Skip to main content

1-20 of 208 results for subject:Betting

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Agreed to on question

Lead member
Tom Greatrex
Answering member
Hugh Robertson
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 cc739-740
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for giving way again. There is evidence that it is possible to spend £18,000 in an hour on FOBT machines. I agree with the hon. Member for Chatham and Aylesford (Tracey Crouch) that the people whom we should be looking after are the most vulnerable in...

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c738
House
House of Commons

I understand much of what the hon. Gentleman is saying. The challenge for us as a Government and me as a Minister is to work out a way to deal with the problem that has rightly been identified—the fact that some people get addicted through this sort of gambling—but to...

Member
Hugh Robertson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c738
House
House of Commons

The Minister talked about a solution that involves the Government, but has he had any conversations with his colleagues in the Department for Communities and Local Government about licence fees and local authorities, because they have a role to play in this and they can represent their communities? If the...

Member
Graham P Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c738
House
House of Commons

The simple answer is that we are in constant contact with DCLG. The Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, my right hon. Friend the Member for Bath (Mr Foster), used to speak on these matters for the Lib Dems and is now the Minister with responsibility for them....

Member
Hugh Robertson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c738
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Tom Greatrex) on securing this debate, because I have learned one or two things tonight. I have constituents who have come to see me about some real problems. The comparisons that we must think about, however, go further...

Member
David Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c739
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for making that point. It is, indeed, in theory perfectly possible—although we will have to wait and see where the evidence from the consultation leads us—to deal with one set of machines in one way and another in another way, and we may want to...

Member
Hugh Robertson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c739
House
House of Commons

One piece of evidence the Minister may take into consideration is that the average spin on a B2 machine is about £15, which is seven or eight times the maximum on a B3 machine. That, rather than the

possibility of spending £18,000 in an hour, is what concerns to me....

Member
Andy Slaughter (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c739
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a fair point of which I am aware. I hope everybody who has spoken in the debate contributed to our consultation; if so, their responses will be lying there among the 9,000 that I am sure my civil servants are looking forward to wading through over...

Member
Hugh Robertson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c740
House
House of Commons

I am pleased to have secured this debate. I know from the number of letters, e-mails and, indeed, tweets I have received in the past few days that there is concern about the prevalence of fixed-odds betting terminals—or FOBTs, as they are commonly known—primarily in high street betting shops. A...

Member
Tom Greatrex (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 cc725-6
House
House of Commons

The anti-gambling lobby says consistently that gamblers can lose up to £18,000 per hour on these machines. Will my hon. Friend comment on the likelihood of that?

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c726
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend anticipates my next point. Even if somebody played at the maximum speed for an hour, it would be highly unlikely that they would lose every single time. I suspect that the odds of losing £18,000 in an hour are pretty long. However, this is not just an...

Member
Tom Greatrex (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c726
House
House of Commons

Is there not a bigger problem for individuals who have problems with gambling, in that they can sit at home gambling online 24 hours a day, often with bigger stakes than £100 every time? I wonder why the anti-gambling lobby and a lot of people do not focus on that...

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c727
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point, and I would not describe myself as anti-gambling. Some industry representatives seem to take quite an arrogant and dismissive attitude to concerns that are expressed, but I would not call myself anti-gambling. He is right that people can gamble significant amounts on the...

Member
Tom Greatrex (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c727
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that at least a betting office pays taxation and can deal with problems and give advice in-house, whereas gambling on computers is a whole new direction, with a lot of young people involved? No money comes back to the country, because it all goes offshore....

Member
David Hamilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c727
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right about where the profits of a lot of internet gambling go, but I would have more sympathy with his argument about high street betting shops if I could be more confident about the supposed self-regulation for people who have a problem. People have to...

Member
Tom Greatrex (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c727
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing this debate on an issue that is incredibly important in the Medway towns and Chatham, where we have seen a proliferation of bookmakers on the high street.

It is wrong that people who raise concerns about fixed-odds betting terminals are considered part of the...

Member
Tracey Crouch (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c727
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady, who makes her point well. It is easy to dismiss concerns as coming from people who are anti-gambling or who want to abolish it. I understand that that is not her position, and it is certainly not mine. She is absolutely right to highlight the...

Member
Tom Greatrex (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c727
House
House of Commons

I am taking great notice of what my hon. Friend is saying as it is important not to characterise this debate as being either for or against gambling; it is not as simple or straightforward as that. May I put the record straight and say that not all online gambling...

Member
Robert Flello (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c728
House
House of Commons

Hasn’t it sponsored Stoke?

Member
Stephen Pound (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
561 c728
House
House of Commons