Skip to main content

1-20 of 438 results for subject:Technology

Session X
2009-10

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee
Date
24 March 2010
Reference
HC 481 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee (HL)
Date
23 March 2010
Reference
HL 104 2009-10
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Energy and Climate Change Committee
Date
17 March 2010
Reference
HC 193 2009-10
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee
Date
10 March 2010
Reference
HC 221 2009-10
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills when he expects the first funding to be disbursed from the UK innovation investment fund.

Asked by
Julie Kirkbride (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 March 2010
Reference
506 c1437W; 320208
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the second leg of that point was that if you are not going to refund the fee paid by an individual before a rule change then there should not be this element of retrospection. You should consider the application as made under the old rule, not treat it...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1651-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their input to the debate. With two speakers and just under 50 detailed questions, there is no doubt that anything to do with immigration and its rules is rather complicated. Maybe they are overcomplex, but in my short period in the Home Office...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1649-51
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start with the order which facilitates entry, as the noble Lord explained, into the UK by non-visa nationals who are lawfully entitled to enter by extending the automated gate system already in operation at certain UK airports for granting leave to enter. People coming in under this...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1645-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the fees apply whether it is to a grandfather, some cousin who cannot support himself, a grandson who cannot support himself or to a grand-daughter. We charge it across the board, so I do not believe that they are discriminatory. If the noble Lord is asking whether there...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1653
House
House of Lords

How can the Minister know that when the impact assessment states plainly that gender equality was not looked at and no results were annexed to it which enable one to judge the relative numbers of dependants and heads of households who were applying to come here and whether there was...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1653
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can see logic in what the noble Lord said. I will take that away and think about it. I will get back to him on that point. On timescales for ACS Plus, it is due to be installed at Heathrow Airport later this year. I will give...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1652
House
House of Lords

Moved by That the draft order laid before the House on 20 January be approved. Relevant Document: 7th Report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1641
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this Government are committed both to strengthening the United Kingdom border and to facilitating the entry of legitimate passengers into the country. To help us to achieve this, the UK Border Agency has taken advantage of new technologies that secure and manage the UK border. One such technology...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1641-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing and explaining these orders, which we support. I have a few probing questions. On the first immigration order, I understand that currently there are two types of automated gate at UK borders. The first type, e-passport gates, are designed for use by...

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1643-5
House
House of Lords

Draft Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) Order 2010. Lords debate on a motion to approve. Agreed to on question. Debated with draft Immigration and Nationality (Fees) Regulations 2010.

Lead member
Lord West of Spithead
Answering member
Baroness Neville-Jones
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
4 March 2010
Reference
717 c1641-53
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister kindly accepted my previous amendment, which limited the purpose for which technical obligations could be imposed. Dare I hope that he will be equally as receptive to my amendment in this group? Amendment 78 seeks to ensure that Clause 11 is genuinely used only as a...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1479-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an interesting idea which, theoretically anyhow, we should consider very seriously. I hope the Minister will do so.

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1459
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 120A. First, I apologise for the slightly artificial introduction of this amendment at this point in the proceedings. The use of a paving amendment, Amendment 120A, at this juncture is simply a result of the desire of the signatories to the amendment...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1455-8
House
House of Lords

87: Clause 13, page 15, line 16, at end insert— "( ) that those provisions do not have a significant adverse effect on legitimate users;"

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1487
House
House of Lords

I add my support to the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam. As I said earlier when I made a request to include quality as a requirement, we all have an interest in the maintenance of impartial news programmes. Plurality, which we believe in, must go hand in hand...

Member
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1507
House
House of Lords