Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,371 results for subject:Peers

Session X
2008-09

Type

-
Early day motions (4)
+ Legislation (6) + Bills (4) + Public bills (4)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
+ Delegated legislation (2)
-
Statutory instruments (2)
+ Members' contributions (1,238)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (38)
-
Oral questions (40)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,160)
+ Parliamentary committees (14) + Committee proceedings (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (8)
+ Parliamentary papers (12)
-
House of Commons papers (1)
-
House of Lords journals (1)
-
House of Lords papers (10)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (71) + Debates (21)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (1)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (2)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Debates on select committee reports (4)
+ Legislative debates (8)
-
Debates on bills (6)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Tributes (1)
+ Formal proceedings (30)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (29)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
-
Private notice questions (2)
+ Statements (17) + Oral statements (9)
-
Ministerial statements (5)
-
Personal statements (4)
-
Written statements (8)
+ Parliamentary questions (85)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral questions (40)
-
Private notice questions (2)
-
Written questions (41)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Wilson Doctrine prohibits surveillance of Members of either House of Parliament which is authorised by (a) a general certificate rather than a warrant, (b) the police using powers in Part III of the Police Act 1997, (c) the automatic number plate recognition database,...

Asked by
Lord Bates (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 November 2009
Reference
6123; 714 c143WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should like to make a personal statement. Before the defence debate last Friday, I am afraid that I forgot to declare an interest. I am the non-executive chairman of a private security company.

Member
Lord Inge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 November 2009
Reference
714 c671
House
House of Lords

Lords personal statement on the failure to declare an interest as the non-executive chairman of a private security company during a defence debate.

Lead member
Lord Inge
Type
Personal statements
Date
10 November 2009
Reference
714 c671
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I regret that I have to inform the House of the death last night of Lord Steinberg. On behalf of the House, I extend our condolences to his family and friends.

Member
Baroness Hayman (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
714 c113
House
House of Lords

Lords announcement of the death of Lord Steinberg on 2 November 2009.

Lead member
Baroness Hayman
Department
Lord Speaker
Type
Non-legislative formal proceedings
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
714 c113
House
House of Lords

That was 12 years ago. At the time, what was the proper way for people to raise that issue and say that the situation was either ineffective or improper, or both?

Member
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c818
House
House of Commons

The assurance that I can give hon. Members is that the same right of access to complaints procedures will be available to GCHQ staff as to staff of the other agencies. I understand that GCHQ staff were consulted about that and raised no objections.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c774
House
House of Commons

When we considered the devolution Bills at the start of the Government's time in office—

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c762
House
House of Commons

I rise briefly to support my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve), the hon. Member for Somerton and Frome (Mr. Heath) and my right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham (Mr. Hogg). As the years have gone by, I have wondered...

Member
Humfrey Malins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c761-2
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. and learned Friend also agree that the merit of not having knives is that, as the days progress, it might become apparent that there is insufficient time to consider the business within the Government's timetable? We could therefore make powerful representations that we needed extra days...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c761
House
House of Commons

Irrespective of whether or not the Bill is modest in itself, does the hon. Gentleman agree that it is a vehicle to which this House and its Members can add very substantially, if that is what this House wants?

Member
Viscount Hailsham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c757
House
House of Commons

The right hon. and learned Gentleman will also be aware that there is a very high expectation of a statement tomorrow—the second day in Committee—so we will lose yet more time. That is again something that could not have been factored in when the programme motion was first considered.

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c761
House
House of Commons

Awful!

Member
Nicholas Winterton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c762
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree, and the hon. Gentleman is another veteran of these debates. My point is that the House as a whole has important amendments to debate, in connection with what is a constitutional Bill. In the past, the Government have accepted the principle that we should have the time...

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c763
House
House of Commons

With permission, Madam Deputy Speaker, may I say that I understand the concerns of the House? I could be forgiven for thinking that there was general approbation for devoting four days to this Bill, as on 20 October—just two weeks ago—the House agreed that proposal without Division. Not even the...

Member
Jack Straw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c763-4
House
House of Commons

Well, there were arguments about the quality of the Bills, but the Government accepted the principle that they would agree programme motions with the Opposition, and allow the Opposition the time that they asked for to debate the Bills. My right hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and...

Member
Oliver Heald (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c762-3
House
House of Commons

The four days may be sufficient—I do not think that they will be, but they may—but the point is that they can be extended by means of a further programme motion in the future. What cannot be extended are the knives that the Secretary of State is trying to insert...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c763
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c764
House
House of Commons

Although the hon. Gentleman and I may differ on whether the reforms that he seeks to the role of the Attorney-General are right, it is perfectly clear that they should be debated during our consideration of this Bill—there is no reason why they should not be. It is clearly in...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c758
House
House of Commons

Of course it should. Let me conclude by saying that if one wanted the clearest possible advertisement for the virtues of a proper business committee, where these matters are discussed in advance between the parties, including Back-Bench Members on both sides of the House, and where we can identify those...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 November 2009
Reference
498 c758
House
House of Commons