Skip to main content

1-20 of 27 results for subject:Capital

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.

The Bill has a simple objective at its heart, which is to answer what the Chancellor has called the British dilemma: how can Britain be one of the world’s leading financial centres without exposing ordinary working people in...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2013
Reference
560 c36
House
House of Commons

I should have thought it was reasonable for the Financial Secretary to the Treasury to introduce a Bill on financial services.

Let me continue to make my point. The financial services sector is of great importance to Britain, but that importance carries risks for this country. At their peak, the banks’...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2013
Reference
560 cc36-7
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that the Chancellor has not been able to join us for the debate. The Bill may be called the Clark-Javid Act, but it will certainly not be called the Osborne Act given his disappearance.

As the Financial Secretary said, the global financial crisis has cast a long shadow....

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2013
Reference
560 cc47-8
House
House of Commons

Motion that the draft Bank of England Act 1998 (Macro-prudential Measures) Order 2013, which was laid before this House on 24 January, be approved. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Greg Clark
Answering member
Chris Leslie
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc429-442
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That the draft Bank of England Act 1998 (Macro-prudential Measures) Order 2013, which was laid before this House on 24 January, be approved.

One of the most significant failings of the previous system for regulating financial services was the lack of clear responsibility for financial stability. It has...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c430
House
House of Commons

The Minister has just mentioned the leverage ratio. There are two crucial issues: first, the leverage ratio should be firmly in the hands of the FPC, not the Government; and, secondly, the UK should be able to act unilaterally, rather than necessarily having to wait indefinitely for international agreement—we should...

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c431
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend knows, that has been a matter of much debate in the Treasury Committee and the Banking Commission, both of which he chairs. It is appropriate to have regard to the international debate on this. There is a difference between the debate on the leverage ratio and...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c431
House
House of Commons

I am intrigued by the Minister’s 2018 commitment, but would it not make good and prudent legislative sense to take the opportunity in the draft Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill, which will arrive in the House imminently, to insert provisions that would allow the leverage ratio to be triggered sooner...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c431
House
House of Commons

We do not expect such a delay. The discussions are continuing and are live, as we know, so we do not expect to need that, but of course it is open to the House as it debates the Bill, presumably at some length, to keep that under review as the...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc431-3
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister explain what possible logic there is to maintaining the leverage ratio at exactly the same level as a back-stop for risk weights of more than 10% as when the risk weights were set at only 8%?

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c433
House
House of Commons

The discussions on those need to proceed separately—I think that the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Bill Committee will have some vigorous discussions—but the order relates solely to the sectoral requirements.

The Government will, of course, be able to add to the suite of macro-prudential tools in the future by further order,...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c433
House
House of Commons

The jargon in this order may deter not just members of the public but—dare I say it?—hon. Members from rolling up their sleeves and getting involved in this debate. I contend, however, that, in layman’s turns, the order involves an incredibly important set of issues. We are talking about giving...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc433-6
House
House of Commons

I rise to put two points to the House. First, I object to the statutory instrument on a matter of principle, which I will outline. Secondly, I want to ask the Minister why he included residential property among the first prudential tools. Some of the tools make sense—including commercial, and,...

Member
George Mudie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc436-8
House
House of Commons

indicated assent.

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c437
House
House of Commons

I see the Minister nodding. I am sure that he will explain, but that is the sort of thing I am talking about. If the loan-to-value ratio had been in this statutory instrument—if the interim FPC had stuck at it—I think this place would have been full and the Minister...

Member
George Mudie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc437-9
House
House of Commons

Let me respond to the points made by the hon. Members for Nottingham East (Chris Leslie) and for Leeds East (Mr Mudie). They made some thoughtful points about the House’s ability to scrutinise the powers that will be available to the FPC, particularly those relating to residential mortgages. Their comments...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c439
House
House of Commons

As a member of the Treasury Committee, I hear it said all the time that we have the ability to scrutinise, and that people are accountable to us. That carries little weight with me; it does not impress me. This is ultimately a question of who takes the decisions when...

Member
George Mudie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c439
House
House of Commons

Let me go on to describe some of the other elements involved. I said that we had committed to bringing to the House particular measures that could be debated. The hon. Gentleman has anticipated one

such possibility. He was correct in suggesting that, if we had been proposing a power...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc439-441
House
House of Commons

I am sorry, but as I read the order, I note that it says that UK firms can be required to maintain “additional” funds, but there seems to be no provision to dial it down the other way. Have I misread the order?

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 c441
House
House of Commons

What I am referring to is the fact that if the requirements have been dialled up, they can be dialled down. That will be required. The fact that they are time varying precisely reflects the different conditions that will apply from time to time.

The hon. Gentleman mentioned the exemption for...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 February 2013
Reference
559 cc441-2
House
House of Commons