morning). Schedule 27, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 82 to 88 agreed to. Schedule 28 agreed to. Clause 89 agreed to. Schedule 29 agreed to. Clause 91, as amended, agreed to. Schedule 30 agreed to. Clauses 92 to 94 agreed to, with clauses 92...

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
5 June 2008
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

I am today laying amendments to the home information pack regulations to extend the temporary first day marketing provision, and to extend the temporary provision requiring HIPs to include the ““lease”” only and to ““authorise”” other leasehold documents, from 1 June to 31 December 2008. The temporary first day marketing...

Member
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
8 May 2008
Reference
475 c37-9WS
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Minister for Housing and Planning (Caroline Flint) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. I am today laying amendments to the Home Information Pack Regulations to extend the temporary first-day marketing provision, and to extend the temporary provision requiring HIPs to include the ““lease”” only...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written statements
Date
8 May 2008
Reference
701 c35-8WS
House
House of Lords

I rise to support my hon. Friend the Member for Putney (Justine Greening). Her amendment makes a lot of sense, and I hope that the Minister will simply concede that. I am sure that the Government intend the tax exemption to be available only on the first sale-and-purchase transaction. The...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c194-5
House
House of Commons

Current costs—far higher than any planned for by the Treasury—are such that the market is already sending dramatic signals to the wider economy. The amendment would be an important way for the Government to send the signal that they understood the burdens faced by rural economies and the important role...

Member
Robert Smith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c251
House
House of Commons

I am probably the first hon. Member to address the amendment whose constituency does not contain any remote rural parts.

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c251
House
House of Commons

I shall take the intervention of the hon. Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Mr. MacNeil) before moving on.

Member
Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c249
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right, and two separate costs are involved here. The first is the cost to the businesses, which are often marginal: for instance, although they have had a very good season this year, one of them may still not have made any money. However, the second cost...

Member
Stewart Hosie (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c246
House
House of Commons

I will be guided by you, Sir Alan. We wait with keen interest to ascertain whether the Conservative party has anything meaningful to say about reducing, for example, private car journeys. At the moment, it seems big on criticism—

Member
Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c190
House
House of Commons

That is a fair comment. It has many of the characteristics of one of the devolved Assemblies, but not all of them. It would also be fair to ask whether elected executive mayors, taking on a full-time role in managing a big city, could reasonably argue that they should be...

Member
Lord Hammond of Runnymede (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c175-6
House
House of Commons

The original explanatory memorandum to the statutory instrument excluded flats and maisonettes. So will the Exchequer Secretary confirm that, when she talks about flats, she means that flats and maisonettes are now included?

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c201
House
House of Commons

I declare an interest as a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants. I do not understand why the institute and other organisations were put to the trouble and cost of becoming involved in a consultation that lasted for only eight weeks when I understand that the Government recommend minimum...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c223
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that we need to look at the changes against the new background that petrol at the pump has gone up to at least £1.10 a litre, of which a massive 70p is now tax and duty—far more than the Government planned at the time of...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2008
Reference
475 c257
House
House of Commons