Skip to main content

1-20 of 96 results for subject:Liability

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Helen Grant) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

In my Written Ministerial Statement of 18 December 2012 about the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 Act) I undertook to make a further Statement before the end of...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
744 cc178-180WS
House
House of Lords

In my written ministerial statement of 18 December 2012, Official Report, column 96WS about the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (“the 2010 Act”) I undertook to make a further statement before the end of the current Session of Parliament.

I am pleased to announce that the Government intend to...

Member
Helen Grant (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
561 cc71-2WS
House
House of Commons

My Lords, this is an issue that has already been debated in some detail. Noble Lords will recall that the Government were nearly successful in persuading the House to accept the vote on Report, losing by the smallest of margins—indeed, by just two votes. Nevertheless I reassure noble Lords that...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative; Conservative; Conservative; Other (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1320-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before addressing the main issue I should indicate that I have no objection to the amendments that the Commons introduced to reinstate the amendments that were agreed in Grand Committee, if the decision of the House is to refuse this amendment.

The main issue relates to Clause 61, which...

Member
Lord Hardie (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
744 cc1325-6
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 35.

Member
Jo Swinson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 c216
House
House of Commons

It is good to see you back in your place, Madam Deputy Speaker.

Before I turn to the four issues covered by this group of amendments, it is worth revisiting the supposed purpose of the Bill. It is supposed to be an enterprise Bill that will generate growth. It was referred...

Member
Chuka Umunna (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 cc225-6
House
House of Commons

Border security is vital for the UK. While it is right that the Government are in the lead on this, carriers and the transport sector as a whole have an important role to play. We are therefore strengthening our partnership with this sector on a broad range of border security...

Member
Lord Harper (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
560 cc6-7WS
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Minister of State for Immigration (Mark Harper) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Border security is vital for the UK. While it is right that the Government are in the lead on this, carriers and the transport sector as a whole have an important role...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
12 March 2013
Reference
744 cc7-8WS
House
House of Lords

I start by warmly welcoming the amendments tabled by the Minister, which respond in a very positive fashion to the amendment that I moved in Committee. I had no idea I was being so persuasive. That was a trick I should learn in other places. I clearly have something that...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2013
Reference
744 cc93-4
House
House of Lords

Second Reading Committee motion to recommend that the Bill ought to be read a second time. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
David Mundell
Answering member
William Bain
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on bills; Second Reading Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Reading Committee
Date
11 March 2013
House
House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc305-316GC
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed on question.

Lead member
Earl Howe
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department of Health
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 c316GC
House
House of Lords

Motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Mark Hoban
Answering member
Stephen Timms
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Twelfth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
7 March 2013
House
House of Commons

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health (Earl Howe):

My Lords, I beg to move that the Pneumoconiosis etc. (Workers’ Compensation) (Payment of Claims) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 be considered. I shall speak also to the Mesothelioma Lump Sum Payments (Conditions and Amounts) (Amendment) Regulations 2013. I am required to confirm...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc306-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for outlining in some considerable detail the statistics relating to these two schemes. I will come back to a question that I would have put to him had I been able to intervene earlier. The regulations under consideration

today make provision, as...

Member
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc308-310GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I echo what the noble Lord, Lord Wigley, has said about the commitments that were made two years ago and about the inconsistency of the Government’s response to the demands that were made, I think in both Houses, at that time. When the equivalent to this order was...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc310-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking the noble Earl, Lord Howe, for introducing the regulations. I am bound to say that we are used to seeing a DWP Minister deal with them, but we are delighted that it is the noble Earl. I do not know whether that is a...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc311-3GC
House
House of Lords

Earl Howe:

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken. In answer to the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, as to why a Health Minister is responding, I am, at least for this afternoon and for the first time, proudly wearing my DWP hat in the absence of...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc313-5GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to the Minister for going through these matters in such great detail. Am I not right that the pre-1948 cases could also receive lump-sum payments? He referred to £5 a week, which of course is a Revenue payment. Is there any danger of people losing out...

Member
Lord Wigley (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 c314GC
House
House of Lords

I am advised from the highest authority that the answer to that question is no. If I can supply the noble Lord with any further information, I would be happy to do so. The noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, asked me whether I could give him any further information on the...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2013
Reference
743 cc314-6GC
House
House of Lords