Skip to main content

1-20 of 257 results for subject:Protest

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

There was a draft Bill so the Government already knew what was in the Bill. Why did it take a year?

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1054
House
House of Lords

I have a couple of minutes to reply on my amendment. The whole House should be indebted to the Minister for the patient way in which he sat through the whole of this afternoon and evening and responded generously to all the points that have been made. I shall first...

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1054-6
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord, Lord Bach, not agree that, in the light of what has been said—not least by the noble Lord, Lord Rooker—there is a strong case to be made for having more than two options on the referendum paper? Having just two options would seem to close us...

Member
Bishop of Durham (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1050
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am well able to spot mental fatigue when I see it and so I shall be extremely short and associate myself with the remarks of the noble Lords, Lord Norton of Louth and Lord Pannick. I was a member of the Joint Committee on the Constitutional Renewal...

Member
Lord Hart of Chilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1035-6
House
House of Lords

I was going to come to that point but, since the noble Lord overstayed his welcome by so many minutes on that occasion, I do not intend to do so simply to respond to his intervention. Those who have been defending the indefensible today are going to fall heavily into...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1043-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is my pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Boothroyd. We first shared a platform in 1951, when I was chairman and she came along bringing a delegated representation. Ever since, our paths have crossed and it is a joy and a pleasure to see her here...

Member
Lord Graham of Edmonton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c1009-11
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have said that the procedure is the same as for all Bills. In other words, all Members, if they are so minded, have the right to put down amendments to Bills. The timetable is speeded up considerably. I cannot assist the House much more on this subject....

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c965
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the noble Lord remind me, and probably others, whether it is possible in wash-up to insert new material or change material in a Bill, or is it merely possible to remove those bits which are not agreeable to all parties?

Member
Lord Elton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c965
House
House of Lords

I would argue that we have kept up the momentum. It is essential that this House is able to deal with disciplinary issues effectively. Last year, the Privileges Committee concluded that this House did not have the powers it needed to expel Peers, or to withhold a writ of summons...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c962-4
House
House of Lords

I do not have the answer. I suspect that I know what the answer to the noble Lord’s question is and I will certainly answer it when I come to wind up the debate later today. Part 5 contains a package of measures which relate to your Lordships’ House. The...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c961-2
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister confirm that the trustees of the parliamentary pension fund must continue to have independence and cannot be responsive to any diktats from IPSA?

Member
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c961
House
House of Lords

I think that the answer is none, but some other Bills that have gone through wash-up are extremely important and have had a great influence on our national life, not least Bills on education, criminal justice and other matters. I dare say we will discuss this later this afternoon and...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, how many constitutional Bills have gone through the House in wash-up in the past 10 years?

Member
Baroness Boothroyd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot comment on whether wash-up will begin soon or not. It is an entirely theoretical consideration at this stage. I can say to my noble friend, and I choose my words carefully, that as the House will know, the wash-up is a regular feature at the end...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c964
House
House of Lords

I am most grateful to the Minister for giving way, as he is clearly reaching his conclusion. Could he say a word about the circumstances in which we are meeting? We have the wash-up coming up very shortly. Could he remind the House how this works? He has referred to...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c964
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister has introduced this Bill with a straight face and has answered all the questions that have been put to him with a straight face. On behalf of this side of the House and possibly the whole House, I congratulate him on that rather difficult task. The...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c965-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I thank my noble friend for responding to my earlier question about the precedents for wash-up and the way in which that might work out in the next couple of weeks. I still think that he could say a bit more about the transparencies of its modalities—in...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c988-90
House
House of Lords

As an amendment to the Motion that the Bill be now read a second time, at end to insert "but this House regrets the omission from Part 5 of the Bill of a statutory Appointments Commission".

Member
Lord Steel of Aikwood (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c983
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I endorse immediately the closing sentence of the noble Lord, Lord Howarth. The question of wash-up or not has come up a number of times. It is inconceivable that legislation in this state should be dealt with by wash-up. It is ironic to reflect that the Lord Chancellor,...

Member
Lord Howe of Aberavon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c979-83
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are many aspects of the Bill on which I am tempted to comment but, like the noble Lord, Lord Steel, I shall confine my comments to the provisions relating to the future of your Lordships’ House. In that context, I declare an interest as chairman of the...

Member
Lord Jay of Ewelme (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
718 c987-8
House
House of Lords