Skip to main content

1-20 of 163 results for subject:Injunctions

Session X
2013-14

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government how many super-injunctions on matters relating to libel or privacy are in place in Northern Ireland; and whether any have been granted since 1 January 2014. [HL6544]

Asked by
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 April 2014
Reference
HL6544; 753 c282WA
House
House of Lords

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Minister for Courts and Legal Aid (Shailesh Vara, MP), has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I have today laid and published the Government’s response to part one of the consultation “Court Fees, Proposals for Reform”, which ran from 3 December 2013 to...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
1 April 2014
Reference
753 cc95-6WS
House
House of Lords

I have today laid and published the Government’s response to part one of the consultation “Court Fees, Proposals for Reform” which ran from 3 December 2013 to 21 January 2014.

For many years, the civil court system has operated under the principle that those who use the courts should pay the...

Member
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
1 April 2014
Reference
578 cc75-6WS
House
House of Commons

Clauses 26 to 29 agreed to. Schedule 10 agreed to. Clause 30 agreed to. Schedule 11 agreed to.

Lead member
Tom Brake; Oliver Heald
Answering member
Chi Onwurah
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Deregulation Bill Committee
Date
11 March 2014
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendments 1 to 68, 138 and 168.

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2014
Reference
575 c183
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Theresa May
Department
Home Office
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
30 January 2014
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My Lords, the House will recall that, on the first day of Report,

your Lordships agreed, by some margin, an amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Dear, which modified the test for the grant of an injunction under Part 1. That amendment, and the outcome of the debate, reflected...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 January 2014
Reference
751 cc980-2
House
House of Lords
Member
Oliver Letwin (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Government bills
Date
23 January 2014
Reference
Bill 162 2013-14
House
House of Commons

My Lords, in moving Amendment 1, I want to be absolutely clear on one thing: anti-social behaviour can be, and often is, a blight on society and on those who suffer as victims of individuals who care only for themselves—people who are thoughtless, selfish or deliberately provocative. I believe, as...

Member
Lord Dear (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 cc1513-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Committee, Clause 1(5)(a) was the subject of some debate. It and the related provision in Clause 21 have also been a subject between the Home Office and the Joint Committee on Human Rights. Essentially, this provision places a duty on the court to avoid, as far as...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 c1543
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments, 4, 5, 24 and 25 are all directed at a defence for an application for an IPNA or for a criminal behaviour order. My amendments are different from definitions of the first condition which is the requirement for an injunction or an order.

There must be cases where...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 c1548
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Committee, my noble friend Lady Hamwee questioned whether it was appropriate for under-18s to be excluded from their own homes on the grounds of anti-social behaviour. After further consideration, I am content to make a change that ensures that only adults can be excluded from their home...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 c1562
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment follows up the debate in Committee initiated by the noble Lord, Lord Rosser, about Clause 13. This clause preserves an existing power available to social landlords to apply for tenancy injunctions to prohibit anti-social behaviour which relates to or affects their management of their housing stock.

In...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 c1563
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will speak also to the other amendments in my name in this group. Amendments 12 and 13 to Schedule 2, and Amendments 34 and 35 to Clause 37, seek to remove imprisonment as a sanction for children breaching their IPNAs or failing to comply with police dispersal...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 cc1553-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, ahead of Report in the House of Commons, the Government published draft guidance for front-line professionals on the new anti-social behaviour powers. With the exception of those sections dealing with the review of criminal behaviour orders and the community remedy, this was to be non-statutory guidance.

In addition to...

Member
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 c1587
House
House of Lords

Clause 129(4) gives the definition of anti-social behaviour. It is that it,

“causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress”,

rather than the nuisance or annoyance definition that relates to Clause 1 for the power to grant injunctions. That is the IPNAs. In Clause 94(6) on out-of-court disposals, anti-social behaviour...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 December 2013
Reference
750 cc329-330
House
House of Lords

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Shailesh Vara) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

“I am today announcing the publication of the Government’s consultation ‘Court Fees: Proposals for reform’ (Cm 8751).

For many years, the civil court system has operated under the principle that those who...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
3 December 2013
Reference
750 cc14-5WS
House
House of Lords

I am today announcing the publication of the Government’s consultation “Court Fees: Proposals for reform” (Cm 8751).

For many years, the civil court system has operated under the principle that those who use the courts should pay the full cost of the service they receive. However, this has not yet been...

Member
Shailesh Vara (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
3 December 2013
Reference
571 cc40-1WS
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I will also speak to Amendment 21G. The first of these amendments takes us to Clause 12, which is the clause giving power to exclude a person from his home in the case of violence or the risk of harm. This power can be included in an IPNA—in...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
749 cc971-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have tabled amendments 21E and 21F to seek to clarify the effect of changes made to Clause 12 on Report in the House of Commons. As I understand it, the effect of those changes is that the ability to exclude a person who is the subject of...

Member
Lord Rosser (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2013
Reference
749 cc974-5
House
House of Lords