Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for subject:Intestacy

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I have today written to the chair of the Law Commission to set out the Government’s formal response to the commission’s report, Intestacy and Family Provision Claims on Death (Law Com No 331). The report, which was published on 14 December 2011, formed part of the commission’s tenth programme and...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
21 March 2013
Reference
744 cc59-60WS
House
House of Lords

My noble Friend the Minister of State for Justice (Lord McNally) has made the following written ministerial statement.

I have today written to the chair of the Law Commission to set out the Government’s formal response to the commission’s report “Intestacy and family provision claims on death” (Law Com No 331)....

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
21 March 2013
Reference
560 cc57-8WS
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Chris Grayling
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Annual reports; House of Commons papers
Date
22 January 2013
Reference
HC 908 2012-13
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, in 2008 I introduced the Cohabitation Bill to give legal rights to financial provision for those in cohabiting relationships in the event of separation or death. It won wide support but was strongly opposed by the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, who, I am delighted to say, will take...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1655-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I pay tribute to the noble Lord, Lord Lester, for introducing the Bill. This House often groans when lawyers seem to dominate debates and I often hear the proud declaration being made by non-lawyers when they stand to speak that they are untainted by law and that they...

Member
Baroness Kennedy of the Shaws (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1658-1660
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak to express the strongest opposition to the passage of a Bill that, in a nutshell, will mean a further disinheritance of the children of the many marriages in this country that have ended in divorce, or who were born into unmarried and later broken relationships. It...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1660-4
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness. Has she looked at jurisdictions in other countries where there is similar legislation that works perfectly well?

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 c1664
House
House of Lords

My Lords, family law in this country does not always follow other countries; sometimes we learn from them. Indeed, sometimes I wish we had followed Scotland when it comes to dividing up proceeds on divorce, but that is another issue.

What about the unregistered Muslim marriage with several surviving legally unmarried...

Member
Baroness Deech (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1664-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Lester of Herne Hill, provides a valuable opportunity to consider issues that are of considerable and increasing importance for a large number of people in our society. Reference has already been made to the Law Commission’s 2007 report in which...

Member
Bishop of Manchester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1665-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose the Bill because I believe in the importance of marriage. Before continuing, I have to say that we have had very thoughtful contributions from all speakers. Most have been clear, but there have been some legal situations that I, as a non-legal person, cannot really put...

Member
Baroness O'Cathain (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1667-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am aware that I have no experience and little knowledge on this subject so it is with trepidation that I make my few remarks. I approach the Bill in general agreement with the sentiments behind it. After all, it seems very benign. It is always important to...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1669-1670
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while I recognise that the Bill is motivated by the best of intentions to ensure that injustices do not occur with respect to cohabitation and intestacy, I believe that its net contribution would be negative. There has been far

too much legislation in recent years, and the Bill...

Member
Lord Browne of Belmont (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1670-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, for a variety of reasons, spiritual human and societal, I, too, am a strong supporter of the institution of marriage, but I recognise that there are other kinds of relationship which give rise to responsibilities and rights for which it may be appropriate that legal provision be made....

Member
Lord Harries of Pentregarth (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1672-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the issue of what happens to cohabitants of long standing who are left behind when their partner dies is one which has caused problems for thousands of people over the years. The Law Commission undoubtedly recognised that in its 2011 report. The noble Lord, Lord Lester, does a...

Member
Baroness O'Loan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1674-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the House for permitting me to speak in the gap. I had not put my name down to speak because I was not clear that I could be here for the whole of the debate. I strongly support the Bill because it addresses a...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1676-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Lester, for his able, comprehensive and indeed brief introduction to the Bill. I am not going to speak for long because most of the things that need to be said on this issue have already been said. However, I want to say...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1677-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Thornton, for that response indicating the attitude of the official Opposition to the Bill. I do not follow her entirely on the subject of the contribution of the noble Baroness, Lady Deech—or, indeed, any of the contributions. This has been...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1678-1681
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful to everyone who has spoken in this debate. The House will be glad to know that I shall not seek to reply to 23 questions in what I am about to say. I am especially grateful to those who have spoken against my opinions....

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1681-2
House
House of Lords

Agreed to on question and committed to a Committee of the Whole House

Lead member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill
Answering member
Lord McNally
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
19 October 2012
Reference
739 cc1655-1682
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many cases where a person died without leaving a will or any entitled kin were referred to the Estates Group within the Bona Vacantia Division of the Treasury Solicitor in each of the last five years.

[106537]

Asked by
Ben Gummer (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 May 2012
Reference
106537; 545 cc204-5W
House
House of Commons