Skip to main content

1-20 of 202 results for subject:Debates

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to take note of the sixth report of the Procedure Select Committee (HL 151 2012-13). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Sewel
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL); Procedure Committee (HL)
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1417-1437
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to appoint, for the duration of the 2013-14 Session of Parliament, a Backbench Debates Committee. Disagreed to on division (209 to 245).

Lead member
Lord Sewel
Department
Chairman of Committees (HL)
Type
Debates
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1437
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I said when moving the previous Motion, the committee has made no recommendation on the issue of a Back-Bench debates committee, and the House is invited merely to take note of this report. My position on the appointment of a Back-Bench debates committee is therefore neutral. My...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1417-9
House
House of Lords

Will the Lord Chairman clarify the position that he has outlined? The Motion implies to me—and I may have misunderstood it—that in order to secure the additional slots for these debates, it is first necessary to approve the new Back-Bench Members committee. If this Motion is rejected, will the new...

Member
Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1419
House
House of Lords

Yes, I am happy to give that clarification. The new slots have been agreed. What we must decide today is how those slots are filled and who has responsibility, whether they are selected by the traditional method of ballots and first come, first served or by a Back-Bench committee. So...

Member
Lord Sewel (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1419
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord, Lord Butler, like to speak first? It might make more sense and, if he would like to do so, I should be delighted to give way.

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1419
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that I should defer to the Leader of the House but if he would like me to speak first, I am very willing.

I support the Motion that the House should establish for the duration of the 2013-14 Session a Back-Bench debates committee but I should first...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1419-1421
House
House of Lords

The Back-Bench committee in the other place is, of course, elected and not selected by the usual channels. Can the noble Lord tell us how he sees this committee being selected? My view of it is very dependent on it being elected if it is to be as effective as...

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1420
House
House of Lords

The method of appointment is not specified in the resolution but, for my part, I wholly agree with the noble Lord. It is right that such a committee should be elected and it should, of course, include representatives of all the groups in the House, as indeed happens in another...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1420-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Lord Chairman for his introduction and to the noble Lord, Lord Butler of Brockwell, for getting our debate under way. It is extremely good to see a former Cabinet Secretary, who operated at the highest levels within Whitehall for many years, not always...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1422-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can my noble friend go a little further on this very point? At the moment he got to it, I was reading the sentence in his letter which said that,

“there are reforms we could make—for instance, to ensure that debates drawn by ballot command sufficient interest in the...

Member
Lord Crickhowell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1424
House
House of Lords

As the Chairman of Committees made clear earlier, on both proposals some of the precise details of how one can address these points will need to be worked through. For example, it would be possible to have criteria around the amount of support that there was for a particular balloted...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1424
House
House of Lords

At the moment I am somewhat neutral and not at all sure which way I would want to vote. One point that is made by the sixth report, and which was put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Butler, concerns dealing with issues that are either topical or of long-term...

Member
Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1424
House
House of Lords

On the principle of having to set some criteria, for example on identifying topicality, I shall just go back one stage. I am very glad to have been able to come up with this new proposal for guaranteed time, once a week, to deal with a topical issue on the...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1424
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord referred earlier to the quirky. How will the quirky meet these new criteria? He prayed in aid the need for the quirky Motion to be tabled. How would that work?

Member
Lord Campbell-Savours (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1424
House
House of Lords

There are a number of different points there. I certainly used the word quirky—I quite like quirky. This goes to the heart of the issue of having a rational process. The noble Lord, Lord Butler, talked persuasively in some ways about wanting a rational process. That could obviously mean a...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1424
House
House of Lords

I am following my noble friend very closely because I have some sympathy with his point of view and I pay tribute to him for bringing forward some extremely interesting proposals. However, the House does itself no good service by constantly referring to this process as a ballot. It is...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we do have a ballot. I have had this conversation before with my noble friend, who I know takes the view that it is a lottery rather than a ballot. It is a ballot by definition, one in which everyone has an equal chance and does not need...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I appreciate what the noble Lord the Leader has done in seeking to respond to the pressure for more Back-Bench debates and time. That is utterly commendable. However, he is proposing a mechanism whereby we would still have a lottery in which we chose from topics that were...

Member
Lord Filkin (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c1425
House
House of Lords

My Lords, topical Questions each week are dealt with in precisely that way. As I have said, we would need to agree in the Procedure Committee, in just the same way as we would if we end up with a Back-Bench debates committee, the criteria by which that committee will...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1425-6
House
House of Lords