Skip to main content

1-20 of 373 results for subject:Iran

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Foreign Affairs Committee
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
HC 463 2009-10
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will ask the Government of Iran for clemency in the case of Miss Zaynab Jalalian, sentenced to death in Kermanshah for being "an enemy of God".

Asked by
Lord Hylton (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
3045; 718 c370WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to both the noble Lord, Lord Dykes, and to the Minister for addressing this issue and responding to my Motion in a very detailed way. I accept what the Minister says in his assurance that the Commission’s powers—which are new powers, although of a...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1299-300
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we on these Benches express gratitude to the Merits Committee for bringing this to the attention of this House and the other place, and also to the noble Lord, Lord Howell of Guildford, for raising it in the debate today. It is an important point. I, too, thank...

Member
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1296-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Howell, for his comments. I think we all share his concern that EU legislation should be subjected to proper scrutiny and that this House and the other place should have the opportunity properly to scrutinise both EU measures and the domestic legislation...

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1297-9
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for giving way. I have two corrections. One is on his part: it is Dykes, not Sykes. The other is on mine: I meant to say 43 years of occupation.

Member
Lord Dykes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1299
House
House of Lords

To move to resolve that this House regrets that Her Majesty’s Government have laid before Parliament the Export Control (Iran) (Amendment) Order 2010 (SI 2010/144) without explaining to Parliament how it would be implemented; and calls on the Government to explain why they consider the European Commission to be the...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1294
House
House of Lords

I thought that I did say that; please accept my apologies. We need to join with our European partners on this. The threat can be more effectively tackled at a European Union, rather than at a national level, by ensuring that there are uniform measures binding on all member states....

Member
Lord Davies of Abersoch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1299
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is appropriate that this debate, which I hope will be very short, should come straight after the important resolutions that have just been moved by the Leader of the House—which may or may not be considered tough enough and radical enough—that govern European Union scrutiny reserve and...

Member
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1295-6
House
House of Lords

Export Control (Iran) (Amendment) Order 2010. Lords debate on a motion to resolve that this House regrets that Her Majesty's Government have laid before Parliament the Export Control (Iran) (Amendment) Order 2010 (SI 2010/144) without explaining to Parliament how it would be implemented; and calls on the Government to explain...

Lead member
Lord Howell of Guildford
Answering member
Lord Davies of Abersoch
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c1294-300
House
House of Lords

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (Chris Bryant) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. The General Affairs Council (GAC) and Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) were held on 22 March in Brussels. My right honourable friend the Foreign Secretary (David Miliband) represented the...

Member
Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead (Labour)
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written statements
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
718 c195-8WS
House
House of Lords

The General Affairs Council and Foreign Affairs Council were held on 22 March in Brussels. My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary represented the UK. The agenda items covered were as follows: Foreign Affairs Council The provisional report of the meeting can be found at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/EN/foraff/113482.pdf Iran The agreed 'A'...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Department
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written statements
Date
30 March 2010
Reference
508 c100-3WS
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the state of UK relations with Iran; what plans he has for the future of UK-Iran relations; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Robert N Wareing (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c648W; 324642
House
House of Commons
We have had an ongoing campaign to ensure that people register for service votes, and the figure is now at 67 per cent. We have also put in arrangements to ensure that, where possible, postal voters' ballots are returned as speedily as possible. But overall, and for the longer term, I have had discussions with the Electoral Commission about possibly trialling e-voting.
Answered by
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c505
House
House of Commons
With Iran undertaking a major submarine-building programme, which military experts say could cause havoc in the Gulf, and Russia continuing its incursions into United Kingdom waters, why have the Government decided this week to scrap the Nimrod long-range maritime patrol aircraft? Who will provide the long-range search and rescue capability so lost from this week and who will protect our ships—at home and in the Gulf—now rendered vulnerable by Labour's cavalier approach to the defence of these islands?
Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c498
House
House of Commons
There is a strong case for the missile shield, which is why the Government have supported the technology; the threat that the Secretary-General outlined, and to which my right hon. Friend refers, is one of the reasons for that.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c498
House
House of Commons
A substantive offer of engagement has been made by the international community, which has been led, in particular, by the President of the United States. I regret that Iran has failed yet to embrace that offer of engagement. Iran needs to be in doubt that this is a matter of serious and real concern for the international community and that if there is not movement and engagement on the part of Iran, there will be—we will argue for and achieve this—much tougher sanctions.
Answered by
Bill Rammell (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c498
House
House of Commons
Do the Government agree with the statement made at the weekend by the NATO Secretary-General, Mr. Anders Fogh Rasmussen, that Europe now needs to develop a missile shield system to protect against a future Iranian missile—one with or without nuclear warheads?
Asked by
Denis MacShane (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c498
House
House of Commons
I thank the Minister for that answer. Does he believe that the Iranian Government are serious in their undertaking in respect of uranium enrichment abroad or does he believe that they are just playing for time?
Asked by
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c498
House
House of Commons
As we approach the general election, what provisions is the Ministry of Defence making to allow every single serviceman to have a vote that will be cast and counted?
Asked by
Brian H Donohoe (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c505
House
House of Commons