Skip to main content

1-20 of 257 results for subject:Reviews

Session X
2012-13

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

In April 2011, the Cabinet Office announced that all non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) would undergo a substantive review at least once every three years. I have today launched a review of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE).

Triennial reviews are part of the Government’s commitment to ensuring that NDPBs continue to...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written statements
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
561 cc73-4WS
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Minister for Employment (Mark Hoban) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

In April 2011, the Cabinet Office announced that all non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) would undergo a substantive review at least once every three years. I have today launched a review of the Health and Safety...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written statements
Date
25 April 2013
Reference
744 cc168-9WS
House
House of Lords

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Dr Daniel Poulter) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Today the review of the regulation of cosmetic interventions has been published. I wish to express my thanks to Sir Bruce Keogh, the chairman, and the other members of the review body for...

Member
Earl Howe (Conservative)
Department
Department of Health
Type
Written statements
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
744 c157WS
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Defence Committee
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
HC 1090-i 2012-13
House
House of Commons

Today the review of the regulation of cosmetic interventions has been published. I wish to express my thanks to Sir Bruce Keogh, the chairman, and the other members of the review body for their report.

The Poly Implant Prothése (PIP) breast implant scandal highlighted the unacceptably poor quality of clinical practice...

Member
Dan Poulter (Conservative)
Department
Department of Health
Type
Written statements
Date
24 April 2013
Reference
561 c56WS
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Minister of State for Universities and Science (David Willetts) has today made the following Statement.

The coalition Government made a commitment to review public bodies, with the aim of increasing accountability for actions carried out on behalf of the

state. The triennial review of the Council...

Member
Viscount Younger of Leckie (Conservative)
Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written statements
Date
22 April 2013
Reference
744 cc111-2WS
House
House of Lords

I beg to move amendment 1, page 1, line 7, at end add—

‘(1) The Chancellor of the Exchequer shall, within three months of the passing of this Act, publish a report on the additional rate of income tax.

(2) This report shall review the impact upon Exchequer receipts of setting the...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c506
House
House of Commons

I said that the Budget needed to be about priorities and that we need to look now at how to help people struggling on the lowest incomes and ensure that those with the broadest shoulders bear the greatest burden. In government, Labour took steps to ensure that its pension reliefs...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc508-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is chuntering from a sedentary position. Does he wish to intervene?

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c509
House
House of Commons

I suggest that the hon. Gentleman is quoting selectively in leaving out the fact that the greatest impact is on the bottom decile of earners. When you take the cuts and changes overall, those at the bottom bear the greatest proportional brunt.

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c509
House
House of Commons

It is the hon. Gentleman’s own Chancellor who is quoting selectively from the figures. I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention.

The facts are clear, and beyond the facts is the reality facing households up and down the country. We see people from those households coming into our constituency surgeries...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c509
House
House of Commons

Even some mild empathy from the Chancellor for those bearing the brunt of his catastrophically failing economic plan would be welcome to people up and down the country, who feel that he is extremely out of touch with the reality that they face.

To put the issue into context for Government...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc510-1
House
House of Commons

I do not follow the hon. Gentleman’s logic that that justifies a non-assessment at this stage. He knows very well that there has been a huge intake from the 50p tax rate which this Government fail to acknowledge. He also knows that we suffered a catastrophic international financial crisis in...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c511
House
House of Commons

HMRC’s report, “The Exchequer effect of the 50 per cent additional rate of income tax”, but I will go into that in more detail in due course.

The Prime Minister went on record and said in this Chamber that the 50p tax rate was cut because it did not raise any...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc511-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an extremely strong point, and one that I have made repeatedly. This might seem like small change to the Chancellor, but it could make a very big difference to some of the people affected by his failing economic plan.

I am sure, given the concerns recently expressed...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 c512
House
House of Commons

We have made it perfectly clear from day one that we do not support the cut to the 50p rate now, and we call on the Government to analyse the impact of the introduction and premature removal of the 50p rate. When we come to publish our next manifesto, we...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc512-3
House
House of Commons

Okay. I am pleased that that has been clarified for the record. Other hon. Members will feel the same.

Lord Oakeshott said:

“In such hard times, we should never have rolled over when the Tories wanted to cut the 50p rate unless we got a mansion tax in return. At the next...

Member
Catherine McKinnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 April 2013
Reference
561 cc513-4
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many reviews of the Public Analyst service have been (a) commenced and (b) completed by his Department since 2000.

[150055]

Asked by
Barry Gardiner (Labour)
Answering body
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
150055; 561 c280W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice which full-time members of the judiciary have carried out any functions in relation to review or reform of legislation, in any capacity other than as a member of an official body or inquiry, since May 2010; and what role they held in...

Asked by
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Answering body
Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 April 2013
Reference
561 cc313-4W; 150056
House
House of Commons

The coalition Government made a commitment to review public bodies, with the aim of increasing accountability for actions carried out on behalf of the state. The triennial review of the Council for Science and Technology is one of the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) reviews of non-departmental public...

Member
Lord Willetts (Conservative)
Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written statements
Date
15 April 2013
Reference
561 c3WS
House
House of Commons